Literature DB >> 33552534

Strongly deleterious mutations are a primary determinant of extinction risk due to inbreeding depression.

Christopher C Kyriazis1, Robert K Wayne1, Kirk E Lohmueller1,2,3.   

Abstract

Human-driven habitat fragmentation and loss have led to a proliferation of small and isolated plant and animal populations with high risk of extinction. One of the main threats to extinction in these populations is inbreeding depression, which is primarily caused by recessive deleterious mutations becoming homozygous due to inbreeding. The typical approach for managing these populations is to maintain high genetic diversity, increasingly by translocating individuals from large populations to initiate a "genetic rescue." However, the limitations of this approach have recently been highlighted by the demise of the gray wolf population on Isle Royale, which declined to the brink of extinction soon after the arrival of a migrant from the large mainland wolf population. Here, we use a novel population genetic simulation framework to investigate the role of genetic diversity, deleterious variation, and demographic history in mediating extinction risk due to inbreeding depression in small populations. We show that, under realistic models of dominance, large populations harbor high levels of recessive strongly deleterious variation due to these mutations being hidden from selection in the heterozygous state. As a result, when large populations contract, they experience a substantially elevated risk of extinction after these strongly deleterious mutations are exposed by inbreeding. Moreover, we demonstrate that, although genetic rescue is broadly effective as a means to reduce extinction risk, its effectiveness can be greatly increased by drawing migrants from small or moderate-sized source populations rather than large source populations due to smaller populations harboring lower levels of recessive strongly deleterious variation. Our findings challenge the traditional conservation paradigm that focuses on maximizing genetic diversity in small populations in favor of a view that emphasizes minimizing strongly deleterious variation. These insights have important implications for managing small and isolated populations in the increasingly fragmented landscape of the Anthropocene.
© 2020 The Authors. Evolution Letters published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE) and European Society for Evolutionary Biology (ESEB).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extinction; gene flow; inbreeding; purifying selection

Year:  2020        PMID: 33552534      PMCID: PMC7857301          DOI: 10.1002/evl3.209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Lett        ISSN: 2056-3744


  40 in total

1.  Reevaluating and broadening the definition of genetic rescue.

Authors:  Philip W Hedrick; Jennifer R Adams; John A Vucetich
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 6.560

Review 2.  The genetics of inbreeding depression.

Authors:  Deborah Charlesworth; John H Willis
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Wolves, moose, and tree rings on isle royale.

Authors:  B E McLaren; R O Peterson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-12-02       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Settling the score: variant prioritization and Mendelian disease.

Authors:  Karen Eilbeck; Aaron Quinlan; Mark Yandell
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Source population characteristics affect heterosis following genetic rescue of fragmented plant populations.

Authors:  M Pickup; D L Field; D M Rowell; A G Young
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Understanding Inbreeding Depression, Purging, and Genetic Rescue.

Authors:  Philip W Hedrick; Aurora Garcia-Dorado
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Distance from sub-Saharan Africa predicts mutational load in diverse human genomes.

Authors:  Brenna M Henn; Laura R Botigué; Stephan Peischl; Isabelle Dupanloup; Mikhail Lipatov; Brian K Maples; Alicia R Martin; Shaila Musharoff; Howard Cann; Michael P Snyder; Laurent Excoffier; Jeffrey M Kidd; Carlos D Bustamante
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Genomic Flatlining in the Endangered Island Fox.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Robinson; Diego Ortega-Del Vecchyo; Zhenxin Fan; Bernard Y Kim; Bridgett M vonHoldt; Clare D Marsden; Kirk E Lohmueller; Robert K Wayne
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Inference of the Distribution of Selection Coefficients for New Nonsynonymous Mutations Using Large Samples.

Authors:  Bernard Y Kim; Christian D Huber; Kirk E Lohmueller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Ancestry-Dependent Enrichment of Deleterious Homozygotes in Runs of Homozygosity.

Authors:  Zachary A Szpiech; Angel C Y Mak; Marquitta J White; Donglei Hu; Celeste Eng; Esteban G Burchard; Ryan D Hernandez
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  25 in total

1.  Multi-population puma connectivity could restore genomic diversity to at-risk coastal populations in California.

Authors:  Kyle D Gustafson; Roderick B Gagne; Michael R Buchalski; T Winston Vickers; Seth P D Riley; Jeff A Sikich; Jaime L Rudd; Justin A Dellinger; Melanie E F LaCava; Holly B Ernest
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 5.183

2.  The crucial role of genome-wide genetic variation in conservation.

Authors:  Marty Kardos; Ellie E Armstrong; Sarah W Fitzpatrick; Samantha Hauser; Philip W Hedrick; Joshua M Miller; David A Tallmon; W Chris Funk
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Genomic consequences of a century of inbreeding and isolation in the Danish wild boar population.

Authors:  Beril Yıldız; Hendrik-Jan Megens; Christina Hvilsom; Mirte Bosse
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 4.  Genetic load: genomic estimates and applications in non-model animals.

Authors:  Giorgio Bertorelle; Francesca Raffini; Hernán E Morales; Cock van Oosterhout; Mirte Bosse; Chiara Bortoluzzi; Alessio Iannucci; Emiliano Trucchi
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 59.581

5.  Genomic erosion in a demographically recovered bird species during conservation rescue.

Authors:  Hazel A Jackson; Lawrence Percival-Alwyn; Camilla Ryan; Mohammed F Albeshr; Luca Venturi; Hernán E Morales; Thomas C Mathers; Jonathan Cocker; Samuel A Speak; Gonzalo G Accinelli; Tom Barker; Darren Heavens; Faye Willman; Deborah Dawson; Lauren Ward; Vikash Tatayah; Nicholas Zuël; Richard Young; Lianne Concannon; Harriet Whitford; Bernardo Clavijo; Nancy Bunbury; Kevin M Tyler; Kevin Ruhomaun; Molly K Grace; Michael W Bruford; Carl G Jones; Simon Tollington; Diana J Bell; Jim J Groombridge; Matt Clark; Cock Van Oosterhout
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 7.563

6.  Low Persistence of Genetic Rescue Across Generations in the Arctic Fox (Vulpes lagopus).

Authors:  Anna Lotsander; Malin Hasselgren; Malin Larm; Johan Wallén; Anders Angerbjörn; Karin Norén
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.645

7.  Genetic architecture and lifetime dynamics of inbreeding depression in a wild mammal.

Authors:  M A Stoffel; S E Johnston; J G Pilkington; J M Pemberton
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Genomic insights into the conservation status of the world's last remaining Sumatran rhinoceros populations.

Authors:  Johanna von Seth; Nicolas Dussex; David Díez-Del-Molino; Tom van der Valk; Verena E Kutschera; Marcin Kierczak; Cynthia C Steiner; Shanlin Liu; M Thomas P Gilbert; Mikkel-Holger S Sinding; Stefan Prost; Katerina Guschanski; Senthilvel K S S Nathan; Selina Brace; Yvonne L Chan; Christopher W Wheat; Pontus Skoglund; Oliver A Ryder; Benoit Goossens; Anders Götherström; Love Dalén
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Conservation genetics as a management tool: The five best-supported paradigms to assist the management of threatened species.

Authors:  Yvonne Willi; Torsten N Kristensen; Carla M Sgrò; Andrew R Weeks; Michael Ørsted; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 12.779

10.  The genome of the Pyrenean desman and the effects of bottlenecks and inbreeding on the genomic landscape of an endangered species.

Authors:  Lídia Escoda; Jose Castresana
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 5.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.