Literature DB >> 24492555

Postnatal piglet husbandry practices and well-being: the effects of alternative techniques delivered in combination.

J N Marchant-Forde1, D C Lay, K A McMunn, H W Cheng, E A Pajor, R M Marchant-Forde.   

Abstract

After birth, piglets undergo procedures likely to cause stress. The aim of this study was to evaluate stress responses evoked by 2 combinations (More Stressful [all a] or Less Stressful [all a] or More Stressful [all b]) of alternative methods for performing the following processing procedures: 1) teeth resection (TR) – [a] clip vs. [b] grind; 2) identification (ID) – [a] ear tag vs. [b] ear notch; 3)iron administration (FE) – [a] inject vs. [b] oral; 4) castration (CA) – [a] cords cut vs. [b] cords torn; 5) taildocking (TD) – [a] cold clip vs. [b] hot clip [corrected]. Ten litters of eight 2- and 3-d-old piglets were assigned to each procedure. Within each litter 1 male and 1 female piglet was assigned to 1 of 4 possible procedures: the 2 combinations, sham procedures, and sham procedures plus blood sampling. Blood was collected before processing and at 45 min, 4 h, 48 h, 1 wk, and 2 wk afterward and assayed for cortisol and β-endorphin concentrations. Procedures were videotaped and analyzed to evaluate the time taken to perform the procedure and the number of squeals, grunts, and escape attempts. Vocalizations were analyzed to determine mean and peak frequencies and duration. Piglets were weighed before the procedure and at 24 h, 48 h, 1 wk, and 2 wk afterward. Identification, tail docking, and castration lesions were scored on a 0 to 5 scale at 24 h, 1 wk, and 2 wk postprocedure. Both combinations of methods took longer to carry out than sham procedures and resulted in more squeals, grunts, and escape attempts during the procedures and higher peak frequencies of vocalizations compared with the control treatments (P < 0.05). Cortisol concentrations 45 min after processing were also higher in the 2 combination treatments than in the sham treatments (P < 0.05). Comparing between procedure treatments, the More Stressful combination of methods took longer to carry out, resulted in higher β-endorphin concentrations at 1 wk, had higher peak frequency of vocalizations, and increased ear (P < 0.05) and tail wound (P < 0.1) lesion scores at 1 wk than the Less Stressful combination. Growth during d 2 to 7 postprocedure was lower in More Stressful piglets than control piglets (P < 0.05) but by 2 wk, growth was unaffected. Using measures of behavior, physiology, and productivity, the More Stressful combination of procedures decreased welfare relative to the Less Stressful combination; however, both combinations decreased welfare relative to controls. The time taken to carry out the procedure would appear to be an important factor in the strength of the stress response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24492555     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2013-6929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  9 in total

1.  Individual stability in vocalization rates of preweaning piglets.

Authors:  M Špinka; M Syrová; R Policht; P Linhart
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Welfare of pigs on farm.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Gortázar Schmidt; Mette Herskin; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Barbara Padalino; Helen Clare Roberts; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Sandra Edwards; Sonya Ivanova; Christine Leeb; Beat Wechsler; Chiara Fabris; Eliana Lima; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Yves Van der Stede; Marika Vitali; Hans Spoolder
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-08-25

3.  Human Relationships with Domestic and Other Animals: One Health, One Welfare, One Biology.

Authors:  Ariel M Tarazona; Maria C Ceballos; Donald M Broom
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Review: Early life predisposing factors for biting in pigs.

Authors:  A Prunier; X Averos; I Dimitrov; S A Edwards; E Hillmann; M Holinger; V Ilieski; R Leming; C Tallet; S P Turner; M Zupan; I Camerlink
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Impact of tearing spermatic cords during castration in live and dead piglets and consequences on welfare.

Authors:  Simone M Schmid; Chiara I Genter; Céline Heinemann; Julia Steinhoff-Wagner
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2021-02-14

6.  Effects of Positive Human Contact during Gestation on the Behaviour, Physiology and Reproductive Performance of Sows.

Authors:  Megan E Hayes; Lauren M Hemsworth; Rebecca S Morrison; Kym L Butler; Maxine Rice; Jean-Loup Rault; Paul H Hemsworth
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Evaluating the utility of a CO2 surgical laser for piglet castration to reduce pain and improve wound healing: a pilot study.

Authors:  Abbie V Viscardi; Charley A Cull; Michael D Kleinhenz; Shawnee Montgomery; Andrew Curtis; Kelly Lechtenberg; Johann F Coetzee
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 8.  Linking Animal Welfare and Antibiotic Use in Pig Farming-A Review.

Authors:  Rita Albernaz-Gonçalves; Gabriela Olmos Antillón; Maria José Hötzel
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 9.  Impact of Routine Management Procedures on the Welfare of Suckling Piglets.

Authors:  Simone M Schmid; Julia Steinhoff-Wagner
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-01-17
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.