Literature DB >> 20601711

New objects do not capture attention without a sensory transient.

Andrew Hollingworth1, Daniel J Simons, Steven L Franconeri.   

Abstract

Attention capture occurs when a stimulus event involuntarily recruits attention. The abrupt appearance of a new object is perhaps the most well-studied attention-capturing event, yet there is debate over the root cause of this capture. Does a new object capture attention because it involves the creation of a new object representation or because its appearance creates a characteristic luminance transient? The present study sought to resolve this question by introducing a new object into a search display, either with or without a unique luminance transient. Contrary to the results of a recent study (Davoli, Suszko, & Abrams, 2007), when the new object's transient was masked by a brief interstimulus interval introduced between the placeholder and search arrays, a new object did not capture attention. Moreover, when a new object's transient was masked, participants could not locate a new object efficiently even when that was their explicit goal. Together, these data suggest that luminance transient signals are necessary for attention capture by new objects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20601711      PMCID: PMC3163077          DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.5.1298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  39 in total

1.  The roles of vision and eye movements in the control of activities of daily living.

Authors:  M Land; N Mennie; J Rusted
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Asymmetries in visual search: an introduction.

Authors:  J M Wolfe
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-04

3.  New objects dominate luminance transients in setting attentional priority.

Authors:  J T Enns; E L Austen; V D Lollo; R Rauschenberger; S Yantis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Moving and looming stimuli capture attention.

Authors:  Steven L Franconeri; Daniel J Simons
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-10

5.  Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

6.  Visual salience in the change detection paradigm: the special role of object onset.

Authors:  Geoff G Cole; Robert W Kentridge; Charles A Heywood; Geoff G Cole
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search.

Authors:  S Yantis; J Jonides
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  A feature-integration theory of attention.

Authors:  A M Treisman; G Gelade
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The comparison of visual working memory representations with perceptual inputs.

Authors:  Joo-seok Hyun; Geoffrey F Woodman; Edward K Vogel; Andrew Hollingworth; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Constructing visual representations of natural scenes: the roles of short- and long-term visual memory.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  9 in total

1.  Hidden from view: Statistical learning exposes latent attentional capture.

Authors:  Matthew D Hilchey; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10

2.  Out with the new, in with the old: Exogenous orienting to locations with physically constant stimulation.

Authors:  J Eric T Taylor; Matthew D Hilchey; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

3.  The problem of latent attentional capture: Easy visual search conceals capture by task-irrelevant abrupt onsets.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Eric Ruthruff; Mei-Ching Lien
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Categorical cuing: Object categories structure the acquisition of statistical regularities to guide visual search.

Authors:  Brett Bahle; Ariel M Kershner; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2021-04-08

5.  Progress Toward Resolving the Attentional Capture Debate.

Authors:  Steven J Luck; Nicholas Gaspelin; Charles L Folk; Roger W Remington; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2020-12-01

6.  Finding flicker: critical differences in temporal frequency capture attention.

Authors:  John Cass; Erik Van der Burg; David Alais
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-11-15

7.  Nociceptive-Evoked Potentials Are Sensitive to Behaviorally Relevant Stimulus Displacements in Egocentric Coordinates.

Authors:  M Moayedi; G Di Stefano; M T Stubbs; B Djeugam; M Liang; G D Iannetti
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2016-07-11

8.  Is It Implicit Detection or Perception During Change Blindness?

Authors:  Wang Xiang
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2020-11-24

9.  Dual processes of oculomotor capture by abrupt onset: rapid involuntary capture and sluggish voluntary prioritization.

Authors:  Feng Du; Yue Qi; Xingshan Li; Kan Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.