Literature DB >> 34772759

The crucial role of genome-wide genetic variation in conservation.

Marty Kardos1, Ellie E Armstrong2, Sarah W Fitzpatrick3,4,5, Samantha Hauser6, Philip W Hedrick7, Joshua M Miller8,9,10, David A Tallmon11, W Chris Funk12.   

Abstract

The unprecedented rate of extinction calls for efficient use of genetics to help conserve biodiversity. Several recent genomic and simulation-based studies have argued that the field of conservation biology has placed too much focus on conserving genome-wide genetic variation, and that the field should instead focus on managing the subset of functional genetic variation that is thought to affect fitness. Here, we critically evaluate the feasibility and likely benefits of this approach in conservation. We find that population genetics theory and empirical results show that conserving genome-wide genetic variation is generally the best approach to prevent inbreeding depression and loss of adaptive potential from driving populations toward extinction. Focusing conservation efforts on presumably functional genetic variation will only be feasible occasionally, often misleading, and counterproductive when prioritized over genome-wide genetic variation. Given the increasing rate of habitat loss and other environmental changes, failure to recognize the detrimental effects of lost genome-wide genetic variation on long-term population viability will only worsen the biodiversity crisis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  extinction; genomics; population dynamics

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34772759      PMCID: PMC8640931          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2104642118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  93 in total

1.  How closely correlated are molecular and quantitative measures of genetic variation? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  D H Reed; R Frankham
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 2.  Molecular spandrels: tests of adaptation at the genetic level.

Authors:  Rowan D H Barrett; Hopi E Hoekstra
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 3.  Reconciling the analysis of IBD and IBS in complex trait studies.

Authors:  Joseph E Powell; Peter M Visscher; Michael E Goddard
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Effects of genetic drift on variance components under a general model of epistasis.

Authors:  N H Barton; Michael Turelli
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 5.  Genetic rescue to the rescue.

Authors:  Andrew R Whiteley; Sarah W Fitzpatrick; W Chris Funk; David A Tallmon
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  The ecological causes and consequences of hard and soft selection.

Authors:  Donovan A Bell; Ryan P Kovach; Zachary L Robinson; Andrew R Whiteley; Thomas E Reed
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  A complex phenotype in salmon controlled by a simple change in migratory timing.

Authors:  Neil F Thompson; Eric C Anderson; John Carlos Garza; Anthony J Clemento; Matthew A Campbell; Devon E Pearse; James W Hearsey; Andrew P Kinziger
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  High genomic deleterious mutation rates in hominids.

Authors:  A Eyre-Walker; P D Keightley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-01-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations.

Authors:  Adam Eyre-Walker; Peter D Keightley
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 53.242

10.  A comparative genomics multitool for scientific discovery and conservation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  14 in total

1.  Is the genomics 'cart' before the restoration ecology 'horse'? Insights from qualitative interviews and trends from the literature.

Authors:  Jakki J Mohr; Peter A Harrison; Jessica Stanhope; Martin F Breed
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 6.671

2.  Dynamics of reduced genetic diversity in increasingly fragmented populations of Florida scrub jays,Aphelocoma coerulescens.

Authors:  Tram N Nguyen; Nancy Chen; Elissa J Cosgrove; Reed Bowman; John W Fitzpatrick; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.929

3.  The genetic consequences of captive breeding, environmental change and human exploitation in the endangered peninsular pronghorn.

Authors:  Anastasia Klimova; Jesus Neftalí Gutiérrez-Rivera; Victor Sánchez-Sotomayor; Joseph Ivan Hoffman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 4.  Genetic load: genomic estimates and applications in non-model animals.

Authors:  Giorgio Bertorelle; Francesca Raffini; Hernán E Morales; Cock van Oosterhout; Mirte Bosse; Chiara Bortoluzzi; Alessio Iannucci; Emiliano Trucchi
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 59.581

5.  Genomic erosion in a demographically recovered bird species during conservation rescue.

Authors:  Hazel A Jackson; Lawrence Percival-Alwyn; Camilla Ryan; Mohammed F Albeshr; Luca Venturi; Hernán E Morales; Thomas C Mathers; Jonathan Cocker; Samuel A Speak; Gonzalo G Accinelli; Tom Barker; Darren Heavens; Faye Willman; Deborah Dawson; Lauren Ward; Vikash Tatayah; Nicholas Zuël; Richard Young; Lianne Concannon; Harriet Whitford; Bernardo Clavijo; Nancy Bunbury; Kevin M Tyler; Kevin Ruhomaun; Molly K Grace; Michael W Bruford; Carl G Jones; Simon Tollington; Diana J Bell; Jim J Groombridge; Matt Clark; Cock Van Oosterhout
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 7.563

6.  Weaving place-based knowledge for culturally significant species in the age of genomics: Looking to the past to navigate the future.

Authors:  Aisling Rayne; Stephanie Blair; Matthew Dale; Brendan Flack; John Hollows; Roger Moraga; Riki N Parata; Makarini Rupene; Paulette Tamati-Elliffe; Priscilla M Wehi; Matthew J Wylie; Tammy E Steeves
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 4.929

7.  Expanding the conservation genomics toolbox: Incorporating structural variants to enhance genomic studies for species of conservation concern.

Authors:  Jana Wold; Klaus-Peter Koepfli; Stephanie J Galla; David Eccles; Carolyn J Hogg; Marissa F Le Lec; Joseph Guhlin; Anna W Santure; Tammy E Steeves
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2021-09-12       Impact factor: 6.622

8.  Ancient Demographics Determine the Effectiveness of Genetic Purging in Endangered Lizards.

Authors:  Hong-Xin Xie; Xi-Xi Liang; Zhi-Qiang Chen; Wei-Ming Li; Chun-Rong Mi; Ming Li; Zheng-Jun Wu; Xu-Ming Zhou; Wei-Guo Du
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  The relevance of genetic structure in ecotype designation and conservation management.

Authors:  Astrid V Stronen; Anita J Norman; Eric Vander Wal; Paul C Paquet
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 5.183

Review 10.  A review of chemical defense in harlequin toads (Bufonidae: Atelopus).

Authors:  Kannon C Pearson; Rebecca D Tarvin
Journal:  Toxicon X       Date:  2022-01-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.