Literature DB >> 36092767

Welfare of domestic birds and rabbits transported in containers.

Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Julio Alvarez, Dominique Joseph Bicout, Paolo Calistri, Elisabetta Canali, Julian Ashley Drewe, Bruno Garin-Bastuji, Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas, Christian Gortázar Schmidt, Mette Herskin, Virginie Michel, Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca, Barbara Padalino, Helen Clare Roberts, Hans Spoolder, Karl Stahl, Arvo Viltrop, Christoph Winckler, Malcolm Mitchell, Leonardo James Vinco, Eva Voslarova, Denise Candiani, Olaf Mosbach-Schulz, Yves Van der Stede, Antonio Velarde.   

Abstract

This opinion, produced upon a request from the European Commission, focuses on transport of domestic birds and rabbits in containers (e.g. any crate, box, receptacle or other rigid structure used for the transport of animals, but not the means of transport itself). It describes and assesses current transport practices in the EU, based on data from literature, Member States and expert opinion. The species and categories of domestic birds assessed were mainly chickens for meat (broilers), end-of-lay hens and day-old chicks. They included to a lesser extent pullets, turkeys, ducks, geese, quails and game birds, due to limited scientific evidence. The opinion focuses on road transport to slaughterhouses or to production sites. For day-old chicks, air transport is also addressed. The relevant stages of transport considered are preparation, loading, journey, arrival and uncrating. Welfare consequences associated with current transport practices were identified for each stage. For loading and uncrating, the highly relevant welfare consequences identified are handling stress, injuries, restriction of movement and sensory overstimulation. For the journey and arrival, injuries, restriction of movement, sensory overstimulation, motion stress, heat stress, cold stress, prolonged hunger and prolonged thirst are identified as highly relevant. For each welfare consequence, animal-based measures (ABMs) and hazards were identified and assessed, and both preventive and corrective or mitigative measures proposed. Recommendations on quantitative criteria to prevent or mitigate welfare consequences are provided for microclimatic conditions, space allowances and journey times for all categories of animals, where scientific evidence and expert opinion support such outcomes.
© 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal transport; animal‐based measures (ABMs); domestic birds; poultry; preventive/corrective/mitigative measures; rabbits; welfare consequences

Year:  2022        PMID: 36092767      PMCID: PMC9449994          DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EFSA J        ISSN: 1831-4732


  200 in total

1.  Self-selection of the analgesic drug carprofen by lame broiler chickens.

Authors:  T C Danbury; C A Weeks; J P Chambers; A E Waterman-Pearson; S C Kestin
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2000-03-11       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  Effect of catching method on the prevalence of broken bones in end of lay hens.

Authors:  N G Gregory; L J Wilkins; S D Austin; C G Belyavin; D M Alvey; S A Tucker
Journal:  Avian Pathol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.378

Review 3.  Beyond maternal effects in birds: responses of the embryo to the environment.

Authors:  Wendy L Reed; Mark E Clark
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 3.326

4.  Health and welfare of rabbits farmed in different production systems.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Klaus Depner; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Christian Gortázar Schmidt; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Helen Clare Roberts; Liisa Helena Sihvonen; Hans Spoolder; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde Calvo; Arvo Viltrop; Stephanie Buijs; Sandra Edwards; Denise Candiani; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Yves Van der Stede; Christoph Winckler
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2020-01-09

5.  Methodological guidance for the development of animal welfare mandates in the context of the Farm to Fork Strategy.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Christian Gortázar Schmidt; Mette Herskin; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Virginie Michel; Barbara Padalino; Paolo Pasquali; Helen Clare Roberts; Hans Spoolder; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Sandra Edwards; Sean Ashe; Denise Candiani; Chiara Fabris; Eliana Lima; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Cristina Rojo Gimeno; Yves Van der Stede; Marika Vitali; Christoph Winckler
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-07-12

6.  Influence of different handling methods and crating periods on plasma corticosterone concentrations in broilers.

Authors:  G Kannan; J A Mench
Journal:  Br Poult Sci       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.095

7.  Effect of chick body temperature during post-hatch handling on broiler live performance.

Authors:  A Hamissou Maman; S Özlü; A Uçar; O Elibol
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Osmotic and volemic regulation of plasma arginine vasotocin in conscious domestic fowl.

Authors:  J N Stallone; E J Braun
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1986-04

9.  Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessments.

Authors:  Diane Benford; Thorhallur Halldorsson; Michael John Jeger; Helle Katrine Knutsen; Simon More; Hanspeter Naegeli; Hubert Noteborn; Colin Ockleford; Antonia Ricci; Guido Rychen; Josef R Schlatter; Vittorio Silano; Roland Solecki; Dominique Turck; Maged Younes; Peter Craig; Andrew Hart; Natalie Von Goetz; Kostas Koutsoumanis; Alicja Mortensen; Bernadette Ossendorp; Laura Martino; Caroline Merten; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Anthony Hardy
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2018-01-24

10.  Simulated transport of well- and poor-feathered brown-strain end-of-cycle hens and the impact on stress physiology, behavior, and meat quality.

Authors:  K Beaulac; T G Crowe; K Schwean-Lardner
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.