Literature DB >> 19643500

Pentacam assessment of posterior lamellar grafts to explain hyperopization after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Vincenzo Scorcia1, Stefania Matteoni, Giovanni Battista Scorcia, Giovanni Scorcia, Massimo Busin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate changes in posterior corneal curvature as a possible cause of the hyperopic refractive shift observed after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).
DESIGN: Prospective, noncomparative, interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-four eyes of 29 patients with Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy or pseudophakic bullous keratopathy.
METHODS: A standard DSAEK procedure was performed in 34 eyes using the pull-through technique for graft delivery. When cataract was present (n = 7), phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation was combined. Each eye underwent Pentacam (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) evaluation 1, 3, and 12 months after surgery. Corneal graft thickness was calculated on Scheimpflug scans at 9 locations (1 central, 4 peripheral, and 4 mid peripheral). The mean radius of posterior corneal curvature (Rm) was recorded. At each postoperative examination time, manifest refraction was determined and compared with pre-DSAEK values in simple procedures or with intended postoperative refraction, if cataract surgery had been performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Manifest refraction, Rm, and corneal graft thickness at 1, 3, and 12 months after surgery.
RESULTS: The mean+/-standard deviation posterior corneal curvature was 6.5+/-0.56 mm before surgery and varied from 5.52+/-0.39 mm 1 month after surgery to 5.83+/-0.37 mm at 3 months after surgery and 5.92+/-0.35 mm at 12 months after surgery. The grafts were significantly thicker in the periphery and mid periphery than in the center at all examination times. Thickening diminished significantly over time at all locations. The average reduction of corneal thickness was higher at the edges (91.5 microm) than in the mid periphery (38.3 microm) or in the center (24.2 microm). The average postoperative spherical equivalent+/-standard deviation changed from -0.31+/-2.35 diopters (D) before surgery to 1.03+/-2.21 D 1 month after surgery, 0.61+/-2.07 D 3 months after surgery, and +0.31+/-2.03 D 12 months after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The difference in thickness between center and periphery of the DSAEK graft induces a change in posterior corneal curvature, resulting in a hyperopic shift that decreases with time and is negligible for spectacle correction. However, when performing a triple procedure, intraocular lens selection should take into account the refractive change induced by DSAEK. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19643500     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.04.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  20 in total

1.  [Refractive changes after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty].

Authors:  T Röck; K U Bartz-Schmidt; D Röck; E Yoeruek
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Using the posterior to anterior corneal curvature radii ratio to minimize the risk of a postoperative hyperopic shift after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Raphael Diener; Nicole Eter; Maged Alnawaiseh
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  [Perspectives of posterior lamellar keratoplasty. In search of the perfect lamella].

Authors:  S Heinzelmann; P Maier; T Reinhard
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Retrospective contralateral study comparing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty with Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  A-K B Maier; E Gundlach; J Gonnermann; M K J Klamann; E Bertelmann; P W Rieck; A M Joussen; N Torun
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Excimer laser smoothing of endothelial keratoplasty grafts.

Authors:  Catherine Cleary; Ying Liu; Maolong Tang; Yan Li; Christopher Stoeger; David Huang
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.651

6.  Comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Shreya S Prabhu; Rola Kaakeh; Alan Sugar; Dean G Smith; Roni M Shtein
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-08       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Visual outcome and histological findings following femtosecond laser-assisted versus microkeratome-assisted DSAEK.

Authors:  S Heinzelmann; P Maier; D Böhringer; C Auw-Hädrich; T Reinhard
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Corneal back surface radius after DSEK and DSAEK: a comparative single surgeon case control study.

Authors:  Jan D Unterlauft; Katharina Elsässer; Wolfgang Haigis; Gerd Geerling
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 9.  Eye-bank preparation of endothelial tissue.

Authors:  Grace E Boynton; Maria A Woodward
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.761

10.  Anterior Chamber Characteristics, Endothelial Parameters, and Corneal Densitometry After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Patients With Fuchs Dystrophy.

Authors:  Remzi Karadag; Kristin M Hammersmith; Parveen K Nagra; Christopher J Rapuano
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2021-04-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.