Literature DB >> 33583429

Impact of tearing spermatic cords during castration in live and dead piglets and consequences on welfare.

Simone M Schmid1, Chiara I Genter1, Céline Heinemann1, Julia Steinhoff-Wagner2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the tearing of tissues during castration is forbidden in the EU, it is still routinely applied in many countries. The goal of this study was to evaluate vocalizations and movements of male piglets undergoing castration by applying different techniques and pain treatments based on scores under practical conditions (Trial 1, n = 50) and to investigate anatomical features after castration of dead piglets with different techniques (Trial 2, n = 28).
RESULTS: In Trial 1, treatment groups did not significantly influence the duration of castration. Both the duration of vocalization and the scores for vocalizations and movements were lower in piglets castrated under general anesthesia (P < 0.05). Behavior scores in conscious piglets did not differ. The incision and extraction caused lower vocalizations and movements than the pulling and severing of spermatic cords (P < 0.01). Movements were more intense during tearing of the spermatic cords than during cutting at the first and second severing (P < 0.01). In both trials, the remains of spermatic cords protruded tendentially more often from castration wounds after severing by tearing (P < 0.09). In Trial 2, the minimum, mean and maximum lengths of the testicles and spermatic cords were extended when severing was realized by tearing (P < 0.01). The mean relative testicle weight of 1.05‰ in dead piglets castrated by tearing was larger than that in dead piglets castrated by cutting (0.91‰) (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The trials uncovered significant differences between behavior expressed by piglets castrated by tearing or cutting, indicating a higher pain level in the tearing group. It was found that the castration technique tearing increased the amount of removed tissues and might cause intraabdominal damage to the remaining tissues and vessels in a yet unknown dimension. These findings should be considered for implementation and stricter enforcement of the ban on tearing for castration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal health; Animal welfare; Castration management; Mutilation; Pain assessment; Pain behavior; Pork production

Year:  2021        PMID: 33583429      PMCID: PMC7883445          DOI: 10.1186/s40813-021-00200-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Porcine Health Manag        ISSN: 2055-5660


  20 in total

1.  Vocal responses of piglets to castration: identifying procedural sources of pain.

Authors: 
Journal:  Appl Anim Behav Sci       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 2.448

2.  Practice on castration of piglets in Europe.

Authors:  B Fredriksen; M Font I Furnols; K Lundström; W Migdal; A Prunier; F A M Tuyttens; M Bonneau
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Pre-emptive meloxicam for postoperative analgesia in piglets undergoing surgical castration.

Authors:  Alassane Keita; Eric Pagot; Armelle Prunier; Christian Guidarini
Journal:  Vet Anaesth Analg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.648

4.  Scoring systems: predictive accuracy through specificity.

Authors:  Madeleine Poirier; N Joseph Espat
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  The physiological and behavioral response of pigs castrated with and without anesthesia or analgesia.

Authors:  M A Sutherland; B L Davis; T A Brooks; J F Coetzee
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Postnatal piglet husbandry practices and well-being: the effects of alternative techniques delivered in combination.

Authors:  J N Marchant-Forde; D C Lay; K A McMunn; H W Cheng; E A Pajor; R M Marchant-Forde
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Postnatal piglet husbandry practices and well-being: the effects of alternative techniques delivered separately.

Authors:  J N Marchant-Forde; D C Lay; K A McMunn; H W Cheng; E A Pajor; R M Marchant-Forde
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Vocalization and physiological response of pigs during castration with or without a local anesthetic.

Authors:  R G White; J A DeShazer; C J Tressler; G M Borcher; S Davey; A Waninge; A M Parkhurst; M J Milanuk; E T Clemens
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  [Pain and distress response of suckling piglets to injection and castration under local anaesthesia with procaine and licocaine - Part 2: Defence behaviour, catecholamines, coordination of movements].

Authors:  Anna Rauh; Katharina Hofmann; Jürgen Harlizius; Christine Weiß; Jasmin Numberger; Tobias Scholz; Theodor Schulze-Horsel; Winfried Otten; Mathias Ritzmann; Susanne Zöls
Journal:  Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 0.488

10.  Topical wound anaesthesia: efficacy to mitigate piglet castration pain.

Authors:  M L Sheil; M Chambers; B Sharpe
Journal:  Aust Vet J       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 1.281

View more
  2 in total

1.  Welfare of pigs on farm.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Gortázar Schmidt; Mette Herskin; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Barbara Padalino; Helen Clare Roberts; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Sandra Edwards; Sonya Ivanova; Christine Leeb; Beat Wechsler; Chiara Fabris; Eliana Lima; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Yves Van der Stede; Marika Vitali; Hans Spoolder
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-08-25

Review 2.  Linking Animal Welfare and Antibiotic Use in Pig Farming-A Review.

Authors:  Rita Albernaz-Gonçalves; Gabriela Olmos Antillón; Maria José Hötzel
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 2.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.