Literature DB >> 33592156

Not All Procedural Learning Tasks Are Difficult for Adults With Developmental Language Disorder.

LouAnn Gerken1, Elena Plante2, Lisa Goffman3.   

Abstract

Purpose The experiment reported here compared two hypotheses for the poor statistical and artificial grammar learning often seen in children and adults with developmental language disorder (DLD; also known as specific language impairment). The procedural learning deficit hypothesis states that implicit learning of rule-based input is impaired, whereas the sequential pattern learning deficit hypothesis states that poor performance is only seen when learners must implicitly compute sequential dependencies. The current experiment tested learning of an artificial grammar that could be learned via feature activation, as observed in an associatively organized lexicon, without computing sequential dependencies and should therefore be learnable on the sequential pattern learning deficit hypothesis, but not on the procedural learning deficit hypothesis. Method Adults with DLD and adults with typical language development (TD) listened to consonant-vowel-consonant-vowel familiarization words from one of two artificial phonological grammars: Family Resemblance (two out of three features) and a control (exclusive OR, in which both consonants are voiced OR both consonants are voiceless) grammar in which no learning was predicted for either group. At test, all participants rated 32 test words as to whether or not they conformed to the pattern in the familiarization words. Results Adults with DLD and adults with TD showed equal and robust learning of the Family Resemblance grammar, accepting significantly more conforming than nonconforming test items. Both groups who were familiarized with the Family Resemblance grammar also outperformed those who were familiarized with the OR grammar, which, as predicted, was learned by neither group. Conclusion Although adults and children with DLD often underperform, compared to their peers with TD, on statistical and artificial grammar learning tasks, poor performance appears to be tied to the implicit computation of sequential dependencies, as predicted by the sequential pattern learning deficit hypothesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33592156      PMCID: PMC8608183          DOI: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  58 in total

Review 1.  Specific language impairment is not specific to language: the procedural deficit hypothesis.

Authors:  Michael T Ullman; Elizabeth I Pierpont
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Nonword repetition depends on the frequency of sublexical representations at different grain sizes: Evidence from a multi-factorial analysis.

Authors:  Jakub M Szewczyk; Marta Marecka; Shula Chiat; Zofia Wodniecka
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-06-11

3.  Domain-general sequence learning deficit in specific language impairment.

Authors:  Agnes Lukács; Ferenc Kemény
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Implicit and explicit category learning by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  J David Smith; Matthew J Crossley; Joseph Boomer; Barbara A Church; Michael J Beran; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 2.231

5.  Factors that influence lexical and semantic fast mapping of young children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  Mary Alt; Elena Plante
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  The relationship between phonological memory, receptive vocabulary, and fast mapping in young children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  Shelley Gray
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Infant learning is influenced by local spurious generalizations.

Authors:  LouAnn Gerken; Carolyn Quam
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2016-04-07

8.  Semantic features in fast-mapping: performance of preschoolers with specific language impairment versus preschoolers with normal language.

Authors:  Mary Alt; Elena Plante; Marlena Creusere
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  An alternative to the procedural∼declarative memory account of developmental language disorder.

Authors:  Lisa Goffman; LouAnn Gerken
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.288

10.  Sequence-specific procedural learning deficits in children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  Hsinjen Julie Hsu; Dorothy V M Bishop
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2014-01-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.