Literature DB >> 33560252

A Prospective, Randomized Study Evaluating Clinical and Radiographic Efficacy of Lumbar Interbody Fusion Performed Using a Truss Technology-Based Interbody Fusion Device With Homologous Bone or Bone Marrow Aspirate.

Benjamin Chatterjee1, Michael Rauschmann2, Christoph Fleege1, Mohammad Arabmotlagh2, Sven Schmidt2, Kimberly Martin3, Marcus Rickert1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our group used vertebral bone marrow aspirate (BMA) with an anterior truss-based interbody implant to promote fusion. This implant has biomechanical characteristics that may enhance bone on-growth and through-growth and allow for the use of BMA clot alone. The primary end point was comparison of the proportion of patients who achieved fusion with the implant packed with either crushed cancellous homologous bone chips (CCB) alone or with BMA clot alone.
METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive either BMA clot or CCB in the implant. Both groups also had supplemental fixation. Clinical assessments were performed preoperatively and postoperatively at 3, 6, and 12 months, including for the Oswestry Disability Index, leg and back visual analog scale, EQ5-D, reoperations, complications, and adverse events. Radiographs were obtained prior to discharge and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. A computed tomography scan was performed 3 months postoperatively. Radiographs were assessed by an independent radiologist to determine fusion status and evidence of subsidence.
RESULTS: Between January 2015 and February 2016, 42 consecutive patients were randomized into 1 of the 2 study groups. There were significant postoperative changes within both groups in pain improvement across all outcome scales. There were no significant differences between groups in change scores from preoperative to assessments at any follow-up time point, with the exception of the change in EQ-5D and visual analog scale at 6 months; however, there was no difference at 3 or 12 months. There were no device-related adverse events in either group. All patients achieved grade II fusion at 3 months postoperatively. There was no significant difference in implant subsidence between groups or smokers versus nonsmokers.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical outcomes of this study suggest that reliable fusion can be obtained using an anterior truss-based implant with either CCB or BMA alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2. This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery.
Copyright © 2020 ISASS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALIF; anterior truss based interbody implant; bone marrow aspirate; crushed cancellous bone; fusion

Year:  2020        PMID: 33560252      PMCID: PMC7872402          DOI: 10.14444/7141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  24 in total

1.  Development of a computer-assisted forensic radiographic identification method using the lateral cervical and lumbar spine.

Authors:  Sharon M Derrick; Michelle H Raxter; John A Hipp; Priya Goel; Elaine F Chan; Jennifer C Love; Jason M Wiersema; N Shastry Akella
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 1.832

2.  Allograft versus autograft in cervical and lumbar spinal fusions: an examination of operative time, length of stay, surgical site infection, and blood transfusions.

Authors:  Meghan E Murphy; Brandon A Mccutcheon; Jennifer Grauberger; Daniel Shepherd; Patrick R Maloney; Lorenzo Rinaldo; Panagiotis Kerezoudis; Jeremy L Fogelson; Ahmad Nassr; Mohamad Bydon
Journal:  J Neurosurg Sci       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Strains in trussed spine interbody fusion implants are modulated by load and design.

Authors:  Jason P Caffrey; Eloy Alonso; Koichi Masuda; Jessee P Hunt; Cameron N Carmody; Timothy M Ganey; Robert L Sah
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2018-02-03

4.  Ex vivo loading of trussed implants for spine fusion induces heterogeneous strains consistent with homeostatic bone mechanobiology.

Authors:  Jason P Caffrey; Esther Cory; Van W Wong; Koichi Masuda; Albert C Chen; Jessee P Hunt; Timothy M Ganey; Robert L Sah
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Subsidence following anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF): a prospective study.

Authors:  Prashanth J Rao; Kevin Phan; Gloria Giang; Monish M Maharaj; Steven Phan; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06

6.  The rate of fusion for stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mustfa Manzur; Sohrab S Virk; Bridget Jivanelli; Avani S Vaishnav; Steven J McAnany; Todd J Albert; Sravisht Iyer; Catherine Himo Gang; Sheeraz Qureshi
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Combination Ti/PEEK ALIF cage for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: Early clinical and radiological results.

Authors:  Ralph Jasper Mobbs; Kevin Phan; Yusuf Assem; Matthew Pelletier; William R Walsh
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 1.961

Review 8.  Comparison of Allograft and Autograft in Lumbar Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Zhong Liao; Chao-Hui Wang; Wei-Liang Cui
Journal:  J Invest Surg       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 2.533

9.  Costs and frequency of "off-label" use of INFUSE for spinal fusions at one institution in 2010.

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein; Garry S Schwall
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2011-08-17

10.  Demineralized Bone Matrix (DBM) as a Bone Void Filler in Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Pilot Study of Simultaneous DBM and Autologous Bone Grafts.

Authors:  Bum-Joon Kim; Se-Hoon Kim; Haebin Lee; Seung-Hwan Lee; Won-Hyung Kim; Sung-Won Jin
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2017-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.