Literature DB >> 21406362

Examinations on the prevalence of footpad lesions and breast skin lesions in B.U.T. Big 6 fattening turkeys in Germany. Part II: Prevalence of breast skin lesions (breast buttons and breast blisters).

H Mitterer-Istyagin1, M Ludewig, T Bartels, M-E Krautwald-Junghanns, R Ellerich, E Schuster, J Berk, S Petermann, K Fehlhaber.   

Abstract

This project involves the prevalence of breast skin alterations (breast buttons, blisters, purulent bursitis) in male and female fattened turkeys (British United Turkeys Big 6) from conventional intensive farming. In this case, 24 turkey farms across Germany and 11,860 turkeys (5,740 toms, 6,120 hens) were clinically examined, and 16,200 birds (8,400 hens, 7,800 toms) were evaluated on slaughter lines at 7 turkey abattoirs. Each turkey farm included examination of at least 3 consecutive fattening cycles. Especially in the meat examinations, breast skin alterations were a frequent discovery, particularly in the form of breast buttons. The turkey toms exhibited a prevalence of 27.15%, and the toms were affected significantly more frequently (P < 0.001) by these variations than the turkey hens (7.77%). It is possible that the higher BW of the male specimens leads to increased lying times and is therefore connected with more severe strain on the breast region. The increased fattening period of the turkey toms (slaughtering at wk 21 to 22 of life) vs. the female specimens (slaughtering at wk 15 to 17 of life) must be discussed as a cause. Breast blisters and bursitis sternalis were discovered with a prevalence of 7.36 and 1.24% in toms and more seldom in hens, at 0.30% and 0.15%. Large differences in prevalence were partially recognizable between individual farms as well as between the 3 fattening cycles on a farm. Breast buttons and breast blisters are pathological skin variations for which the etiology is multifactorial. Clear correlations between the prevalence of breast skin alterations and the manner of rearing the birds were not able to be determined. An improvement in this situation, which is considered very problematic from the perspective of bird protection and economics, may be achieved only via cooperation to achieve optimized rearing methods, management, and breeding practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21406362     DOI: 10.3382/ps.2010-01142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  5 in total

1.  Tissue tropism of Toxoplasma gondii in turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) after parenteral infection.

Authors:  B Zöller; M Koethe; M Ludewig; S Pott; A Daugschies; R K Straubinger; K Fehlhaber; B Bangoura
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Impact of Selected Factors on the Occurrence of Contact Dermatitis in Turkeys on Commercial Farms in Germany.

Authors:  Maria-Elisabeth Krautwald-Junghanns; Shana Bergmann; Michael H Erhard; Karsten Fehlhaber; Jens Hübel; Martina Ludewig; Heike Mitterer-Istyagin; Nina Ziegler; Thomas Bartels
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Farmers' Perceptions About Health and Welfare Issues in Turkey Production.

Authors:  Nienke van Staaveren; Emily M Leishman; Benjamin J Wood; Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek; Christine F Baes
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-06-12

4.  Suitability of Slower Growing Commercial Turkey Strains for Organic Husbandry in Terms of Animal Welfare and Performance.

Authors:  Anna Olschewsky; Katharina Riehn; Ute Knierim
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-01-06

5.  Associations between on-farm welfare measures and slaughterhouse data in commercial flocks of turkey hens (Meleagris gallopavo).

Authors:  Joanna Marchewka; Guro Vasdal; Randi O Moe
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.352

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.