Literature DB >> 18997073

Postnatal piglet husbandry practices and well-being: the effects of alternative techniques delivered separately.

J N Marchant-Forde1, D C Lay, K A McMunn, H W Cheng, E A Pajor, R M Marchant-Forde.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate stress responses evoked by 2 alternative methods for performing the following processing procedures: 1) teeth resection-clipping vs. grinding; 2) tail docking-cold vs. hot clipping; 3) identification-ear notch vs. tag; 4) iron administration-injection vs. oral; 5) castration-cords cut vs. torn. Eight to 10 litters of 8-, 2-, and 3-d-old piglets were assigned to each procedure. Within each litter, 2 piglets were assigned to 1 of 4 possible procedures: the 2 alternative methods, a sham procedure, and a sham procedure plus blood sampling. Blood was sampled before processing and at 45 min, 4 h, 48 h, 1 wk, and 2 wk postprocedure and assayed for cortisol and beta-endorphin. Procedures were videotaped and analyzed to evaluate the time taken to perform the procedure and the number of squeals, grunts, and escape attempts. Vocalizations were analyzed to determine mean and peak frequencies and duration. Piglets were weighed before the procedure and at 24 h, 48 h, 1 wk, and 2 wk afterward. Lesions were scored on a scale of 0 to 5 on pigs in the identification, tail docking, and castration treatments at 24 h, 1 wk, and 2 wk postprocedure. For teeth resection, grinding took longer than clipping and resulted in greater cortisol concentration overall, poorer growth rates, and longer vocalizations compared with pigs in the control treatment (P<0.05). For tail docking, hot clipping took longer, and hot-clipped piglets grew slower than cold-clipped piglets (P<0.05). Hot clipping also resulted in longer and higher frequency squealing compared with pigs in the control treatment (P<0.01). For identification, ear notching took longer than tagging, and ear-notched piglets had worse wound scores than tagged piglets (P<0.05). Cortisol concentrations at 4 h also tended to be greater for ear-notched piglets (P<0.10). Ear notching evoked calls with higher peak frequencies than the control treatments. For iron administration, oral delivery took numerically longer than injecting, but there were no significant differences between injecting and oral delivery for any of the measures. For castration, tearing took longer than cutting the cords (P<0.05), but beta-endorphin concentrations at 45 min postprocedure were greater for cut piglets. When measures of behavior, physiology, and productivity were used, the responses to teeth resection, tail docking, and identification were shown to be altered by the procedural method, whereas responses to iron administration and castration did not differ. The time taken to carry out the procedure would appear to be an important factor in the strength of the stress response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18997073     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2008-1080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  22 in total

1.  Transmammary delivery of firocoxib to piglets reduces stress and improves average daily gain after castration, tail docking, and teeth clipping1.

Authors:  Johann F Coetzee; Pritam K Sidhu; Jon Seagen; Teresa Schieber; Katie Kleinhenz; Michael D Kleinhenz; Larry W Wulf; Vickie L Cooper; Reza Mazloom; Majid Jaberi-Douraki; Kelly Lechtenberg
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Individual stability in vocalization rates of preweaning piglets.

Authors:  M Špinka; M Syrová; R Policht; P Linhart
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Pain-Suppressed Behaviors in the Red-tailed Hawk (Buteo jamaicensis).

Authors:  Jana E Mazor-Thomas; Phyllis E Mann; Alicia Z Karas; Flo Tseng
Journal:  Appl Anim Behav Sci       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 2.448

4.  Welfare of pigs on farm.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Gortázar Schmidt; Mette Herskin; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Barbara Padalino; Helen Clare Roberts; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Sandra Edwards; Sonya Ivanova; Christine Leeb; Beat Wechsler; Chiara Fabris; Eliana Lima; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Yves Van der Stede; Marika Vitali; Hans Spoolder
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-08-25

5.  Impact of transmammary-delivered meloxicam on biomarkers of pain and distress in piglets after castration and tail docking.

Authors:  Jessica L Bates; Locke A Karriker; Matthew L Stock; Kelly M Pertzborn; Luke G Baldwin; Larry W Wulf; C J Lee; Chong Wang; Johann F Coetzee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Histopathological Characterization of Tail Injury and Traumatic Neuroma Development after Tail Docking in Piglets.

Authors:  D A Sandercock; S H Smith; P Di Giminiani; S A Edwards
Journal:  J Comp Pathol       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 1.311

7.  The Assessment of Facial Expressions in Piglets Undergoing Tail Docking and Castration: Toward the Development of the Piglet Grimace Scale.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Di Giminiani; Victoria L M H Brierley; Annalisa Scollo; Flaviana Gottardo; Emma M Malcolm; Sandra A Edwards; Matthew C Leach
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-11-14

8.  Pig castration: will the EU manage to ban pig castration by 2018?

Authors:  Nancy De Briyne; Charlotte Berg; Thomas Blaha; Déborah Temple
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2016-12-20

Review 9.  Save the pig tail.

Authors:  Anna Valros; Mari Heinonen
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2015-04-16

Review 10.  A Review of Pain Assessment in Pigs.

Authors:  Sarah H Ison; R Eddie Clutton; Pierpaolo Di Giminiani; Kenneth M D Rutherford
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-11-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.