Literature DB >> 27851729

In vivo genome editing via CRISPR/Cas9 mediated homology-independent targeted integration.

Keiichiro Suzuki1, Yuji Tsunekawa2, Reyna Hernandez-Benitez1,3, Jun Wu1,4, Jie Zhu5,6, Euiseok J Kim7, Fumiyuki Hatanaka1, Mako Yamamoto1, Toshikazu Araoka1,4, Zhe Li8, Masakazu Kurita1, Tomoaki Hishida1, Mo Li1, Emi Aizawa1, Shicheng Guo8, Song Chen8, April Goebl1, Rupa Devi Soligalla1, Jing Qu9,10, Tingshuai Jiang6,11, Xin Fu5,6, Maryam Jafari6, Concepcion Rodriguez Esteban1, W Travis Berggren12, Jeronimo Lajara4, Estrella Nuñez-Delicado4, Pedro Guillen4,13, Josep M Campistol14, Fumio Matsuzaki2, Guang-Hui Liu10,15,16,17, Pierre Magistretti3, Kun Zhang8, Edward M Callaway7, Kang Zhang5,6,18,19, Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte1.   

Abstract

Targeted genome editing via engineered nucleases is an exciting area of biomedical research and holds potential for clinical applications. Despite rapid advances in the field, in vivo targeted transgene integration is still infeasible because current tools are inefficient, especially for non-dividing cells, which compose most adult tissues. This poses a barrier for uncovering fundamental biological principles and developing treatments for a broad range of genetic disorders. Based on clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat/Cas9 (CRISPR/Cas9) technology, here we devise a homology-independent targeted integration (HITI) strategy, which allows for robust DNA knock-in in both dividing and non-dividing cells in vitro and, more importantly, in vivo (for example, in neurons of postnatal mammals). As a proof of concept of its therapeutic potential, we demonstrate the efficacy of HITI in improving visual function using a rat model of the retinal degeneration condition retinitis pigmentosa. The HITI method presented here establishes new avenues for basic research and targeted gene therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27851729      PMCID: PMC5331785          DOI: 10.1038/nature20565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  45 in total

1.  Human retinal progenitor cell transplantation preserves vision.

Authors:  Jing Luo; Petr Baranov; Sherrina Patel; Hong Ouyang; John Quach; Frances Wu; Austin Qiu; Hongrong Luo; Caroline Hicks; Jing Zeng; Jing Zhu; Jessica Lu; Nicole Sfeir; Cindy Wen; Meixia Zhang; Victoria Reade; Sara Patel; John Sinden; Xiaodong Sun; Peter Shaw; Michael Young; Kang Zhang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Oblique radial glial divisions in the developing mouse neocortex induce self-renewing progenitors outside the germinal zone that resemble primate outer subventricular zone progenitors.

Authors:  Atsunori Shitamukai; Daijiro Konno; Fumio Matsuzaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Intravenous injections in neonatal mice.

Authors:  Sara E Gombash Lampe; Brian K Kaspar; Kevin D Foust
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Mutation of the receptor tyrosine kinase gene Mertk in the retinal dystrophic RCS rat.

Authors:  P M D'Cruz; D Yasumura; J Weir; M T Matthes; H Abderrahim; M M LaVail; D Vollrath
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  AAV-Mediated Gene Therapy for Research and Therapeutic Purposes.

Authors:  R Jude Samulski; Nicholas Muzyczka
Journal:  Annu Rev Virol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 10.431

6.  A mechanism for the suppression of homologous recombination in G1 cells.

Authors:  Alexandre Orthwein; Sylvie M Noordermeer; Marcus D Wilson; Sébastien Landry; Radoslav I Enchev; Alana Sherker; Meagan Munro; Jordan Pinder; Jayme Salsman; Graham Dellaire; Bing Xia; Matthias Peter; Daniel Durocher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Obligate ligation-gated recombination (ObLiGaRe): custom-designed nuclease-mediated targeted integration through nonhomologous end joining.

