Literature DB >> 35554972

Genomic erosion in a demographically recovered bird species during conservation rescue.

Hazel A Jackson1, Lawrence Percival-Alwyn2, Camilla Ryan3,4, Mohammed F Albeshr5,6, Luca Venturi7, Hernán E Morales8, Thomas C Mathers9, Jonathan Cocker4,5, Samuel A Speak3, Gonzalo G Accinelli4, Tom Barker4, Darren Heavens4, Faye Willman1,10, Deborah Dawson11, Lauren Ward1,11, Vikash Tatayah12, Nicholas Zuël12, Richard Young13, Lianne Concannon13, Harriet Whitford13, Bernardo Clavijo4, Nancy Bunbury14,15, Kevin M Tyler16, Kevin Ruhomaun17, Molly K Grace18, Michael W Bruford19, Carl G Jones12,13, Simon Tollington1,11,20, Diana J Bell5, Jim J Groombridge1, Matt Clark4,7, Cock Van Oosterhout3.   

Abstract

The pink pigeon (Nesoenas mayeri) is an endemic species of Mauritius that has made a remarkable recovery after a severe population bottleneck in the 1970s to early 1990s. Prior to this bottleneck, an ex situ population was established from which captive-bred individuals were released into free-living subpopulations to increase population size and genetic variation. This conservation rescue led to rapid population recovery to 400-480 individuals, and the species was twice downlisted on the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List. We analyzed the impacts of the bottleneck and genetic rescue on neutral genetic variation during and after population recovery (1993-2008) with restriction site-associated sequencing, microsatellite analyses, and quantitative genetic analysis of studbook data of 1112 birds from zoos in Europe and the United States. We used computer simulations to study the predicted changes in genetic variation and population viability from the past into the future. Genetic variation declined rapidly, despite the population rebound, and the effective population size was approximately an order of magnitude smaller than census size. The species carried a high genetic load of circa 15 lethal equivalents for longevity. Our computer simulations predicted continued inbreeding will likely result in increased expression of deleterious mutations (i.e., a high realized load) and severe inbreeding depression. Without continued conservation actions, it is likely that the pink pigeon will go extinct in the wild within 100 years. Conservation rescue of the pink pigeon has been instrumental in the recovery of the free-living population. However, further genetic rescue with captive-bred birds from zoos is required to recover lost variation, reduce expression of harmful deleterious variation, and prevent extinction. The use of genomics and modeling data can inform IUCN assessments of the viability and extinction risk of species, and it helps in assessments of the conservation dependency of populations.
© 2022 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nesoenas mayeri; captive breeding; diversidad genética; genetic diversity; genetic management; genetic rescue; manejo genético; reproducción en cautiverio; rescate genético

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35554972      PMCID: PMC9546124          DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   7.563


  46 in total

1.  The program structure does not reliably recover the correct population structure when sampling is uneven: subsampling and new estimators alleviate the problem.

Authors:  Sebastien J Puechmaille
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 7.090

2.  Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies.

Authors:  Daniel H Huson; David Bryant
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study.

Authors:  G Evanno; S Regnaut; J Goudet
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  A protocol for better design, application, and communication of population viability analyses.

Authors:  Guy Pe'er; Yiannis G Matsinos; Karin Johst; Kamila W Franz; Camille Turlure; Viktoriia Radchuk; Agnieszka H Malinowska; Janelle M R Curtis; Ilona Naujokaitis-Lewis; Brendan A Wintle; Klaus Henle
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 6.560

5.  Conserving adaptive potential: lessons from Tasmanian devils and their transmissible cancer.

Authors:  Paul A Hohenlohe; Hamish I McCallum; Menna E Jones; Matthew F Lawrance; Rodrigo K Hamede; Andrew Storfer
Journal:  Conserv Genet       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 2.538

Review 6.  Understanding Inbreeding Depression, Purging, and Genetic Rescue.

Authors:  Philip W Hedrick; Aurora Garcia-Dorado
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 7.  Genetic load: genomic estimates and applications in non-model animals.

Authors:  Giorgio Bertorelle; Francesca Raffini; Hernán E Morales; Cock van Oosterhout; Mirte Bosse; Chiara Bortoluzzi; Alessio Iannucci; Emiliano Trucchi
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 59.581

8.  Low Persistence of Genetic Rescue Across Generations in the Arctic Fox (Vulpes lagopus).

Authors:  Anna Lotsander; Malin Hasselgren; Malin Larm; Johan Wallén; Anders Angerbjörn; Karin Norén
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.645

9.  SLiM 3: Forward Genetic Simulations Beyond the Wright-Fisher Model.

Authors:  Benjamin C Haller; Philipp W Messer
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  NextClip: an analysis and read preparation tool for Nextera Long Mate Pair libraries.

Authors:  Richard M Leggett; Bernardo J Clavijo; Leah Clissold; Matthew D Clark; Mario Caccamo
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  1 in total

1.  Genomic erosion in a demographically recovered bird species during conservation rescue.

Authors:  Hazel A Jackson; Lawrence Percival-Alwyn; Camilla Ryan; Mohammed F Albeshr; Luca Venturi; Hernán E Morales; Thomas C Mathers; Jonathan Cocker; Samuel A Speak; Gonzalo G Accinelli; Tom Barker; Darren Heavens; Faye Willman; Deborah Dawson; Lauren Ward; Vikash Tatayah; Nicholas Zuël; Richard Young; Lianne Concannon; Harriet Whitford; Bernardo Clavijo; Nancy Bunbury; Kevin M Tyler; Kevin Ruhomaun; Molly K Grace; Michael W Bruford; Carl G Jones; Simon Tollington; Diana J Bell; Jim J Groombridge; Matt Clark; Cock Van Oosterhout
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 7.563

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.