Literature DB >> 23838978

Blood ammonium and lactate accumulation response to different training protocols using the parallel squat exercise.

Matthew J Rogatzki1, Glenn A Wright, Richard P Mikat, A Glenn Brice.   

Abstract

Three parallel squat protocols with equal total work volume were used to determine the metabolic response of resistance exercise with different practical training protocols combining program variables in the way that they are typically prescribed in field. Sixteen men able to back squat 1.5 times their body weight participated in the study. Individualized muscular endurance (ME), strength (STR), and hypertrophy (HYP) squat workouts were developed based on a 1 repetition maximum back squat. Each protocol was performed 3-7 days apart in random order. Venous blood was obtained after 5 minutes of seated rest both before and after each workout for ammonium and lactate analysis. The ME protocol (79.8 μM [SD = 45.4], 95% confidence interval [CI]: 55.7-104.0) produced a greater change of plasma ammonium than both the HYP (45.3 μM [SD = 34.5], 95% CI: 26.9-63.6, p = 0.017) and STR (31.7 μM [SD = 52.3], 95% CI: 3.9-59.6, p = 0.006) protocols. Change of blood lactate concentration from resting levels to postexercise levels was significantly different (p = 0.005) between ME (6.1 mM [SD = 2.9], 95% CI: 4.6-7.7) and STR (3.9 mM [SD = 2.5], 95% CI: 2.6-5.2) protocols. The main finding of this study is that blood ammonium and lactate seem to accumulate in response to an increasing number of repetitions with decreasing rest time between sets. As consequence, a greater number of repetitions should be added to a resistance workout, along with a shorter rest time between sets when training for events that induce a large metabolic load. The metabolic accumulation associated with high repetition exercise may represent the need for longer recovery time between these types of workouts compared with workouts using a low number of repetitions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23838978     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182a1f84e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  6 in total

1.  The Effect of Rest Interval Length on Upper and Lower Body Exercises in Resistance-Trained Females.

Authors:  Desmond J Millender; Zachary A Mang; Jason R Beam; Rogelio A Realzola; Len Kravitz
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2021-10-01

2.  The effect of repetition tempo on cardiovascular and metabolic stress when time under tension is matched during lower body exercise.

Authors:  Zachary A Mang; Rogelio A Realzola; Jeremy Ducharme; Gabriella F Bellissimo; Jason R Beam; Christine Mermier; Flavio de Castro Magalhaes; Len Kravitz; Fabiano T Amorim
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Understanding the effects of beetroot juice intake on CrossFit performance by assessing hormonal, metabolic and mechanical response: a randomized, double-blind, crossover design.

Authors:  Manuel Vicente Garnacho-Castaño; Guillem Palau-Salvà; Noemí Serra-Payá; Mario Ruiz-Hermosel; Marina Berbell; Xavier Viñals; Manuel Gomis Bataller; Teresa Carbonell; Sergio Vilches-Saez; Eulogio Pleguezuelos Cobo; Lorena Molina-Raya
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 5.150

4.  Contrast Tempo of Movement and Its Effect on Power Output and Bar Velocity During Resistance Exercise.

Authors:  Michal Wilk; Jakub Jarosz; Michal Krzysztofik; Aleksandra Filip-Stachnik; Marcin Bialas; Agata Rzeszutko-Belzowska; Adam Zajac; Petr Stastny
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Strength-Endurance Training Reduces the Hamstrings Strength Decline Following Simulated Football Competition in Female Players.

Authors:  Anne Delextrat; Jessica Piquet; Martyn J Matthews; Daniel D Cohen
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 6.  The Influence of Movement Tempo During Resistance Training on Muscular Strength and Hypertrophy Responses: A Review.

Authors:  Michal Wilk; Adam Zajac; James J Tufano
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 11.928

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.