Literature DB >> 18406612

Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources.

Alastair J Ward1, Phil J Hobbs, Peter J Holliman, David L Jones.   

Abstract

It is in the interest of operators of anaerobic digestion plants to maximise methane production whilst concomitantly reducing the chemical oxygen demand of the digested material. Although the production of biogas through anaerobic digestion is not a new idea, commercial anaerobic digestion processes are often operated at well below their optimal performance due to a variety of factors. This paper reviews current optimisation techniques associated with anaerobic digestion and suggests possible areas where improvements could be made, including the basic design considerations of a single or multi-stage reactor configuration, the type, power and duration of the mixing regime and the retention of active microbial biomass within the reactor. Optimisation of environmental conditions within the digester such as temperature, pH, buffering capacity and fatty acid concentrations is also discussed. The methane-producing potential of various agriculturally sourced feedstocks has been examined, as has the advantages of co-digestion to improve carbon-to-nitrogen ratios and the use of pre-treatments and additives to improve hydrolysis rates or supplement essential nutrients which may be limiting. However, perhaps the greatest shortfall in biogas production is the lack of reliable sensory equipment to monitor key parameters and suitable, parallelised control systems to ensure that the process continually operates at optimal performance. Modern techniques such as software sensors and powerful, flexible controllers are capable of solving these problems. A direct comparison can be made here with, for instance, oil refineries where a more mature technology uses continuous in situ monitoring and associated feedback procedures to routinely deliver continuous, optimal performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18406612     DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.02.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioresour Technol        ISSN: 0960-8524            Impact factor:   9.642


  45 in total

1.  Inactivation of murine norovirus 1 and Bacteroides fragilis phage B40-8 by mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of pig slurry.

Authors:  Leen Baert; Bart De Gusseme; Nico Boon; Willy Verstraete; Johan Debevere; Mieke Uyttendaele
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Biotechnological application of sustainable biogas production through dry anaerobic digestion of Napier grass.

Authors:  Natthawud Dussadee; Rameshprabu Ramaraj; Tapana Cheunbarn
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 2.406

3.  Simultaneous addition of zero-valent iron and activated carbon on enhanced mesophilic anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge.

Authors:  Tongyu Wang; Yujie Qin; Yan Cao; Bin Han; Junyi Ren
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  BEAP profiles as rapid test system for status analysis and early detection of process incidents in biogas plants.

Authors:  Sarah Refai; Stefanie Berger; Kati Wassmann; Melanie Hecht; Thomas Dickhaus; Uwe Deppenmeier
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Quantitative Metaproteomics Highlight the Metabolic Contributions of Uncultured Phylotypes in a Thermophilic Anaerobic Digester.

Authors:  Live H Hagen; Jeremy A Frank; Mirzaman Zamanzadeh; Vincent G H Eijsink; Phillip B Pope; Svein J Horn; Magnus Ø Arntzen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Comparative biochemical analysis during the anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass from six morphological parts of Williams Cavendish banana (Triploid Musa AAA group) plants.

Authors:  Irénée Kamdem; Serge Hiligsmann; Caroline Vanderghem; Igor Bilik; Michel Paquot; Philippe Thonart
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-06-09       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Metaproteomics of cellulose methanisation under thermophilic conditions reveals a surprisingly high proteolytic activity.

Authors:  Fan Lü; Ariane Bize; Alain Guillot; Véronique Monnet; Céline Madigou; Olivier Chapleur; Laurent Mazéas; Pinjing He; Théodore Bouchez
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 10.302

8.  Inoculation of paperboard mill sludge versus mixed culture bacteria for hydrogen production from paperboard mill wastewater.

Authors:  Ahmed Farghaly; Ahmed Tawfik; Amal Danial
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Comparison of microbial community structures between mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of vegetable waste.

Authors:  Tianjie Ao; Zhijie Xie; Pan Zhou; Xiaofeng Liu; Liping Wan; Dong Li
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.210

10.  Biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion using kitchen waste and poultry manure as substrate-part 1: substrate ratio and effect of temperature.

Authors:  Md Anisur Rahman; Razu Shahazi; Syada Noureen Basher Nova; M Rakib Uddin; Md Shahadat Hossain; Abu Yousuf
Journal:  Biomass Convers Biorefin       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.050

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.