Literature DB >> 33587146

Economic and environmental assessments of combined genetics and nutrition optimization strategies to improve the efficiency of sustainable pork production.

Tara Soleimani1, Susanne Hermesch2, Hélène Gilbert1.   

Abstract

We evaluated the economic and environmental impacts of strategies that incorporated selection for pig feed efficiency and dietary optimization based on a single or multiple objectives tailored to meet the population nutritional requirements, with the goal to optimize sustainable farm feed efficiency. The economic and environmental features of the strategy were evaluated using life cycle assessment (LCA) and bio-economic models. An individual trait-based LCA model was applied to evaluate global warming potential, terrestrial acidification potential, freshwater eutrophication potential (EP), and land occupation of the combined genetics and nutrition optimization to produce 1 kg of live pig weighing 120 kg at the farm gate. A parametric individual trait-based bio-economic model was developed and applied to determine the cost breakdown, revenue, and profit to be gained from a 120-kg live pig at the farm gate. Data from two genetic lines with contrasted levels of feed efficiency were used to apply the combined genetics and nutrition optimization: accounting for the average nutritional requirements for each line, the individual pig responses to diets formulated for least cost, least environmental impacts, or minimum combination of costs and environmental impacts objectives were predicted with INRAPorc. Significant differences in the environmental impacts (P < 0.0001) and profit (P < 0.05) between lines predicted with the same reference diet showed that selection for feed efficiency (residual feed intake) in pigs improves pig production sustainability. When pig responses were simulated with their line-optimized diets, except for EP, all the line environmental impacts were lower (P < 0.05) than with the reference diet. The high correlations of feed conversion ratio with the environmental impacts (> 0.82) and the profit (< -0.88) in both lines underlined the importance of feed efficiency as a lever for the sustainability of pig production systems. Implementing combined genetics and nutrition optimization, the inherent profit and environmental differences between the genetic lines were predicted to be reduced from 23.4% with the reference diet to 7.6% with the diet optimized jointly for economic and environmental objectives (joint diet). Consequently, for increased pig sustainability, diet optimization for sustainability objectives should be applied to cover the specific nutritional requirements arising in the herd from the pigs genetic level.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bio-economic model; environmental assessment; feed efficiency; genetic; pig; residual feed intake

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33587146      PMCID: PMC7999619          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skab051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  19 in total

1.  Modelling of manure production by pigs and NH3, N2O and CH4 emissions. Part I: animal excretion and enteric CH4, effect of feeding and performance.

Authors:  C Rigolot; S Espagnol; C Pomar; J-Y Dourmad
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Selection response and genetic parameters for residual feed intake in Yorkshire swine.

Authors:  W Cai; D S Casey; J C M Dekkers
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Genetic parameters for residual feed intake in growing pigs, with emphasis on genetic relationships with carcass and meat quality traits.

Authors:  H Gilbert; J-P Bidanel; J Gruand; J-C Caritez; Y Billon; P Guillouet; H Lagant; J Noblet; P Sellier
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Towards a methodology to formulate sustainable diets for livestock: accounting for environmental impact in diet formulation.

Authors:  S G Mackenzie; I Leinonen; N Ferguson; I Kyriazakis
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.718

5.  Effect of feeding strategy on environmental impacts of pig fattening in different contexts of production: evaluation through life cycle assessment.

Authors:  A N T R Monteiro; F Garcia-Launay; L Brossard; A Wilfart; J-Y Dourmad
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Correlated responses in sow appetite, residual feed intake, body composition, and reproduction after divergent selection for residual feed intake in the growing pig.

Authors:  H Gilbert; J-P Bidanel; Y Billon; H Lagant; P Guillouet; P Sellier; J Noblet; S Hermesch
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  ECOALIM: A Dataset of Environmental Impacts of Feed Ingredients Used in French Animal Production.

Authors:  Aurélie Wilfart; Sandrine Espagnol; Sylvie Dauguet; Aurélie Tailleur; Armelle Gac; Florence Garcia-Launay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A stochastic bio-economic pig farm model to assess the impact of innovations on farm performance.

Authors:  B M Ali; P B M Berentsen; J W M Bastiaansen; A Oude Lansink
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Review: divergent selection for residual feed intake in the growing pig.

Authors:  H Gilbert; Y Billon; L Brossard; J Faure; P Gatellier; F Gondret; E Labussière; B Lebret; L Lefaucheur; N Le Floch; I Louveau; E Merlot; M-C Meunier-Salaün; L Montagne; P Mormede; D Renaudeau; J Riquet; C Rogel-Gaillard; J van Milgen; A Vincent; J Noblet
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Environmental trade-offs of pig production systems under varied operational efficiencies.

Authors:  G A McAuliffe; T Takahashi; L Mogensen; J E Hermansen; C L Sage; D V Chapman; M R F Lee
Journal:  J Clean Prod       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 9.297

View more
  2 in total

1.  Soy protein concentrate replacing animal protein supplements and its impacts on intestinal immune status, intestinal oxidative stress status, nutrient digestibility, mucosa-associated microbiota, and growth performance of nursery pigs.

Authors:  Zixiao Deng; Marcos Elias Duarte; Ki Beom Jang; Sung Woo Kim
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 3.338

2.  Genome-Wide Association Analysis and Genetic Parameters for Feed Efficiency and Related Traits in Yorkshire and Duroc Pigs.

Authors:  Weining Li; Zhaojun Wang; Shenghao Luo; Jianliang Wu; Lei Zhou; Jianfeng Liu
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 3.231

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.