Literature DB >> 25689771

Toward a standard lexicon for ecosystem services.

Wayne R Munns1, Anne W Rea2, Marisa J Mazzotta1, Lisa A Wainger3, Kathryn Saterson4.   

Abstract

The complex, widely dispersed, and cumulative environmental challenges currently facing society require holistic, transdisciplinary approaches to resolve. The concept of ecosystem services (ES) has become more widely accepted as a framework that fosters a broader systems perspective of sustainability and can make science more responsive to the needs of decision makers and the public. Successful transdisciplinary approaches require a common language and understanding of key concepts. Our primary objective is to encourage the ES research and policy communities to standardize terminology and definitions, to facilitate mutual understanding by multidisciplinary researchers and policy makers. As an important step toward standardization, we present a lexicon developed to inform ES research conducted by the US Environmental Protection Agency and its partners. We describe a straightforward conceptualization of the relationships among environmental decisions, their effects on ecological systems and the services they provide, and human well-being. This provides a framework for common understanding and use of ES terminology. We encourage challenges to these definitions and attempts to advance standardization of a lexicon in ways that might be more meaningful to our ultimate objective: informing environmental decisions in ways that promote the sustainability of the environment upon which we all depend.
© 2015 SETAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Definitions; Ecological benefits; Ecosystem services; Environmental decision making; Terminology

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25689771     DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag        ISSN: 1551-3777            Impact factor:   2.992


  13 in total

Review 1.  A framework for predicting impacts on ecosystem services from (sub)organismal responses to chemicals.

Authors:  Valery E Forbes; Chris J Salice; Bjorn Birnir; Randy J F Bruins; Peter Calow; Virginie Ducrot; Nika Galic; Kristina Garber; Bret C Harvey; Henriette Jager; Andrew Kanarek; Robert Pastorok; Steve F Railsback; Richard Rebarber; Pernille Thorbek
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.742

2.  Determining preferences for ecosystem benefits in Great Lakes Areas of Concern from photographs posted to social media.

Authors:  Ted R Angradi; Jonathon J Launspach; Rick Debbout
Journal:  J Great Lakes Res       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 2.480

3.  Ecosystem services in the Great Lakes.

Authors:  Alan D Steinman; Bradley J Cardinale; Wayne R Munns; Mary E Ogdahl; J David Allan; Ted Angadi; Sarah Bartlett; Kate Brauman; Muruleedhara Byappanahalli; Matt Doss; Diane Dupont; Annie Johns; Donna Kashian; Frank Lupi; Peter McIntyre; Todd Miller; Michael Moore; Rebecca Logsdon Muenich; Rajendra Poudel; James Price; Bill Provencher; Anne Rea; Jennifer Read; Steven Renzetti; Brent Sohngen; Erika Washburn
Journal:  J Great Lakes Res       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.480

4.  Toward the improvement of total nitrogen deposition budgets in the United States.

Authors:  J T Walker; G Beachley; H M Amos; J S Baron; J Bash; R Baumgardner; M D Bell; K B Benedict; X Chen; D W Clow; A Cole; J G Coughlin; K Cruz; R W Daly; S M Decina; E M Elliott; M E Fenn; L Ganzeveld; K Gebhart; S S Isil; B M Kerschner; R S Larson; T Lavery; G G Lear; T Macy; M A Mast; K Mishoe; K H Morris; P E Padgett; R V Pouyat; M Puchalski; H O T Pye; A W Rea; M F Rhodes; C M Rogers; R Saylor; R Scheffe; B A Schichtel; D B Schwede; G A Sexstone; B C Sive; R Sosa Echeverría; P H Templer; T Thompson; D Tong; G A Wetherbee; T H Whitlow; Z Wu; Z Yu; L Zhang
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Using ecological production functions to link ecological processes to ecosystem services.

Authors:  Randall Jf Bruins; Timothy J Canfield; Clifford Duke; Larry Kapustka; Amanda M Nahlik; Ralf B Schäfer
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.992

6.  Ecosystem services in risk assessment and management.

Authors:  Wayne R Munns; Veronique Poulsen; William R Gala; Stuart J Marshall; Anne W Rea; Mary T Sorensen; Katherine von Stackelberg
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 2.992

Review 7.  Eco-Health linkages: assessing the role of ecosystem goods and services on human health using causal criteria analysis.

Authors:  Rebeca de Jesus Crespo; Richard Fulford
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.380

8.  Downscaling a Human Well-Being Index for Environmental Management and Environmental Justice Applications in Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Susan H Yee; Elizabeth Paulukonis; Kyle D Buck
Journal:  Appl Geogr       Date:  2020-07-08

9.  Ecosystem services consideration in the remediation process for contaminated sites.

Authors:  Matthew C Harwell; Chloe Jackson; Michael Kravitz; Kira Lynch; Jewel Tomasula; Anne Neale; Michele Mahoney; Carlos Pachon; Karen Scheuermann; Gregory Grissom; Kristen Parry
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 6.789

Review 10.  The pros and cons of ecological risk assessment based on data from different levels of biological organization.

Authors:  Jason R Rohr; Christopher J Salice; Roger M Nisbet
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 6.184

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.