Literature DB >> 26724797

Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?

Panagiotis Drakopoulos1, Christophe Blockeel2, Dominic Stoop2, Michel Camus2, Michel de Vos2, Herman Tournaye2, Nikolaos P Polyzos3.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: What is the impact of ovarian response on cumulative live birth rates (LBR) following utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos in women undergoing their first ovarian stimulation cycle, planned to undergo single embryo transfer (SET). SUMMARY ANSWER: Cumulative LBR significantly increases with the number of oocytes retrieved. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Several studies have addressed the issue of the optimal number of oocytes retrieved following controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for IVF/ICSI and demonstrated that ovarian response is independently related to LBR following IVF/ICSI. The vast majority of studies pertained only to the outcome of the fresh IVF cycle and did not evaluate the cumulative LBR following the transfer of all fresh and frozen-thawed embryos after a single ovarian stimulation, which is the most meaningful outcome for the infertile patient. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This study is a large cohort analysis of retrospective data from January 2009 to December 2013 in a tertiary medical centre, at the Centre for Reproductive Medicine at the University Hospital of Brussels. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: This study included 1099 eligible consecutive women 18-40 years old undergoing their first IVF cycle and planned to undergo SET in their fresh cycle. All patients were treated with a conventional starting gonadotrophin dose of 150-225 IU recombinant FSH (rFSH) in a fixed GnRH antagonist protocol. Vitrification was used as cryopreservation method. To evaluate the impact of oocyte yield on fresh LBR and on cumulative LBR after utilization of all cryopreserved embryos, patients were categorized into four groups according to the number of oocytes retrieved: 1-3 (Group A), 4-9 (Group B), 10-15 (Group C) or >15 oocytes (Group D). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Regarding LBR in the fresh IVF/ICSI cycles, unadjusted results did not show any significant difference when comparing either high (>15 oocytes) versus normal (10-15 oocytes) (P = 0.65), or normal (10-15) versus suboptimal (4-9 oocytes) responders (P = 0.2). LBR in the fresh cycles were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in high, normal and suboptimal responders when compared with the low ovarian responder group (1-3 oocytes). Moderate-severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome occurred in 11 out of 1099 patients (1%). The cumulative LBR significantly increased with the number of oocytes retrieved (χ(2) test for trend P < 0.001). High responders (>15 oocytes) demonstrated a significantly higher LBR not only versus poor (0-3 oocytes) (P < 0.001) and suboptimal (4-9) responders (P < 0.001), but also versus women with normal (10-15) ovarian response (P = 0.014). Finally, although suboptimal responders had a better outcome compared with poor ovarian responders (P = 0.002), this group had a significantly lower cumulative LBR compared with normal ovarian responders (P = 0.02). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the ovarian response category remained an independent predictive factor (P < 0.001) for cumulative LBR. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This is a cohort analysis based on retrospective data collection. Despite our robust methodological approach, the presence of biases related to retrospective design cannot be excluded. High responders may inherently have had a better prognosis. In addition, we cannot provide any guidance for patients undergoing either multiple embryo transfers or treated with higher gonadotrophin doses. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: Women undergoing COS for their first IVF/ICSI cycle and SET should be informed that, although the number of oocytes retrieved does not affect LBR in the fresh cycle, the higher the oocyte yield, the higher the probability to achieve a live birth after utilization of all cryopreserved embryos. Large cohort studies are needed in order to confirm our results of cumulative LBR in different ovarian stimulation settings with higher stimulation doses. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: No external funding was used for this study. No conflicts of interest are declared.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cumulative live birth; live birth rate; ovarian response; ovarian stimulation; single embryo transfer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26724797     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  95 in total

1.  [Pregnancy and obstetric outcomes of elective single versus double cleavage-stage embryo transfer].

Authors:  Ling Sun; Zhi-Heng Chen; Min-Na Yin; Yu Deng; Jun Liu
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2016-04-20

2.  ICSI does not offer any benefit over conventional IVF across different ovarian response categories in non-male factor infertility: a European multicenter analysis.

Authors:  Panagiotis Drakopoulos; Juan Garcia-Velasco; Ernesto Bosch; Christophe Blockeel; Michel de Vos; Samuel Santos-Ribeiro; Antonis Makrigiannakis; Herman Tournaye; Nikolaos P Polyzos
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Excellence in assisted reproductive technologies: clinical and laboratory perspectives.

Authors:  Hakan Yarali; Gurkan Bozdag; Lale Karakoc Sokmensuer; Sezcan Mumusoglu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  A clinical counseling tool predicting supernumerary embryos after a fresh IVF cycle.

Authors:  Yetunde Ibrahim; Greg Stoddard; Erica Johnstone
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Can Oocyte Diameter Predict Embryo Quality?

Authors:  Rawad Bassil; Robert F Casper; Jim Meriano; Ramsey Smith; Jigal Haas; Chaula Mehta; Raoul Orvieto; Eran Zilberberg
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 3.060

6.  Freeze-all cycle for all normal responders?

Authors:  Matheus Roque; Marcello Valle; Fernando Guimarães; Marcos Sampaio; Selmo Geber
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Cumulative live birth and surplus embryo incidence after frozen-thaw cycles in PCOS: how many oocytes do we need?

Authors:  Yuan-Hui Chen; Qian Wang; Ya-Nan Zhang; Xiao Han; Dong-Han Li; Cui-Lian Zhang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Prediction of live birth and cumulative live birth rates in freeze-all-IVF treatment of a general population.

Authors:  Kemal Ozgur; Hasan Bulut; Murat Berkkanoglu; Levent Donmez; Kevin Coetzee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Does the presence of AGG interruptions within the CGG repeat tract have a protective effect on the fertility phenotype of female FMR1 premutation carriers?

Authors:  M Friedman-Gohas; M Kirshenbaum; A Michaeli; N Domniz; S Elizur; H Raanani; R Orvieto; Y Cohen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Medroxyprogesterone acetate used in ovarian stimulation is associated with reduced mature oocyte retrieval and blastocyst development: a matched cohort study of 825 freeze-all IVF cycles.

Authors:  Kemal Ozgur; Murat Berkkanoglu; Hasan Bulut; Levent Donmez; Kevin Coetzee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.