OBJECTIVES: To determine the influence of periapical lesions on the repeatability of two electronic apex locators (EALs), Root ZX II, and RomiApex A-15, in maxillary anterior teeth, in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After approval by the local ethics committee, 43 maxillary anterior teeth scheduled for root canal therapy were assigned to two groups. The periapical lesion (PAL) group included 21 teeth with necrotic pulps and radiographically visible periapical lesion, and the normal periapex (NPA) group consisted of 22 teeth with vital pulps and no periapical lesion. In each canal, Root ZX II and RomiApex A-15 were used to determine working length defined as the "zero" reading on the display. Two consecutive measurements were performed with each EAL on each tooth and a second operator measured the endodontic file with a digital caliper without knowledge of the EAL being used or the tooth diagnosis. The absolute value of the difference between the first and second measurement (measurement pairs) was calculated. Repeatability was evaluated by the Bland-Altman method, and an aligned ranks transformation ANOVA was conducted to compare the EALs. RESULTS: The median absolute difference between measurement pairs was significantly lower (p < 0.001) and the limits of agreement were narrower in the NPA group. Among the EALs, median absolute differences were significantly smaller for Root ZX (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Measurements were more repeatable when no periapical lesion was present. Root ZX showed better repeatability than RomiApex. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Periapical lesions seem to influence successive in vivo measurements with EALs.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the influence of periapical lesions on the repeatability of two electronic apex locators (EALs), Root ZX II, and RomiApex A-15, in maxillary anterior teeth, in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After approval by the local ethics committee, 43 maxillary anterior teeth scheduled for root canal therapy were assigned to two groups. The periapical lesion (PAL) group included 21 teeth with necrotic pulps and radiographically visible periapical lesion, and the normal periapex (NPA) group consisted of 22 teeth with vital pulps and no periapical lesion. In each canal, Root ZX II and RomiApex A-15 were used to determine working length defined as the "zero" reading on the display. Two consecutive measurements were performed with each EAL on each tooth and a second operator measured the endodontic file with a digital caliper without knowledge of the EAL being used or the tooth diagnosis. The absolute value of the difference between the first and second measurement (measurement pairs) was calculated. Repeatability was evaluated by the Bland-Altman method, and an aligned ranks transformation ANOVA was conducted to compare the EALs. RESULTS: The median absolute difference between measurement pairs was significantly lower (p < 0.001) and the limits of agreement were narrower in the NPA group. Among the EALs, median absolute differences were significantly smaller for Root ZX (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Measurements were more repeatable when no periapical lesion was present. Root ZX showed better repeatability than RomiApex. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Periapical lesions seem to influence successive in vivo measurements with EALs.
Authors: S Schell; M S Judenhofer; J G Mannheim; M Hülber-J; C Löst; B J Pichler; A ElAyouti Journal: Int Endod J Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 5.264