Literature DB >> 29022521

A stochastic bio-economic pig farm model to assess the impact of innovations on farm performance.

B M Ali1, P B M Berentsen1, J W M Bastiaansen2, A Oude Lansink1.   

Abstract

Recently developed innovations may improve the economic and environmental sustainability of pig production systems. Generic models are needed to assess the impact of innovations on farm performance. Here we developed a stochastic bio-economic farm model for a typical farrow-to-finish pig farm to assess the impact of innovations on private and social profits. The model accounts for emissions of greenhouse gases from feed production and manure by using the shadow price of CO2, and for stochasticity of economic and biological parameters. The model was applied to assess the impact of using locally produced alternative feed sources (i.e. co-products) in the diets of finishing pigs on private and social profits of a typical Brazilian farrow-to-finish pig farm. Three cases were defined: a reference case (with a standard corn-soybean meal-based finishing diet), a macaúba case (with a macaúba kernel cake-based finishing diet) and a co-products case (with a co-products-based finishing diet). Pigs were assumed to be fed to equal net energy intakes in the three cases. Social profits are 34% to 38% lower than private profits in the three cases. Private and social profits are about 11% and 14% higher for the macaúba case than the reference case, whereas they are 3% and 7% lower for the co-products case, respectively. Environmental costs are higher under the alternative cases than the reference case suggesting that other benefits (e.g. costs and land use) should be considered to utilize co-products. The CV of farm profits is between 75% and 87% in the three cases following from the volatility of prices over time and variations in biological parameters between fattening pigs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bio-economic model; environmental impact; pigs; profit; stochasticity

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29022521     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731117002531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  2 in total

1.  Response to a selection index including environmental costs and risk preferences of producers.

Authors:  Beshir M Ali; John W M Bastiaansen; Yann de Mey; Alfons G J M Oude Lansink
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Economic and environmental assessments of combined genetics and nutrition optimization strategies to improve the efficiency of sustainable pork production.

Authors:  Tara Soleimani; Susanne Hermesch; Hélène Gilbert
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.