Literature DB >> 17194227

The impact of velocity of movement on performance factors in resistance exercise.

Disa L Hatfield1, William J Kraemer, Barry A Spiering, Keijo Häkkinen, Jeff S Volek, Tomoko Shimano, Luuk P B Spreuwenberg, Ricardo Silvestre, Jakob L Vingren, Maren S Fragala, Ana L Gómez, Steven J Fleck, Robert U Newton, Carl M Maresh.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of a very slow (VS) velocity and a self-selected volitional (VOL) velocity at varying intensities on repetition number, peak force, peak power, and total volume in the squat and shoulder press exercises. On separate testing days, 9 resistance trained men (age: 23.9 +/- 2.5 years; height: 174.8 +/- 6.5 cm; body mass: 80.1 +/- 12.4 kg) performed a squat (SQ) and shoulder press (SP) exercise at 60 or 80% of 1 repetition maximum (1RM) at either VOL or VS (10-second eccentric and 10-second concentric actions) velocity for as many repetitions as possible. Force, power, and volume (repetitions x kg) were also determined. Subjects performed significantly fewer repetitions (p < or = 0.05) in the VS exercises (60% VS SQ 5 +/- 1 vs. VOL SQ 24 +/- 2; 80% VS SQ 2 +/- 0 vs. VOL SQ 12 +/- 1; 60% VS SP 4 +/- 1 vs. VOL SP 14 +/- 2; 80% VS SP 1 +/- 0 vs. VOL SP 6 +/- 1). Peak force and power were significantly higher at the VOL speed (peak force [in newtons]: 60% VS SQ 564.4 +/- 77.3 vs. VOL SQ 1229.0 +/- 134.9 N; 80% VS SQ 457.3 +/- 27.9 vs. VOL SQ 1059.3 +/- 104.7 N; 60% VS SP 321.6 +/- 37.8 vs. VOL SP 940.7 +/- 144.8 N; 80% VS SP 296.5 +/- 24.7 vs. VOL SP 702.5 +/- 57.7 N; and peak power [in watts]: 60% VS SQ 271.2 +/- 40.1 vs. VOL SQ 783.2 +/- 129.1 W; 80% VS SQ 229.3 +/- 49.5 vs. VOL SQ 520.2 +/- 85.8 W; 60% VS SP 91.3 +/- 21.9 vs. VOL SP 706.6 +/- 151.4 W; 80% VS SP 78.1 +/- 19.8 vs. VOL SP 277.6 +/- 46.4 W). VOL speed elicited higher total volume than the VS velocity. The results of this study indicate that a VS velocity may not elicit appropriate levels of force, power, or volume to optimize strength and athletic performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17194227     DOI: 10.1519/R-155552.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  15 in total

1.  Blood pressure responses to resistive exercise in trained female athletes: Influence of velocity of movement.

Authors:  Hamid Arazi; Abbas Asadi; Vahide Alipour
Journal:  Interv Med Appl Sci       Date:  2014-12-22

2.  The Effects of Eccentric Cadence on Power and Velocity of the Bar during the Concentric Phase of the Bench Press Movement.

Authors:  Michal Wilk; Artur Golas; Michał Krzysztofik; Monika Nawrocka; Adam Zajac
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Early-phase muscular adaptations in response to slow-speed versus traditional resistance-training regimens.

Authors:  Mark D Schuenke; Jennifer R Herman; Roger M Gliders; Fredrick C Hagerman; Robert S Hikida; Sharon R Rana; Kerry E Ragg; Robert S Staron
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Impact of Duration of Eccentric Movement in the One-Repetition Maximum Test Result in the Bench Press among Women.

Authors:  Michal Wilk; Mariola Gepfert; Michal Krzysztofik; Aleksandra Mostowik; Aleksandra Filip; Grzegorz Hajduk; Adam Zajac
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Validity of a Commercial Linear Encoder to Estimate Bench Press 1 RM from the Force-Velocity Relationship.

Authors:  Laurent Bosquet; Jeremy Porta-Benache; Jérôme Blais
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  Neuromuscular and metabolic responses to three different resistance exercise methods.

Authors:  Hamid Arazi; Bahman Mirzaei; Naser Heidari
Journal:  Asian J Sports Med       Date:  2013-10-29

7.  Strength Training with Repetitions to Failure does not Provide Additional Strength and Muscle Hypertrophy Gains in Young Women.

Authors:  Saulo Martorelli; Eduardo Lusa Cadore; Mikel Izquierdo; Rodrigo Celes; André Martorelli; Vitor Alonso Cleto; José Gustavo Alvarenga; Martim Bottaro
Journal:  Eur J Transl Myol       Date:  2017-06-27

8.  Does Tempo of Resistance Exercise Impact Training Volume?

Authors:  Michal Wilk; Artur Golas; Petr Stastny; Monika Nawrocka; Michal Krzysztofik; Adam Zajac
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.193

9.  Relationship between fatigue index and number of repetition maxima with sub-maximal loads in biceps curl.

Authors:  Ekim Pekünlü; Ozan Atalağ
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.193

10.  Validity and Reliability of Kinematics Measured with PUSH Band vs. Linear Encoder in Bench Press and Push-Ups.

Authors:  Roland van den Tillaar; Nick Ball
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.