Literature DB >> 22266989

The physiological and behavioral response of pigs castrated with and without anesthesia or analgesia.

M A Sutherland1, B L Davis, T A Brooks, J F Coetzee.   

Abstract

Surgical castration is a common management practice performed on male pigs to prevent the occurrence of boar taint. Surgical castration is known to cause physiological and behavioral changes in pigs indicative of pain-induced distress; however, it is commonly performed without pain relief. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of carbon dioxide gas (CO(2)) anesthesia and a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) to alleviate the pain caused by castration. At 3 d of age, male pigs were either control handled (CON), castrated without pain relief (CAS), given an NSAID and then immediately castrated (CAS+NSAID), anesthetized with CO(2) and then castrated (CAS+CO2), or anesthetized with CO(2) and given an NSAID at the time of castration (CAS+BOTH). Blood samples were collected before castration, and at 30, 60, 120, and 180 min, 24 h, and 3 d after castration or handling for analysis of cortisol, C-Reactive protein (CRP), and substance-P (SP) concentrations. This study was then repeated using the same treatment groups, and the behavioral response to castration and handling were measured using a 1-min scan sampling procedure. The percentage of stress vocalizations was recorded during the administration of all treatments. Anesthesia and analgesia did not effectively reduce (P > 0.05) the cortisol response to surgical castration. Overall, CRP concentrations were greater (P < 0.05) in CAS+CO2 pigs as compared with CON pigs. Sixty minutes after castration or handling, SP concentrations were greater (P < 0.08) in pigs given CO(2) anesthesia (CO2, CAS+CO2, and CAS+BOTH) than CON, CAS, and CAS+NSAID pigs. Pigs castrated without pain relief spent more (P < 0.001) time lying without contact than all other treatments during the first 30 min after castration, but thereafter CAS+CO2 pigs spent more (P < 0.001) time lying without contact than other treatments. During the first 30 min after the treatments were applied, CAS+CO2 pigs spent more (P < 0.01) time displaying pain-like behaviors than CON, CAS, CAS+NSAID, and CAS+BOTH pigs. The percentage of stress vocalizations was greater (P < 0.05) in CAS and CAS+NSAID pigs than all other treatments. Neither CO(2) anesthesia nor a NSAID, given separately or combined, markedly reduced the pain-induced distress caused by castration in pigs. More research is needed to evaluate practical methods of on-farm pain relief for pigs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22266989     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2011-4260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  20 in total

1.  Effects of tail docking and tail biting on performance and welfare of growing-finishing pigs in a confinement housing system.

Authors:  Y Z Li; H F Zhang; L J Johnston; W Martin; J D Peterson; J F Coetzee
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Welfare of pigs on farm.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Gortázar Schmidt; Mette Herskin; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Barbara Padalino; Helen Clare Roberts; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Sandra Edwards; Sonya Ivanova; Christine Leeb; Beat Wechsler; Chiara Fabris; Eliana Lima; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Yves Van der Stede; Marika Vitali; Hans Spoolder
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-08-25

3.  Validation of the UNESP-Botucatu pig composite acute pain scale (UPAPS).

Authors:  Stelio Pacca Loureiro Luna; Ana Lucélia de Araújo; Pedro Isidro da Nóbrega Neto; Juliana Tabarelli Brondani; Flávia Augusta de Oliveira; Liliane Marinho Dos Santos Azerêdo; Felipe Garcia Telles; Pedro Henrique Esteves Trindade
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The Future of Pork Production in the World: Towards Sustainable, Welfare-Positive Systems.

Authors:  John J McGlone
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 5.  Pain assessment in animal models: do we need further studies?

Authors:  Carmelo Gigliuto; Manuela De Gregori; Valentina Malafoglia; William Raffaeli; Christian Compagnone; Livia Visai; Paola Petrini; Maria Antonietta Avanzini; Carolina Muscoli; Jacopo Viganò; Francesco Calabrese; Tommaso Dominioni; Massimo Allegri; Lorenzo Cobianchi
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 3.133

6.  Impact of transmammary-delivered meloxicam on biomarkers of pain and distress in piglets after castration and tail docking.

Authors:  Jessica L Bates; Locke A Karriker; Matthew L Stock; Kelly M Pertzborn; Luke G Baldwin; Larry W Wulf; C J Lee; Chong Wang; Johann F Coetzee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Assessment of Facial Expressions in Piglets Undergoing Tail Docking and Castration: Toward the Development of the Piglet Grimace Scale.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Di Giminiani; Victoria L M H Brierley; Annalisa Scollo; Flaviana Gottardo; Emma M Malcolm; Sandra A Edwards; Matthew C Leach
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-11-14

8.  Comparison of Intramuscular or Subcutaneous Injections vs. Castration in Pigs-Impacts on Behavior and Welfare.

Authors:  John McGlone; Kimberly Guay; Arlene Garcia
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 9.  Pain Management in Farm Animals: Focus on Cattle, Sheep and Pigs.

Authors:  Paulo V Steagall; Hedie Bustamante; Craig B Johnson; Patricia V Turner
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 10.  A Review of Pain Assessment in Pigs.

Authors:  Sarah H Ison; R Eddie Clutton; Pierpaolo Di Giminiani; Kenneth M D Rutherford
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-11-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.