Literature DB >> 29433006

Strains in trussed spine interbody fusion implants are modulated by load and design.

Jason P Caffrey1, Eloy Alonso1, Koichi Masuda2, Jessee P Hunt3, Cameron N Carmody4, Timothy M Ganey5, Robert L Sah6.   

Abstract

Titanium cages with 3-D printed trussed open-space architectures may provide an opportunity to deliver targeted mechanical behavior in spine interbody fusion devices. The ability to control mechanical strain, at levels known to stimulate an osteogenic response, to the fusion site could lead to development of optimized therapeutic implants that improve clinical outcomes. In this study, cages of varying design (1.00 mm or 0.75 mm diameter struts) were mechanically characterized and compared for multiple compressive load magnitudes in order to determine what impact certain design variables had on localized strain. Each cage was instrumented with small fiducial sphere markers (88 total) at each strut vertex of the truss structure, which comprised of 260 individual struts. Cages were subjected to a 50 N control, 1000 N, or 2000 N compressive load between contoured loading platens in a simulated vertebral fusion condition, during which the cages were imaged using high-resolution micro-CT. The cage was analyzed as a mechanical truss structure, with each strut defined as the connection of two vertex fiducials. The deformation and strain of each strut was determined from 50 N control to 1000 N or 2000 N load by tracking the change in distance between each fiducial marker. As in a truss system, the number of struts in tension (positive strain) and compression (negative strain) were roughly equal, with increased loads resulting in a widened distribution (SD) compared with that at 50 N tare load indicating increased strain magnitudes. Strain distribution increased from 1000 N (+156 ± 415 με) to 2000 N (+180 ± 605 με) in 1.00 mm cages, which was similar to 0.75 mm cages (+132 ± 622 με) at 1000 N load. Strain amplitudes increased 42%, from 346με at 1000 N to 492με at 2000 N, for 1.00 mm cages. At 1000 N, strain amplitude in 0.75 mm cages (481με) was higher by 39% than that in 1.00 mm cages. These amplitudes corresponded to the mechanobiological range of bone homeostasis+formation, with 63 ± 2% (p < .05 vs other groups), 72 ± 3%, and 73 ± 1% of struts within that range for 1.00 mm at 1000 N, 1.00 mm at 2000 N, and 0.75 mm at 1000 N, respectively. The effective compressive modulus for both cage designs was also dependent on strut diameter, with modulus decreasing from 12.1 ± 2.3 GPa (1.25 mm) to 9.2 ± 7.5 GPa (1.00 mm) and 3.8 ± 0.6 GPa (0.75 mm). This study extended past micro-scale mechanical characterization of trussed cages to compare the effects of design on cage mechanical behavior at moderate (1000 N) and strenuous (2000 N) load levels. The findings suggest that future cage designs may be modulated to target desired mechanical strain regimes at physiological loads.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Experimental mechanics; Interbody fusion; Lumbar spine; Micro-computed tomography; Strain

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29433006     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  3 in total

1.  A Prospective, Randomized Study Evaluating Clinical and Radiographic Efficacy of Lumbar Interbody Fusion Performed Using a Truss Technology-Based Interbody Fusion Device With Homologous Bone or Bone Marrow Aspirate.

Authors:  Benjamin Chatterjee; Michael Rauschmann; Christoph Fleege; Mohammad Arabmotlagh; Sven Schmidt; Kimberly Martin; Marcus Rickert
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

Review 2.  Biomaterials for Interbody Fusion in Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Han Zhang; Zhonghan Wang; Yang Wang; Zuhao Li; Bo Chao; Shixian Liu; Wangwang Luo; Jianhang Jiao; Minfei Wu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-17

3.  Patient-Specific Variations in Local Strain Patterns on the Surface of a Trussed Titanium Interbody Cage.

Authors:  Arjan C Y Loenen; Jérôme Noailly; Keita Ito; Paul C Willems; Jacobus J Arts; Bert van Rietbergen
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-01-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.