Literature DB >> 33585593

Suitability of Slower Growing Commercial Turkey Strains for Organic Husbandry in Terms of Animal Welfare and Performance.

Anna Olschewsky1, Katharina Riehn2, Ute Knierim1.   

Abstract

Intensive turkey production with fast growing strains is often critically discussed regarding animal welfare problems. Studies evaluating the welfare status of both organic and less intensive selected turkey strains are limited, except in the slightly slower growing Kelly Broad Breast Bronze (Kelly). The aim of this study was to assess the welfare of turkeys from two strains with further decreased growth rate, Hockenhull Large Bronze (HoBr) and Hockenhull Black (HoBl), in comparison to Kelly under commercial organic conditions with 100% organic feed. Altogether 844 non-beak-trimmed male turkeys (274-288 per line) were reared and fattened in three replications with each six groups. On group level, use of resources in the 7, 16, and 25th week of life, mortality and feed conversion were recorded. Each bird was assessed with regard to plumage and skin condition as indicators of agonistic interactions, cannibalism and feather pecking, with regard to leg health, footpad, breast skin condition and, as performance indicators, live and carcass weight, utilization, daily weight gain and weights of valuable meat parts. The significantly slower growing HoBl showed slightly fewer malposition of the legs, reduced injury rates and less breast buttons, but a higher susceptibility to footpad dermatitis than Kelly turkeys. HoBr with a similar growth rate compared to Kelly had slightly more problems concerning walking ability and plumage damage, but also less breast buttons than Kelly turkeys. However, effect sizes were negligible (Φ < 0.10), except for the higher occurrence of footpad dermatitis and the reduced number of breast buttons in HoBl with small effect sizes (Φ = 0.20-0.24). Use of resources, prevalence of breast blisters and mortality, were not statistically different, although mortality rate was numerically lower in HoBl. Thus, for none of the studied strains clear benefits or disadvantages in terms of the birds' predisposition for welfare problems could be identified. Overall, prevalences of animal welfare problems were mostly lower than in comparable studies while performances were comparatively high. Therefore, turkeys from the studied strains appear to be suitable for organic rearing and fattening with 100% organic feed, given a good management.
Copyright © 2021 Olschewsky, Riehn and Knierim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal welfare; behavior; health; performance; turkey strains

Year:  2021        PMID: 33585593      PMCID: PMC7873929          DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.600846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Vet Sci        ISSN: 2297-1769


  9 in total

1.  Wet litter as a cause of plantar pododermatitis, leading to foot ulceration and lameness in fattening turkeys.

Authors:  M F Martland
Journal:  Avian Pathol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.378

2.  Structure and age-dependent development of the turkey liver: a comparative study of a highly selected meat-type and a wild-type turkey line.

Authors:  Hana Hünigen; Kathleen Mainzer; Ruth M Hirschberg; Pia Custodis; Ole Gemeinhardt; Salah Al Masri; Kenneth C Richardson; Hafez Mohamed Hafez; Johanna Plendl
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Experimental infections with the protozoan parasite Histomonas meleagridis: a review.

Authors:  Rüdiger Hauck; Hafez M Hafez
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 2.289

4.  Examinations on the prevalence of footpad lesions and breast skin lesions in B.U.T. Big 6 fattening turkeys in Germany. Part II: Prevalence of breast skin lesions (breast buttons and breast blisters).

Authors:  H Mitterer-Istyagin; M Ludewig; T Bartels; M-E Krautwald-Junghanns; R Ellerich; E Schuster; J Berk; S Petermann; K Fehlhaber
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Examinations on the prevalence of footpad lesions and breast skin lesions in British United Turkeys Big 6 fattening turkeys in Germany. Part I: prevalence of footpad lesions.

Authors:  M-E Krautwald-Junghanns; R Ellerich; H Mitterer-Istyagin; M Ludewig; K Fehlhaber; E Schuster; J Berk; S Petermann; T Bartels
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Prevalence of skin lesions in turkeys at slaughter.

Authors:  V Allain; D Huonnic; M Rouina; V Michel
Journal:  Br Poult Sci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.095

Review 7.  Review of the social and environmental factors affecting the behavior and welfare of turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo).

Authors:  J Marchewka; T T N Watanabe; V Ferrante; I Estevez
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  The influence of genetic increases in shank width on body weight, walking ability, and reproduction of turkeys.

Authors:  K E Nestor; W L Bacon; Y M Saif; P A Renner
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Focal ulcerative dermatitis ("breast buttons") in marketed turkeys.

Authors:  E Gonder; H J Barnes
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  1987 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.577

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Welfare of domestic birds and rabbits transported in containers.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Christian Gortázar Schmidt; Mette Herskin; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Barbara Padalino; Helen Clare Roberts; Hans Spoolder; Karl Stahl; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Malcolm Mitchell; Leonardo James Vinco; Eva Voslarova; Denise Candiani; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Yves Van der Stede; Antonio Velarde
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-09-07

2.  The Prevalence of Integument Injuries and Associated Risk Factors Among Canadian Turkeys.

Authors:  Emily M Leishman; Nienke van Staaveren; Vern R Osborne; Benjamin J Wood; Christine F Baes; Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-01-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.