Literature DB >> 28739420

Long-term Visual Outcomes Comparing Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty.

Matthias Fuest1, Marcus Ang2, Hla Myint Htoon3, Donald Tan2, Jodhbir S Mehta4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare 5-year visual acuity and refraction outcome in Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED) or bullous keratopathy (BK) in Asian eyes.
DESIGN: Prospective interventional case series.
METHODS: We analyzed 828 consecutive cases of DSAEK (423) or PK (405) for FED and BK from the Singapore Cornea Transplant Registry performed from 1991 to 2011. Our main outcome measures were best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) with astigmatism (cylinder) and spherical equivalent (SE) over 5 years of follow-up.
RESULTS: Mean age was 67.5 ± 11.5 years (50.1% male, 49.9% female) and majority was Chinese (76.6%, n = 634) in our multiracial Asian population. DSAEK eyes had significantly better BSCVA (P < .001-.037) with lower SE (P < .001-.017) and cylinder (P < .001), independent of surgical indication, compared to PK over 5 years. DSAEK was superior to PK over 5 years (P < .001-.026) in FED, but only over 3 years in BK (P < .001-.031). DSAEK in FED eyes had significantly better BSCVA compared to BK eyes (P = .006 at 4-year follow-up). DSAEKs with preoperative BSCVA < 1.3 logMAR had significantly better visual outcomes than cases with ≥ 1.3 logMAR (P < .001-.042). PKs had significantly higher postoperative refractive correction than DSAEKs, with no significant influence of the surgery indication.
CONCLUSIONS: In our study cohort, DSAEK provided significantly better long-term BSCVA and lower astigmatism than PK over 5 years of follow-up. Visual outcomes of DSAEK for FED were better than BK. In some analyses for years 1-3, analysis of covariance adjustment indicated that this DSAEK-associated better long-term BSCVA was independent of better preoperative vision in DSAEK eyes.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28739420     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  12 in total

Review 1.  Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy and corneal endothelial diseases: East meets West.

Authors:  Y Q Soh; Viridiana Kocaba; Mauricio Pinto; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  "Endothelium-Out" and "Endothelium-In" Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) Graft Insertion Techniques: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hon Shing Ong; Hla M Htoon; Marcus Ang; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-14

3.  Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet Stripping Automated Keratoplasty - Outcome of One Single Surgeon's More Than 200 Initial Consecutive Cases.

Authors:  Christina Jansen; Madeleine Zetterberg
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-02

4.  Bilateral Ultrathin Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty vs. Bilateral Penetrating Keratoplasty in Fuchs' Dystrophy: Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations, Contrast Sensitivity and Quality of Life.

Authors:  Massimo Castellucci; Costanza Novara; Alessandra Casuccio; Giovannni Cillino; Carla Giordano; Valentina Failla; Vincenza Bonfiglio; Maria Vadalà; Salvatore Cillino
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.430

5.  A Novel Approach of Harvesting Viable Single Cells from Donor Corneal Endothelium for Cell-Injection Therapy.

Authors:  Hon Shing Ong; Gary Peh; Dawn Jin Hui Neo; Heng-Pei Ang; Khadijah Adnan; Chan Lwin Nyein; Fernando Morales-Wong; Maninder Bhogal; Viridiana Kocaba; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 6.600

6.  Clinical Outcomes of Penetrating Keratoplasty and Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Asian Population with American Corneas.

Authors:  Fang-Chi Hsiao; Po-Yuan Chen; Yaa-Jyuhn James Meir; Hsin-Yuan Tan; Ching-Hsi Hsiao; Hsin-Chiung Lin; David Hui-Kang Ma; Lung-Kun Yeh; Wei-Chi Wu; Hung-Chi Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-17       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  Evolution of therapies for the corneal endothelium: past, present and future approaches.

Authors:  Hon Shing Ong; Marcus Ang; Jodhbir Mehta
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Long-Term Observation and Sequencing Analysis of SKPs-Derived Corneal Endothelial Cell-Like Cells for Treating Corneal Endothelial Dysfunction.

Authors:  Lin Shen; Peng Sun; Liqun Du; Jing Zhu; Chengqun Ju; Hui Guo; Xinyi Wu
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  Corneal transplantation for Fuchs´ endothelial dystrophy: A comparison of three surgical techniques concerning 10 year graft survival and visual function.

Authors:  Jeroen van Rooij; Elsina H Lucas; Annette J Geerards; Lies Remeijer; Rene Wubbels
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Repeat keratoplasty in failed Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Manpreet Kaur; Jeewan S Titiyal; Meghal Gagrani; Farin Shaikh; Tushar Agarwal; Rajesh Sinha; Namrata Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.