Literature DB >> 33537084

Large-scale tumor-associated collagen signatures identify high-risk breast cancer patients.

Gangqin Xi1, Wenhui Guo2, Deyong Kang3, Jianli Ma4, Fangmeng Fu2, Lida Qiu1,5, Liqin Zheng1, Jiajia He1, Na Fang1,6, Jianhua Chen1,7, Jingtong Li8, Shuangmu Zhuo1, Xiaoxia Liao9, Haohua Tu10, Lianhuang Li1, Qingyuan Zhang8, Chuan Wang2, Stephen A Boppart10, Jianxin Chen1.   

Abstract

The notion of personalized medicine demands proper prognostic biomarkers to guide the optimal therapy for an invasive breast cancer patient. However, various risk prediction models based on conventional clinicopathological factors and emergent molecular assays have been frequently limited by either a low strength of prognosis or restricted applicability to specific types of patients. Therefore, there is a critical need to develop a strong and general prognosticator.
Methods: We observed five large-scale tumor-associated collagen signatures (TACS4-8) obtained by multiphoton microscopy at the invasion front of the breast primary tumor, which contrasted with the three tumor-associated collagen signatures (TACS1-3) discovered by Keely and coworkers at a smaller scale. Highly concordant TACS1-8 classifications were obtained by three independent observers. Using the ridge regression analysis, we obtained a TACS-score for each patient based on the combined TACS1-8 and established a risk prediction model based on the TACS-score. In a blind fashion, consistent retrospective prognosis was obtained from 995 breast cancer patients in both a training cohort (n= 431) and an internal validation cohort (n = 300) collected from one clinical center, and in an external validation cohort (n = 264) collected from a different clinical center.
Results: TACS1-8 model alone competed favorably with all reported models in predicting disease-free survival (AUC: 0.838, [0.800-0.872]; 0.827, [0.779-0.868]; 0.807, [0.754-0.853] in the three cohorts) and stratifying low- and high-risk patients (HR 7.032, [4.869-10.158]; 6.846, [4.370-10.726], 4.423, [2.917-6.708]). The combination of these factors with the TACS-score into a nomogram model further improved the prognosis (AUC: 0.865, [0.829-0.896]; 0.861, [0.816-0.898]; 0.854, [0.805-0.894]; HR 7.882, [5.487-11.323]; 9.176, [5.683-14.816], and 5.548, [3.705-8.307]). The nomogram identified 72 of 357 (~20%) patients with unsuccessful 5-year disease-free survival that might have been undertreated postoperatively. Conclusions: The risk prediction model based on TACS1-8 considerably outperforms the contextual clinical model and may thus convince pathologists to pursue a TACS-based breast cancer prognosis. Our methodology identifies a significant portion of patients susceptible to undertreatment (high-risk patients), in contrast to the multigene assays that often strive to mitigate overtreatment. The compatibility of our methodology with standard histology using traditional (non-tissue-microarray) formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections could simplify subsequent clinical translation. © The author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; disease-free survival; multiphoton imaging; tumor-associated collagen signatures

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33537084      PMCID: PMC7847696          DOI: 10.7150/thno.55921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theranostics        ISSN: 1838-7640            Impact factor:   11.556


  44 in total

1.  Molecular profiling: moving away from tumor philately.

Authors:  Jorge S Reis-Filho; Britta Weigelt; Debora Fumagalli; Christos Sotiriou
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 2.  Progress and promise: highlights of the international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2007.

Authors:  A Goldhirsch; W C Wood; R D Gelber; A S Coates; B Thürlimann; H-J Senn
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Picrosirius red staining: a useful tool to appraise collagen networks in normal and pathological tissues.

Authors:  Raed Lattouf; Ronald Younes; Didier Lutomski; Nada Naaman; Gaston Godeau; Karim Senni; Sylvie Changotade
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 4.  The tumour microenvironment as a target for chemoprevention.

Authors:  Adriana Albini; Michael B Sporn
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 5.  Breast cancer metastasis: markers and models.

Authors:  Britta Weigelt; Johannes L Peterse; Laura J van 't Veer
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Personalized Prognostic Prediction Models for Breast Cancer Recurrence and Survival Incorporating Multidimensional Data.

Authors:  Xifeng Wu; Yuanqing Ye; Carlos H Barcenas; Wong-Ho Chow; Qing H Meng; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Michelle A T Hildebrandt; Hua Zhao; Xiangjun Gu; Yang Deng; Elizabeth Wagar; Francisco J Esteva; Debu Tripathy; Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Clinical utility of gene-expression signatures in early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Maryann Kwa; Andreas Makris; Francisco J Esteva
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Extracellular matrix signature identifies breast cancer subgroups with different clinical outcome.

