Literature DB >> 34935121

Unconscious social relation threats: Invisible boss face biases attention.

Yanliang Sun1, Luzi Xu2, Xinyu Luo1, Yanju Ren3, Xiaowei Ding4.   

Abstract

Threatening stimuli as a kind of salient information often guide attentional orienting. Besides physically threatening stimuli, social threats can also strongly bias attention, even in the absence of conscious awareness. However, the available evidence mainly came from studies on an emotional face. It is unclear whether social relation threats, such as a boss face without emotional expressions, can also direct attentional orienting unconsciously. This study aimed to reveal the extent to which the attentional system has developed to process threatening stimuli by exploring whether invisible social relation threats unconsciously biased attention. We asked graduate and undergraduate students to perform a modified Posner's cue-target task, in which the probe was preceded by a pair of competitive face cues (an advisor's face and another faculty member's face), rendered invisible through continuous flash suppression. Experiment 1a's results showed that the advisor's face reflexively oriented graduate students' spatial attention, which was significantly correlated with subjective social threat evaluation. However, Experiment 1b showed that an invisible advisor's face did not induce the same effect in undergraduate students, as they reported significantly fewer threats from their advisors than graduates. To ensure the robustness of this new effect, we preregistered a replicate study and successfully replicated the above results in Experiments 2a and 2b. Our findings provide evidence for the existence of an attentional orienting bias toward invisible social relation threats. These results suggest that the attentional system evolved to promote the exploration of our visual environment for threatening social relation signals.
© 2021. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attentional orienting; Continuous flash suppression; Preregistered; Social relation; Social threat

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34935121     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02366-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  38 in total

1.  A selective review of selective attention research from the past century.

Authors:  Jon Driver
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2001-02

2.  Motion onset captures attention.

Authors:  Richard A Abrams; Shawn E Christ
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-09

3.  Familiarity and emotional expression influence an early stage of face processing: an electrophysiological study.

Authors:  Stéphanie Caharel; Nolwenn Courtay; Christian Bernard; Robert Lalonde; Mohamed Rebaï
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2005-07-12       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Processing of invisible stimuli: advantage of upright faces and recognizable words in overcoming interocular suppression.

Authors:  Yi Jiang; Patricia Costello; Sheng He
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-04

5.  Masked fearful faces modulate the orienting of covert spatial attention.

Authors:  Joshua M Carlson; Karen S Reinke
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2008-08

6.  Attention to self-referential stimuli: can I ignore my own face?

Authors:  Christel Devue; Serge Brédart
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2008-04-14

7.  Spatial attention-related modulation of the N170 by backward masked fearful faces.

Authors:  Joshua M Carlson; Karen S Reinke
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways.

Authors:  Fang Fang; Sheng He
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-09-04       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Frequent words do not break continuous flash suppression differently from infrequent or nonexistent words: implications for semantic processing of words in the absence of awareness.

Authors:  Tom Heyman; Pieter Moors
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Individual differences in children's facial expression recognition ability: The role of nature and nurture.

Authors:  Jennifer Y F Lau; Michael Burt; Ellen Leibenluft; Daniel S Pine; Fruhling Rijsdijk; Nina Shiffrin; Thalia C Eley
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.253

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.