Literature DB >> 29447936

Inducing hypertrophic effects of type I skeletal muscle fibers: A hypothetical role of time under load in resistance training aimed at muscular hypertrophy.

Jozo Grgic1, Jan Homolak2, Pavle Mikulic3, Javier Botella4, Brad J Schoenfeld5.   

Abstract

An emerging body of evidence is starting to suggest that the hypertrophy of skeletal muscle fibers might be load specific. In other words, it may be that resistance training with high loads (i.e., ≥60% of 1 repetition maximum [RM]) emphasizes a greater growth of type II muscle fibers, while resistance training with low loads (i.e., <60% of 1RM) might primarily augment hypertrophy of type I muscle fibers. Type I and type II muscle fibers possess certain distinct characteristics, with type II muscle fibers having faster calcium kinetics, faster shortening velocities, and ability to generate more power than type I muscle fibers. Alternatively, compared to type II fibers, type I muscle fibers have a higher oxidative capacity and a higher fatigue threshold. Due to the lower fatigability of type I muscle fibers, it may be hypothesized that a greater time under load is necessary to stimulate an accentuated growth of these fibers. An increase in time under load can be achieved when training with lower loads (e.g., 30% of 1RM) and to momentary muscular failure. The present paper discusses the hypothesis that a greater hypertrophy of type I muscle fibers may be induced with low load resistance training.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exercise; Loading; Musculoskeletal; Resistance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29447936     DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2018.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Hypotheses        ISSN: 0306-9877            Impact factor:   1.538


  7 in total

1.  Effects of a high-volume static stretching programme on plantar-flexor muscle strength and architecture.

Authors:  Kaoru Yahata; Andreas Konrad; Shigeru Sato; Ryosuke Kiyono; Riku Yoshida; Taizan Fukaya; João Pedro Nunes; Masatoshi Nakamura
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Muscle growth adaptations to high-load training and low-load training with blood flow restriction in calf muscles.

Authors:  Ryo Kataoka; Ecaterina Vasenina; William B Hammert; Adam H Ibrahim; Scott J Dankel; Samuel L Buckner
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Contrast Tempo of Movement and Its Effect on Power Output and Bar Velocity During Resistance Exercise.

Authors:  Michal Wilk; Jakub Jarosz; Michal Krzysztofik; Aleksandra Filip-Stachnik; Marcin Bialas; Agata Rzeszutko-Belzowska; Adam Zajac; Petr Stastny
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Acute Neuromuscular and Hormonal Responses to Power, Strength, and Hypertrophic Protocols and Training Background.

Authors:  Johanna Kotikangas; Simon Walker; Sara Toivonen; Heikki Peltonen; Keijo Häkkinen
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-07-14

5.  Are the Hypertrophic Adaptations to High and Low-Load Resistance Training Muscle Fiber Type Specific?

Authors:  Jozo Grgic; Brad J Schoenfeld
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Effects of Pre-exhaustion Versus Traditional Resistance Training on Training Volume, Maximal Strength, and Quadriceps Hypertrophy.

Authors:  Thiago Barbosa Trindade; Jonato Prestes; Leônidas Oliveira Neto; Radamés Maciel Vitor Medeiros; Ramires Alsamir Tibana; Nuno Manuel Frade de Sousa; Eduardo Estevan Santana; Breno Guilherme de A T Cabral; Whitley Jo Stone; Paulo Moreira Silva Dantas
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Can the Cambered Bar Enhance Acute Performance in the Bench Press Exercise?

Authors:  Michal Krzysztofik; Adam Zajac; Piotr Żmijewski; Michal Wilk
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.566

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.