Literature DB >> 33551848

Contrast Tempo of Movement and Its Effect on Power Output and Bar Velocity During Resistance Exercise.

Michal Wilk1, Jakub Jarosz1, Michal Krzysztofik1, Aleksandra Filip-Stachnik1, Marcin Bialas2, Agata Rzeszutko-Belzowska3, Adam Zajac1, Petr Stastny4.   

Abstract

In this study, we examined the impact of contrast movement tempo (fast vs. slow) on power output and bar velocity during the bench press exercise. Ten healthy men (age = 26.9 ± 4.1 years; body mass = 90.5 ± 10.3 kg; bench press 1RM = 136.8 ± 27.7 kg) with significant experience in resistance training (9.4 ± 5.6 years) performed the bench press exercise under three conditions: with an explosive tempo of movement in each of three repetitions (E/E/E = explosive, explosive, explosive); with a slow tempo of movement in the first repetition and an explosive tempo in the next two repetitions (S/E/E = slow, explosive, explosive); and with a slow tempo of movement in the first two repetitions and an explosive tempo in the last repetition (S/S/E = slow, slow, explosive). The slow repetitions were performed with a 5/0/5/0 (eccentric/isometric/concentric/isometric) movement tempo, while the explosive repetitions were performed with an X/0/X/0 (X- maximal speed of movement) movement tempo. During each experimental session, the participants performed one set of three repetitions at 60%1RM. The two-way repeated measures ANOVA showed a statistically significant interaction effect for peak power output (PP; p = 0.03; η 2 = 0.26) and for peak bar velocity (PV; p = 0.04; η 2 = 0.24). Futhermore there was a statistically significant main effect of condition for PP (p = 0.04; η 2 = 0.30) and PV (p = 0.02; η 2 = 0.35). The post hoc analysis for interaction revealed that PP was significantly higher in the 2nd and 3rd repetition for E/E/E compared with the S/S/E (p < 0.01 for both) and significantly higher in the 2nd repetition for the S/E/E compared with S/S/E (p < 0.01). The post hoc analysis for interaction revealed that PV was significantly higher in the 2nd and 3rd repetition for E/E/E compared with the S/S/E (p < 0.01 for both), and significantly higher in the 2nd repetition for the S/E/E compared with the S/S/E (p < 0.01). The post hoc analysis for main effect of condition revealed that PP and PV was significantly higher for the E/E/E compared to the S/S/E (p = 0.04; p = 0.02; respectively). The main finding of this study was that different distribution of movement tempo during a set has a significant impact on power output and bar velocity in the bench press exercise at 60%1RM. However, the use of one slow repetition at the beginning of a set does not decrease the level of power output in the third repetition of that set.
Copyright © 2021 Wilk, Jarosz, Krzysztofik, Filip-Stachnik, Bialas, Rzeszutko-Belzowska, Zajac and Stastny.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cadence; duration of repetition; resistance exercise; time under tension; velocity of movement

Year:  2021        PMID: 33551848      PMCID: PMC7854892          DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.629199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Physiol        ISSN: 1664-042X            Impact factor:   4.566


  50 in total

1.  The impact of velocity of movement on performance factors in resistance exercise.

Authors:  Disa L Hatfield; William J Kraemer; Barry A Spiering; Keijo Häkkinen; Jeff S Volek; Tomoko Shimano; Luuk P B Spreuwenberg; Ricardo Silvestre; Jakob L Vingren; Maren S Fragala; Ana L Gómez; Steven J Fleck; Robert U Newton; Carl M Maresh
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Effect of movement velocity on the relationship between training load and the number of repetitions of bench press.

Authors:  Akihiro Sakamoto; Peter J Sinclair
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Blood ammonium and lactate accumulation response to different training protocols using the parallel squat exercise.

Authors:  Matthew J Rogatzki; Glenn A Wright; Richard P Mikat; A Glenn Brice
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Effects of lifting tempo on one repetition maximum and hormonal responses to a bench press protocol.

Authors:  Samuel A Headley; Kelley Henry; Bradley C Nindl; Brian A Thompson; William J Kraemer; Margaret T Jones
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 5.  Developing maximal neuromuscular power: part 2 - training considerations for improving maximal power production.

Authors:  Prue Cormie; Michael R McGuigan; Robert U Newton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Reliability and validity assessment of a linear position transducer.

Authors:  Manuel V Garnacho-Castaño; Silvia López-Lastra; José L Maté-Muñoz
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  The Influence of Movement Tempo on Acute Neuromuscular, Hormonal, and Mechanical Responses to Resistance Exercise-A Mini Review.

Authors:  Michal Wilk; James J Tufano; Adam Zajac
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Load-Power Relationship During a Countermovement Jump: A Joint Level Analysis.

Authors:  Kym J Williams; Dale W Chapman; Elissa J Phillips; Nick B Ball
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Inducing hypertrophic effects of type I skeletal muscle fibers: A hypothetical role of time under load in resistance training aimed at muscular hypertrophy.

Authors:  Jozo Grgic; Jan Homolak; Pavle Mikulic; Javier Botella; Brad J Schoenfeld
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 1.538

Review 10.  Implementing Eccentric Resistance Training-Part 2: Practical Recommendations.

Authors:  Timothy J Suchomel; John P Wagle; Jamie Douglas; Christopher B Taber; Mellissa Harden; G Gregory Haff; Michael H Stone
Journal:  J Funct Morphol Kinesiol       Date:  2019-08-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.