Literature DB >> 33592057

Future fertility of patients with zero oocytes yield in their first IVF cycle attempt.

Raoul Orvieto1,2,3, Jacob Farhi2,4, Ravit Nahum1,2, Shani Basch1, Jigal Haas1,2, Adva Aizer1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aim to estimate the future fertility of patient undergoing their first IVF cycle attempt with no oocyte retrieved, and to identify factors that might predict those who will conceive in subsequent IVF cycle attempt.
METHODS: A cohort retrospective study of all consecutive women attending our IVF unit, for their first IVF cycle attempt, between January 2013 to December 2019, who reached the ovum pick-up (OPU) stage with zero oocyte retrieved. Patients' characteristics and infertility-treatment-related variables in the first IVF cycle attempt were compared between those who conceived in a subsequent cycle and those who did not. Moreover, infertility-treatment-related variables during successful cycles resulting in pregnancy were compared to those without.
RESULTS: 59 met the study inclusion criteria, yielding zero oocytes. During the follow-up period, 12 (20.3%) women conceived (one conceived twice), and 8 (14%) gave birth to a live infant. Cumulative live-birth rate per OPU and per patients were 4% and 14%, respectively. Clinical pregnancies were achieved after 3.61+1.4 cycle attempts (range: 1-6), with no live-births following the fifth IVF cycle attempt. No in-between group differences were observed in ovarian stimulation variables of their first IVF cycle attempt. Moreover, in those cycles resulting in pregnancy, patients achieved a significantly higher number of fertilized oocytes (2.15+1.5 vs 0.94+1.5, respectively; p<0.01) and a higher mean top-quality embryos (TQE) (1.76+0.9 vs 0.73+1.2, respectively; p<0.003).
CONCLUSION: Women yielding zero oocytes at their first IVF cycle attempt, may achieve 14% cumulative live-birth rate after 5 IVF cycle attempts. Moreover, those who conceived in subsequent IVF cycle attempts were those achieving 2 or more fertilized oocytes/TQE.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33592057      PMCID: PMC7886146          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  10 in total

1.  Do stimulation characteristics of the first in vitro fertilization cycle predict pregnancy in women of 40 years old and over?

Authors:  Roy Homburg; Simion Meltcer; Jacob Rabinson; Efraim Zohav; Eyal Y Anteby; Raoul Orvieto
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Cumulative live birth rates according to the number of oocytes retrieved after the first ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a multicenter multinational analysis including ∼15,000 women.

Authors:  Nikolaos P Polyzos; Panagiotis Drakopoulos; Jose Parra; Antonio Pellicer; Samuel Santos-Ribeiro; Herman Tournaye; Ernesto Bosch; Juan Garcia-Velasco
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?

Authors:  Panagiotis Drakopoulos; Christophe Blockeel; Dominic Stoop; Michel Camus; Michel de Vos; Herman Tournaye; Nikolaos P Polyzos
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-01-02       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles.

Authors:  Sesh Kamal Sunkara; Vivian Rittenberg; Nick Raine-Fenning; Siladitya Bhattacharya; Javier Zamora; Arri Coomarasamy
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria.

Authors:  A P Ferraretti; A La Marca; B C J M Fauser; B Tarlatzis; G Nargund; L Gianaroli
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Live birth rates in Bologna poor responders treated with ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI.

Authors:  Nikolaos P Polyzos; Milie Nwoye; Roberta Corona; Christophe Blockeel; Dominic Stoop; Patrick Haentjens; Michel Camus; Herman Tournaye
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 7.  The poor-responder patient in an in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) program.

Authors:  Z Ben-Rafael; R Orvieto; D Feldberg
Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.260

8.  Influence of ovarian stimulation with HP-hMG or recombinant FSH on embryo quality parameters in patients undergoing IVF.

Authors:  Søren Ziebe; Kersti Lundin; Ronny Janssens; Lisbeth Helmgaard; Joan-Carles Arce
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  The expected cumulative incidence of live birth for patients starting IVF treatment at age 41 years or older.

Authors:  Oshrit Lebovitz; Jigal Haas; Kaitlyn E James; Daniel S Seidman; Raoul Orvieto; Ariel Hourvitz
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 3.828

10.  Efficacy and safety of follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa in ART: a randomized controlled trial in poor ovarian responders.

Authors:  P Humaidan; W Chin; D Rogoff; T D'Hooghe; S Longobardi; J Hubbard; J Schertz
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.918

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Future Fertility of Patients With No Embryo Transfer in Their First IVF Cycle Attempts.

Authors:  Xuli Zhu; Mingya Cao; Zhaohui Yao; Peiyang Lu; Yueming Xu; Guimin Hao; Zhiming Zhao
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 6.055

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.