Literature DB >> 33544731

Information retrieval interfaces in virtual reality-A scoping review focused on current generation technology.

Maurice Schleußinger1.   

Abstract

The Information Retrieval user experience has remained largely unchanged since its inception for computers and mobile devices alike. However, recent developments in Virtual Reality hardware (pioneered by Oculus Rift in 2013) could introduce a new environment for Information Retrieval. This paper reports the results of a Scoping Literature Review (PRISMA-ScR) by rigorously examining the entire body of relevant literature with reproducible methods. The following research questions are answered: "What prototypes and concepts of Virtual Reality Information Retrieval systems with current generation hardware exist?", "How are user interaction and especially user input realised in these systems?", "What Retrieval features are used in these systems?", "How are search results displayed in these systems?" and "Can these VR IR systems compare to traditional (non-VR) IR systems?". After querying Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science, 1042 documents were reviewed in depth. Key features and attributes of the systems are summarised and discussed. Sketches of the user interfaces are included as well. The 30 documents that were relevant to the research questions include 16 distinct systems or theories. They discuss and utilise several user input technologies, ranging from controllers, voice input or hand tracking. Although conventional retrieval features are less common, systems enable retrieval of literature, 3D objects, images, books and texts and arrange them in a virtual space (e.g. as grids, arcs or maps). Finally, many of these systems were compared to conventional counterparts through user evaluation (n = 10). Most found user task times to be shorter or equal (n = 5, n = 3). In the seven papers that measured user performance (rate of correct solutions), three reported better performance (one equal). Notably, users always were more satisfied with the Virtual Reality systems compared to conventional ones. Possible limitations of these evaluations are demographic selection and the quality of baseline systems (control).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33544731      PMCID: PMC7864671          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  7 in total

Review 1.  Information retrieval: an overview of system characteristics.

Authors:  F Wiesman; A Hasman; H J van den Herik
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.046

Review 2.  Application of virtual reality technology in clinical medicine.

Authors:  Lan Li; Fei Yu; Dongquan Shi; Jianping Shi; Zongjun Tian; Jiquan Yang; Xingsong Wang; Qing Jiang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.

Authors:  Andrea C Tricco; Erin Lillie; Wasifa Zarin; Kelly K O'Brien; Heather Colquhoun; Danielle Levac; David Moher; Micah D J Peters; Tanya Horsley; Laura Weeks; Susanne Hempel; Elie A Akl; Christine Chang; Jessie McGowan; Lesley Stewart; Lisa Hartling; Adrian Aldcroft; Michael G Wilson; Chantelle Garritty; Simon Lewin; Christina M Godfrey; Marilyn T Macdonald; Etienne V Langlois; Karla Soares-Weiser; Jo Moriarty; Tammy Clifford; Özge Tunçalp; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 4.  Information retrieval interfaces in virtual reality-A scoping review focused on current generation technology.

Authors:  Maurice Schleußinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.

Authors:  Zachary Munn; Micah D J Peters; Cindy Stern; Catalin Tufanaru; Alexa McArthur; Edoardo Aromataris
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  A Critical Review of the Use of Virtual Reality in Construction Engineering Education and Training.

Authors:  Peng Wang; Peng Wu; Jun Wang; Hung-Lin Chi; Xiangyu Wang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Information retrieval interfaces in virtual reality-A scoping review focused on current generation technology.

Authors:  Maurice Schleußinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.