Literature DB >> 20739567

Neural predictors of within-subject fluctuations in attentional control.

Andrew B Leber1.   

Abstract

Whether salient objects automatically capture attention has long been the subject of considerable controversy. A possible resolution, investigated in this functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, is that observers vacillate between periods when attention capture is robust and when it is minimal. Human observers searched static displays for a target circle among nontarget squares; an irrelevant color singleton distractor appeared on 50% of trials. Behavioral results showed a distraction effect in which response times to distractor-present trials were slower than for distractor-absent trials. fMRI results confirmed that this distraction effect not only fluctuated within experimental sessions, but the momentary degree of distraction could be predicted in advance by pretrial activity in middle frontal gyrus. A second experiment ruled out an alternative account by which participants achieved resistance to capture by trading off search efficiency. Together, these data reveal that observers frequently exert the capacity to resist attentional distraction, although they do not to sustain this capacity for long periods of time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20739567      PMCID: PMC6633337          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0809-10.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  42 in total

1.  Transient reduction of visual distraction following electrical stimulation of the prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Joshua D Cosman; Priyanka V Atreya; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-08-28

Review 2.  Recent theoretical, neural, and clinical advances in sustained attention research.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Joseph DeGutis; Michael Esterman
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2017-03-05       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Inability to suppress salient distractors predicts low visual working memory capacity.

Authors:  John M Gaspar; Gregory J Christie; David J Prime; Pierre Jolicœur; John J McDonald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Attentional capture alters feature perception.

Authors:  Jiageng Chen; Andrew B Leber; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 5.  A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 6.  Measuring and interpreting neuronal correlations.

Authors:  Marlene R Cohen; Adam Kohn
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Intrinsic fluctuations in sustained attention and distractor processing.

Authors:  Michael Esterman; Monica D Rosenberg; Sarah K Noonan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Functional connectivity predicts changes in attention observed across minutes, days, and months.

Authors:  Monica D Rosenberg; Dustin Scheinost; Abigail S Greene; Emily W Avery; Young Hye Kwon; Emily S Finn; Ramachandran Ramani; Maolin Qiu; R Todd Constable; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Active suppression of distractors that match the contents of visual working memory.

Authors:  Risa Sawaki; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2011-08

10.  Neural correlates of learning to attend.

Authors:  Todd A Kelley; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.