Literature DB >> 33591430

Comparison of microbial community structures between mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of vegetable waste.

Tianjie Ao1,2, Zhijie Xie1,2, Pan Zhou1, Xiaofeng Liu1, Liping Wan3, Dong Li4,5.   

Abstract

The anaerobic digestion performance correlates with the functional microbial community. Mesophilic and thermophilic digestions of vegetable waste were conducted, and dynamics of the microbial community were investigated. The mesophilic and thermophilic collapsed stages occurred at organic loading rates of 1.5 and 2.0 g VS/(L d) due to the accumulation of volatile fatty acids with final concentrations of 2276 and 6476 mg/L, respectively. A high concentration of volatile fatty acids caused the severe inhibition of methanogens, which finally led to the imbalance between acetogenesis and methanogenesis. The mesophilic digestion exhibited a higher microbial diversity and richness than the thermophilic digestion. Syntrophic acetate-oxidizing coupled with hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis was the dominant pathway in the thermophilic stable system, and acetoclastic methanogenesis in the mesophilic stable system. The dominant acidogens, syntrophus, and methanogens were unclassified_f__Anaerolineaceae (8.68%), Candidatus_Cloacamonas (19.70%), Methanosaeta (6.10%), and Methanosarcina (4.08%) in the mesophilic stable stage, and Anaerobaculum (12.59%), Syntrophaceticus (4.84%), Methanosarcina (30.58%), and Methanothermobacter (3.17%) in thermophilic stable stage. Spirochaetae and Thermotogae phyla were the characteristic microorganisms in the mesophilic and thermophilic collapsed stages, respectively. These findings provided valuable information for the deep understanding of the difference of the microbial community and methane-producing mechanism between mesophilic and thermophilic digestion of vegetable waste.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Functional microbial community; Mesophilic anaerobic digestion; Syntrophic acetate-oxidizing; Thermophilic anaerobic digestion; Vegetable waste

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33591430     DOI: 10.1007/s00449-021-02519-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng        ISSN: 1615-7591            Impact factor:   3.210


  37 in total

1.  Enhanced methane production in a two-phase anaerobic digestion plant, after CO2 capture and addition to organic wastes.

Authors:  C Salomoni; A Caputo; M Bonoli; O Francioso; M T Rodriguez-Estrada; D Palenzona
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 9.642

Review 2.  Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources.

Authors:  Alastair J Ward; Phil J Hobbs; Peter J Holliman; David L Jones
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 9.642

3.  Instability diagnosis and syntrophic acetate oxidation during thermophilic digestion of vegetable waste.

Authors:  Dong Li; Yi Ran; Lin Chen; Qin Cao; Zhidong Li; Xiaofeng Liu
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 11.236

4.  Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of soybean curd residue for methane production: Characterizing bacterial and methanogen communities and their correlations with organic loading rate and operating temperature.

Authors:  Le Zhang; Kai-Chee Loh; Suseeven Sarvanantharajah; Yen Wah Tong; Chi-Hwa Wang; Yanjun Dai
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 9.642

5.  A comparative study of thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and wheat straw: Process stability and microbial community structure shifts.

Authors:  Xuchuan Shi; Xianglin Guo; Jiane Zuo; Yajiao Wang; Mengyu Zhang
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 7.145

6.  Methane oxidation coupled to denitrification under microaerobic and hypoxic conditions in leach bed bioreactors.

Authors:  Qin Cao; Xiaofeng Liu; Yi Ran; Zhidong Li; Dong Li
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Differences of methanogenesis between mesophilic and thermophilic in situ biogas-upgrading systems by hydrogen addition.

Authors:  Xianpu Zhu; Liumeng Chen; Yichao Chen; Qin Cao; Xiaofeng Liu; Dong Li
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 3.346

8.  Anaerobic Mesophilic Codigestion of Rice Straw and Chicken Manure: Effects of Organic Loading Rate on Process Stability and Performance.

Authors:  Zili Mei; Xiaofeng Liu; Xianbo Huang; Dong Li; Zhiying Yan; Yuexiang Yuan; Yajun Huang
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 2.926

9.  Instability mechanisms and early warning indicators for mesophilic anaerobic digestion of vegetable waste.

Authors:  Dong Li; Lin Chen; Xiaofeng Liu; Zili Mei; Haiwei Ren; Qin Cao; Zhiying Yan
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 9.642

10.  Study on improving anaerobic co-digestion of cow manure and corn straw by fruit and vegetable waste: Methane production and microbial community in CSTR process.

Authors:  Xuemei Wang; Zifu Li; Xue Bai; Xiaoqin Zhou; Sikun Cheng; Ruiling Gao; Jiachen Sun
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 9.642

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.