Authors:  A Bergamaschi; E Tagliabue; T Sørlie; B Naume; T Triulzi; R Orlandi; H G Russnes; J M Nesland; R Tammi; P Auvinen; V-M Kosma; S Ménard; A-L Børresen-Dale
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 9.  Hooked on fat: the role of lipid synthesis in cancer metabolism and tumour development.

Authors:  Franziska Baenke; Barrie Peck; Heike Miess; Almut Schulze
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.758

10.  Local 3D matrix microenvironment regulates cell migration through spatiotemporal dynamics of contractility-dependent adhesions.

Authors:  Andrew D Doyle; Nicole Carvajal; Albert Jin; Kazue Matsumoto; Kenneth M Yamada
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  10 in total

1.  Polarization enhanced laparoscope for improved visualization of tissue structural changes associated with peritoneal cancer metastasis.

Authors:  Robert M Trout; Einstein Gnanatheepam; Ahmed Gado; Christopher Reik; Jessica C Ramella-Roman; Martin Hunter; Thomas Schnelldorfer; Irene Georgakoudi
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.562

2.  Label-free multimodal nonlinear optical imaging of needle biopsy cores for intraoperative cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Lingxiao Yang; Jaena Park; Eric J Chaney; Janet E Sorrells; Marina Marjanovic; Heidi Phillips; Darold R Spillman; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 3.758

3.  Association of the collagen signature with pathological complete response in rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Wei Jiang; Shijie Wang; Jinliang Wan; Jixiang Zheng; Xiaoyu Dong; Zhangyuanzhu Liu; Guangxing Wang; Shuoyu Xu; Weiwei Xiao; Yuanhong Gao; Shuangmu Zhuo; Jun Yan
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 6.518

4.  Label-free metabolic and structural profiling of dynamic biological samples using multimodal optical microscopy with sensorless adaptive optics.

Authors:  Rishyashring R Iyer; Janet E Sorrells; Lingxiao Yang; Eric J Chaney; Darold R Spillman; Brian E Tibble; Carlos A Renteria; Haohua Tu; Mantas Žurauskas; Marina Marjanovic; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Development and Validation of a Four Adenosine-to-Inosine RNA Editing Site-Relevant Prognostic Signature for Assessing Survival in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Jian Wan; Shizhen Chen; Anqin Zhang; Yiting Liu; Yangyang Zhang; Qinghua Li; Ziqi Yu; Yuwei Wan; Lei Yang; Qi Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  Intratumor graph neural network recovers hidden prognostic value of multi-biomarker spatial heterogeneity.

Authors:  Lida Qiu; Deyong Kang; Chuan Wang; Wenhui Guo; Fangmeng Fu; Qingxiang Wu; Gangqin Xi; Jiajia He; Liqin Zheng; Qingyuan Zhang; Xiaoxia Liao; Lianhuang Li; Jianxin Chen; Haohua Tu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 17.694

7.  Multiphoton microscopy providing pathological-level quantification of myocardial fibrosis in transplanted human heart.

Authors:  Yuelong Yang; Liqin Zheng; Zhen Li; Jianhua Chen; Xinyi Wu; Guanmin Ren; Zebin Xiao; Xiaodan Li; Wei Luo; Zhigang Wu; Liming Nie; Jianxin Chen; Hui Liu
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 2.555

Review 8.  Targeting the extracellular matrix for immunomodulation: applications in drug delivery and cell therapies.

Authors:  Samira Aghlara-Fotovat; Amanda Nash; Boram Kim; Robert Krencik; Omid Veiseh
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 4.617

9.  Characterizing the Invasive Tumor Front of Aggressive Uterine Adenocarcinoma and Leiomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Sabina Sanegre; Núria Eritja; Carlos de Andrea; Juan Diaz-Martin; Ángel Diaz-Lagares; María Amalia Jácome; Carmen Salguero-Aranda; David García Ros; Ben Davidson; Rafel Lopez; Ignacio Melero; Samuel Navarro; Santiago Ramon Y Cajal; Enrique de Alava; Xavier Matias-Guiu; Rosa Noguera
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-06-03

Review 10.  Aligned forces: Origins and mechanisms of cancer dissemination guided by extracellular matrix architecture.

Authors:  Arja Ray; Paolo P Provenzano
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 8.386

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.