Literature DB >> 28376179

Personalized Prognostic Prediction Models for Breast Cancer Recurrence and Survival Incorporating Multidimensional Data.

Xifeng Wu1, Yuanqing Ye1, Carlos H Barcenas2, Wong-Ho Chow1, Qing H Meng3, Mariana Chavez-MacGregor2,4, Michelle A T Hildebrandt1, Hua Zhao1, Xiangjun Gu1, Yang Deng1, Elizabeth Wagar3, Francisco J Esteva5, Debu Tripathy2, Gabriel N Hortobagyi2.   

Abstract

Background: In this study, we developed integrative, personalized prognostic models for breast cancer recurrence and overall survival (OS) that consider receptor subtypes, epidemiological data, quality of life (QoL), and treatment.
Methods: A total of 15 314 women with stage I to III invasive primary breast cancer treated at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between 1997 and 2012 were used to generate prognostic models by Cox regression analysis in a two-stage study. Model performance was assessed by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) and calibration analysis and compared with Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) and PREDICT.
Results: Host characteristics were assessed for 10 809 women as the discovery population (median follow-up = 6.09 years, 1144 recurrence and 1627 deaths) and 4505 women as the validation population (median follow-up = 7.95 years, 684 recurrence and 1095 deaths). In addition to the known clinical/pathological variables, the model for recurrence included alcohol consumption while the model for OS included smoking status and physical component summary score. The AUCs for recurrence and OS were 0.813 and 0.810 in the discovery and 0.807 and 0.803 in the validation, respectively, compared with AUCs of 0.761 and 0.753 in discovery and 0.777 and 0.751 in validation for NPI. Our model further showed better calibration compared with PREDICT. We also developed race-specific and receptor subtype-specific models with comparable AUCs. Racial disparity was evident in the distributions of many risk factors and clinical presentation of the disease. Conclusions: Our integrative prognostic models for breast cancer exhibit high discriminatory accuracy and excellent calibration and are the first to incorporate receptor subtype and epidemiological and QoL data.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28376179      PMCID: PMC6279311          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djw314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  41 in total

1.  Baseline health-related quality-of-life data as prognostic factors in a phase III multicentre study of women with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  F Efficace; L Biganzoli; M Piccart; C Coens; K Van Steen; T Cufer; R E Coleman; H A Calvert; T Gamucci; C Twelves; P Fargeot; A Bottomley
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  A multi-institutional analysis of the socioeconomic determinants of breast reconstruction: a study of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

Authors:  Caprice K Christian; Joyce Niland; Stephen B Edge; Rebecca A Ottesen; Melissa E Hughes; Richard Theriault; John Wilson; Charles A Hergrueter; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Quality of life after breast cancer diagnosis and survival.

Authors:  Meira Epplein; Ying Zheng; Wei Zheng; Zhi Chen; Kai Gu; David Penson; Wei Lu; Xiao-Ou Shu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction.

Authors:  Nancy R Cook
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Race and family history assessment for breast cancer.

Authors:  Harvey J Murff; Daniel Byrne; Jennifer S Haas; Ann Louise Puopolo; Troyen A Brennan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Racial/ethnic differences in quality of life after diagnosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Nancy K Janz; Mahasin S Mujahid; Sarah T Hawley; Jennifer J Griggs; Amy Alderman; Ann S Hamilton; John Graff; Steven J Katz
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 4.442

7.  Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes.

Authors:  Joel S Parker; Michael Mullins; Maggie C U Cheang; Samuel Leung; David Voduc; Tammi Vickery; Sherri Davies; Christiane Fauron; Xiaping He; Zhiyuan Hu; John F Quackenbush; Inge J Stijleman; Juan Palazzo; J S Marron; Andrew B Nobel; Elaine Mardis; Torsten O Nielsen; Matthew J Ellis; Charles M Perou; Philip S Bernard
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Alcohol consumption and survival after a breast cancer diagnosis: a literature-based meta-analysis and collaborative analysis of data for 29,239 cases.

