Literature DB >> 33546152

Bilateral Ultrathin Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty vs. Bilateral Penetrating Keratoplasty in Fuchs' Dystrophy: Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations, Contrast Sensitivity and Quality of Life.

Massimo Castellucci1, Costanza Novara1, Alessandra Casuccio2, Giovannni Cillino1, Carla Giordano3, Valentina Failla1, Vincenza Bonfiglio1, Maria Vadalà1, Salvatore Cillino1.   

Abstract

Background and
Objectives: The objective of this paper is to compare the visual outcomes and quality of life (QoL) after bilateral ultrathin Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) with bilateral penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy (FED). Materials and
Methods: Retrospective comparative cohort study, including 11 patients with FED who underwent bilateral PK and 13 patients with FED who underwent bilateral UT-DSAEK. All patients were already pseudophakic or had undergone a combined cataract procedure. The main outcomes were corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs), contrast sensitivity (CS) and quality of life (QoL).
Results: The mean follow-up after the second eye surgery was 32.5 ± 10.2 months in PK and 19.6 ± 8.6 months in UT-DSAEK patients. The CDVA in the UT-DSAEK group was significantly better than in the PK one (0.18 ± 0.07 vs. 0.35 ± 0.16 logMAR, p < 0.0001). The mean anterior corneal total HOAs of the central 5 mm were significantly lower in UT-DSAEK eyes than in PK eyes (0.438 ± 0.078 µ and 1.282 ± 0.330 µ respectively, p < 0.0001), whilst the mean posterior total HOAs did not differ between groups (0.196 ± 0.056 µ and 0.231 ± 0.089 µ, respectively, p = 0.253). The CS was lower at 0.75 and 1.5 cycles/degree in P the K group when compared to the DSAEK one (p = 0.008 and 0.005, respectively). The QoL scores by the NEI RQL-42 test exhibited better values in DSAEK patients in 9 out of 13 scales.
Conclusion: Our study confirms that UT-DSAEK provides a better visual function in terms of CDVA and CS, together with lower HOAs, when compared to PK. Hence, the vision-related QoL, binocularly evaluated by the NEI RQL-42 items, indicates a higher satisfaction in UT-DSAEK eyes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bilateral penetrating keratoplasty; bilateral ultrathin DSAEK; contrast sensitivity; higher-order aberrations; quality of life; visual acuity

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33546152      PMCID: PMC7913208          DOI: 10.3390/medicina57020133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)        ISSN: 1010-660X            Impact factor:   2.430


  40 in total

Review 1.  Endothelial keratoplasty: a revolution in evolution.

Authors:  Arundhati Anshu; Marianne O Price; Donald T H Tan; Francis W Price
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.048

2.  Comparison of visual function between phakic eyes and pseudophakic eyes with a monofocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Ken Hayashi; Motoaki Yoshida; Shin-ichi Manabe; Hideyuki Hayashi
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Visual Outcomes and Graft Thickness in Microthin DSAEK--One-Year Results.

Authors:  Harry W Roberts; Achyut Mukherjee; Heidi Aichner; Madhavan S Rajan
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  Closed-chamber pulling-injection system for donor graft insertion in endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Claudio Macaluso
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Long-term Visual Outcomes Comparing Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Matthias Fuest; Marcus Ang; Hla Myint Htoon; Donald Tan; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Technique for Preparing Ultrathin and Nanothin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Tissue.

Authors:  Albert Y Cheung; Joshua H Hou; Peter Bedard; Veronique Grimes; Natalie Buckman; Medi Eslani; Edward J Holland
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

Authors:  Gerrit R J Melles; T San Ong; Bob Ververs; Jacqueline van der Wees
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.651

8.  Retrospective contralateral study comparing descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Irit Bahar; Igor Kaiserman; Eliya Levinger; Wiwan Sansanayudh; Allan R Slomovic; David S Rootman
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  Pentacam assessment of posterior lamellar grafts to explain hyperopization after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Vincenzo Scorcia; Stefania Matteoni; Giovanni Battista Scorcia; Giovanni Scorcia; Massimo Busin
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Effects of graft thickness and asymmetry on visual gain and aberrations after descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Mor M Dickman; Yanny Y Y Cheng; Tos T J M Berendschot; Frank J H M van den Biggelaar; Rudy M M A Nuijts
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 7.389

View more
  2 in total

1.  Demographic profile and clinical course of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy in Mexican patients.

Authors:  Maximiliano Barrera-Sanchez; Julio C Hernandez-Camarena; Raul E Ruiz-Lozano; Jorge E Valdez-Garcia; Alejandro Rodriguez-Garcia
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-11-07       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 2.  Current Perspectives on Corneal Transplantation.

Authors:  Siyin Liu; Yee Ling Wong; Andrew Walkden
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.