Literature DB >> 22594541

Using ecosystem services to inform decisions on U.S. air quality standards.

Anne W Rea1, Christine Davis, David A Evans, Brian T Heninger, George Van Houtven.   

Abstract

The ecosystem services (ES) framework provides a link between changes in a natural system's structure and function and public welfare. This systematic integration of ecology and economics allows for more consistency and transparency in environmental decision making by enabling valuation of nature's goods and services in a manner that is understood by the public. This policy analysis (1) assesses the utility of the ES conceptual framework in the context of setting a secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS), (2) describes how economic valuation was used to summarize changes in ES affected by NOx and SOx in the review, and (3) uses the secondary NOxSOx NAAQS review as a case study to highlight the advantages and challenges of quantifying air pollutant effects on ES in a decision making context. Using an ES framework can benefit the decision making process by accounting for environmental, ecological, and social elements in a holistic manner. As formal quantitative linkages are developed between ecosystem structure and function and ES, this framework will increasingly allow for a clearer, more transparent link between changes in air quality and public welfare.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22594541     DOI: 10.1021/es3003876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  6 in total

1.  Toward the improvement of total nitrogen deposition budgets in the United States.

Authors:  J T Walker; G Beachley; H M Amos; J S Baron; J Bash; R Baumgardner; M D Bell; K B Benedict; X Chen; D W Clow; A Cole; J G Coughlin; K Cruz; R W Daly; S M Decina; E M Elliott; M E Fenn; L Ganzeveld; K Gebhart; S S Isil; B M Kerschner; R S Larson; T Lavery; G G Lear; T Macy; M A Mast; K Mishoe; K H Morris; P E Padgett; R V Pouyat; M Puchalski; H O T Pye; A W Rea; M F Rhodes; C M Rogers; R Saylor; R Scheffe; B A Schichtel; D B Schwede; G A Sexstone; B C Sive; R Sosa Echeverría; P H Templer; T Thompson; D Tong; G A Wetherbee; T H Whitlow; Z Wu; Z Yu; L Zhang
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Ecosystem services in risk assessment and management.

Authors:  Wayne R Munns; Veronique Poulsen; William R Gala; Stuart J Marshall; Anne W Rea; Mary T Sorensen; Katherine von Stackelberg
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 2.992

3.  Ecosystem services consideration in the remediation process for contaminated sites.

Authors:  Matthew C Harwell; Chloe Jackson; Michael Kravitz; Kira Lynch; Jewel Tomasula; Anne Neale; Michele Mahoney; Carlos Pachon; Karen Scheuermann; Gregory Grissom; Kristen Parry
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 6.789

4.  Evolution of Monitoring and Modeling of Reactive Nitrogen Deposition in the United States.

Authors:  John T Walker; Greg Beachley
Journal:  EM (Pittsburgh Pa)       Date:  2019-07-19

5.  The social costs of nitrogen.

Authors:  Bonnie L Keeler; Jesse D Gourevitch; Stephen Polasky; Forest Isbell; Chris W Tessum; Jason D Hill; Julian D Marshall
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 14.136

6.  Synthesis of Two Decades of US EPA's Ecosystem Services Research to Inform Environmental, Community, and Sustainability Decision Making.

Authors:  Matthew C Harwell; Chloe A Jackson
Journal:  Sustainability       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 3.889

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.