Henk M De Feyter1, Monique A Thomas1, Kevin L Behar2, Robin A de Graaf1. 1. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Deuterium metabolic imaging (DMI) combined with [6,6'-2 H2 ]-glucose has the potential to detect glycogen synthesis in the liver. However, the similar chemical shifts of [6,6'-2 H2 ]-glucose and [6,6'-2 H2 ]-glycogen in the 2 H NMR spectrum make unambiguous detection and separation difficult in vivo, in contrast to comparable approaches using 13 C MRS. Here the NMR visibility of 2 H-labeled glycogen is investigated to better understand its potential contribution to the observed signal in liver following administration of [6,6'-2 H2 ]-glucose. METHODS: Mice were provided drinking water containing 2 H-labeled glucose. High-resolution NMR analyses was performed of isolated liver glycogen in solution, before and after the addition of the glucose-releasing enzyme amyloglucosidase. RESULTS: 2 H-labeled glycogen was barely detectable in solution using 2 H NMR because of the very short T2 (<2 ms) of 2 H-labeled glycogen, giving a spectral line width that is more than five times as broad as that of 13 C-labeled glycogen (T2 = ~10 ms). CONCLUSION: 2 H-labeled glycogen is not detectable with 2 H MRS(I) under in vivo conditions, leaving 13 C MRS as the preferred technique for in vivo detection of glycogen.
PURPOSE: Deuterium metabolic imaging (DMI) combined with [6,6'-2 H2 ]-glucose has the potential to detect glycogen synthesis in the liver. However, the similar chemical shifts of [6,6'-2 H2 ]-glucose and [6,6'-2 H2 ]-glycogen in the 2 H NMR spectrum make unambiguous detection and separation difficult in vivo, in contrast to comparable approaches using 13 C MRS. Here the NMR visibility of 2 H-labeled glycogen is investigated to better understand its potential contribution to the observed signal in liver following administration of [6,6'-2 H2 ]-glucose. METHODS: Mice were provided drinking water containing 2 H-labeled glucose. High-resolution NMR analyses was performed of isolated liver glycogen in solution, before and after the addition of the glucose-releasing enzyme amyloglucosidase. RESULTS: 2 H-labeled glycogen was barely detectable in solution using 2 H NMR because of the very short T2 (<2 ms) of 2 H-labeled glycogen, giving a spectral line width that is more than five times as broad as that of 13 C-labeled glycogen (T2 = ~10 ms). CONCLUSION: 2 H-labeled glycogen is not detectable with 2 H MRS(I) under in vivo conditions, leaving 13 C MRS as the preferred technique for in vivo detection of glycogen.
Authors: J R Alger; L O Sillerud; K L Behar; R J Gillies; R G Shulman; R E Gordon; D Shae; P E Hanley Journal: Science Date: 1981-11-06 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Gülin Oz; Anjali Kumar; Jyothi P Rao; Christopher T Kodl; Lisa Chow; Lynn E Eberly; Elizabeth R Seaquist Journal: Diabetes Date: 2009-06-05 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Henk M De Feyter; Kevin L Behar; Zachary A Corbin; Robert K Fulbright; Peter B Brown; Scott McIntyre; Terence W Nixon; Douglas L Rothman; Robin A de Graaf Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2018-08-22 Impact factor: 14.136
Authors: Ayhan Gursan; Martijn Froeling; Arjan D Hendriks; Dimitri Welting; Arno P M Kentgens; Dennis W J Klomp; Jeanine J Prompers Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2021-10-17 Impact factor: 3.737
Authors: Loreen Ruhm; Nikolai Avdievich; Theresia Ziegs; Armin M Nagel; Henk M De Feyter; Robin A de Graaf; Anke Henning Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2021-10-09 Impact factor: 6.556