Authors:  Marcello Maresca; Victor Guosheng Lin; Ning Guo; Yi Yang
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 8.  Is non-homologous end-joining really an inherently error-prone process?

Authors:  Mireille Bétermier; Pascale Bertrand; Bernard S Lopez
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  A robust system for production of minicircle DNA vectors.

Authors:  Mark A Kay; Cheng-Yi He; Zhi-Ying Chen
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  Microhomology-mediated end-joining-dependent integration of donor DNA in cells and animals using TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9.

Authors:  Shota Nakade; Takuya Tsubota; Yuto Sakane; Satoshi Kume; Naoaki Sakamoto; Masanobu Obara; Takaaki Daimon; Hideki Sezutsu; Takashi Yamamoto; Tetsushi Sakuma; Ken-ichi T Suzuki
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  374 in total

1.  An effective vaginal gel to deliver CRISPR/Cas9 system encapsulated in poly (β-amino ester) nanoparticles for vaginal gene therapy.

Authors:  Gang Niu; Zhuang Jin; Chong Zhang; Dan He; Xueqin Gao; Chenming Zou; Wei Zhang; Jiahui Ding; Bhudev C Das; Konstantin Severinov; Inga Isabel Hitzeroth; Priya Ranjan Debata; Xin Ma; Xun Tian; Qinglei Gao; Jun Wu; Zeshan You; Rui Tian; Zifeng Cui; Weiwen Fan; Weiling Xie; Zhaoyue Huang; Chen Cao; Wei Xu; Hongxian Xie; Hongyan Xu; Xiongzhi Tang; Yan Wang; Zhiying Yu; Hui Han; Songwei Tan; Shuqin Chen; Zheng Hu
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 8.143

Review 2.  Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: Challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Ling Li; Shuo Hu; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Predictable and precise template-free CRISPR editing of pathogenic variants.

Authors:  Max W Shen; Mandana Arbab; Jonathan Y Hsu; Daniel Worstell; Sannie J Culbertson; Olga Krabbe; Christopher A Cassa; David R Liu; David K Gifford; Richard I Sherwood
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  RNA-guided DNA insertion with CRISPR-associated transposases.

Authors:  Jonathan Strecker; Alim Ladha; Zachary Gardner; Jonathan L Schmid-Burgk; Kira S Makarova; Eugene V Koonin; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Quantitative Rodent Brain Receptor Imaging.

Authors:  Kristina Herfert; Julia G Mannheim; Laura Kuebler; Sabina Marciano; Mario Amend; Christoph Parl; Hanna Napieczynska; Florian M Maier; Salvador Castaneda Vega; Bernd J Pichler
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  RNA-Guided Recombinase-Cas9 Fusion Targets Genomic DNA Deletion and Integration.

Authors:  Kylie Standage-Beier; Nicholas Brookhouser; Parithi Balachandran; Qi Zhang; David A Brafman; Xiao Wang
Journal:  CRISPR J       Date:  2019-08

Review 7.  Approach for in vivo delivery of CRISPR/Cas system: a recent update and future prospect.

Authors:  Yu-Fan Chuang; Andrew J Phipps; Fan-Li Lin; Valerie Hecht; Alex W Hewitt; Peng-Yuan Wang; Guei-Sheung Liu
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 8.  Advanced imaging and labelling methods to decipher brain cell organization and function.

Authors:  Daniel Choquet; Matthieu Sainlos; Jean-Baptiste Sibarita
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Decoding non-random mutational signatures at Cas9 targeted sites.

Authors:  Amir Taheri-Ghahfarokhi; Benjamin J M Taylor; Roberto Nitsch; Anders Lundin; Anna-Lina Cavallo; Katja Madeyski-Bengtson; Fredrik Karlsson; Maryam Clausen; Ryan Hicks; Lorenz M Mayr; Mohammad Bohlooly-Y; Marcello Maresca
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 10.  CRISPR-Based Therapeutic Genome Editing: Strategies and In Vivo Delivery by AAV Vectors.

Authors:  Dan Wang; Feng Zhang; Guangping Gao
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 41.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.