Authors:  Alaa M G Ali; Marjanka K Schmidt; Manjeet K Bolla; Qin Wang; M Gago-Dominguez; J Esteban Castelao; Angel Carracedo; Victor Muñoz Garzón; Stig E Bojesen; Børge G Nordestgaard; Henrik Flyger; Jenny Chang-Claude; Alina Vrieling; Anja Rudolph; Petra Seibold; Heli Nevanlinna; Taru A Muranen; Kirsimari Aaltonen; Carl Blomqvist; Keitaro Matsuo; Hidemi Ito; Hiroji Iwata; Akiyo Horio; Esther M John; Mark Sherman; Jolanta Lissowska; Jonine Figueroa; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Hoda Anton-Culver; Mitul Shah; John L Hopper; Antonia Trichopoulou; Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Vittorio Krogh; Elisabete Weiderpass; Anne Andersson; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Laure Dossus; Guy Fagherazzi; Petra H Peeters; Anja Olsen; Gordon C Wishart; Douglas F Easton; Signe Borgquist; Kim Overvad; Aurelio Barricarte; Carlos A González; María-José Sánchez; Pilar Amiano; Elio Riboli; Tim Key; Paul D Pharoah
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Development of novel breast cancer recurrence prediction model using support vector machine.

Authors:  Woojae Kim; Ku Sang Kim; Jeong Eon Lee; Dong-Young Noh; Sung-Won Kim; Yong Sik Jung; Man Young Park; Rae Woong Park
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.588

10.  PREDICT Plus: development and validation of a prognostic model for early breast cancer that includes HER2.

Authors:  G C Wishart; C D Bajdik; E Dicks; E Provenzano; M K Schmidt; M Sherman; D C Greenberg; A R Green; K A Gelmon; V-M Kosma; J E Olson; M W Beckmann; R Winqvist; S S Cross; G Severi; D Huntsman; K Pylkäs; I Ellis; T O Nielsen; G Giles; C Blomqvist; P A Fasching; F J Couch; E Rakha; W D Foulkes; F M Blows; L R Bégin; L J van't Veer; M Southey; H Nevanlinna; A Mannermaa; A Cox; M Cheang; L Baglietto; C Caldas; M Garcia-Closas; P D P Pharoah
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Racial disparity in breast cancer: can it be mattered for prognosis and therapy.

Authors:  Vijayalaxmi Gupta; Inamul Haque; Jinia Chakraborty; Stephanie Graff; Snigdha Banerjee; Sushanta K Banerjee
Journal:  J Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.782

2.  Racial Disparity Among Women Diagnosed With Invasive Breast Cancer in a Large Integrated Health System.

Authors:  Maharaj Singh; Santhi D Konduri; George C Bobustuc; Amin B Kassam; Richard A Rovin
Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev       Date:  2018-07-30

3.  Prediction models for breast cancer prognosis among Asian women.

Authors:  Run Fan; Yufan Chen; Sarah Nechuta; Hui Cai; Kai Gu; Liang Shi; Pingping Bao; Yu Shyr; Xiao-Ou Shu; Fei Ye
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 6.921

4.  Differential presentation and survival of de novo and recurrent metastatic breast cancer over time: 1990-2010.

Authors:  Judith A Malmgren; Musa Mayer; Mary K Atwood; Henry G Kaplan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Prognostic value of routine laboratory variables in prediction of breast cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Zhu Zhu; Ling Li; Zhong Ye; Tong Fu; Ye Du; Aiping Shi; Di Wu; Ke Li; Yifan Zhu; Chun Wang; Zhimin Fan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  SALMON: Survival Analysis Learning With Multi-Omics Neural Networks on Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Zhi Huang; Xiaohui Zhan; Shunian Xiang; Travis S Johnson; Bryan Helm; Christina Y Yu; Jie Zhang; Paul Salama; Maher Rizkalla; Zhi Han; Kun Huang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Comparison of Residual Risk-Based Eligibility vs Tumor Size and Nodal Status for Power Estimates in Adjuvant Trials of Breast Cancer Therapies.

Authors:  Wei Wei; Tomoko Kurita; Kenneth R Hess; Tara Sanft; Borbala Szekely; Christos Hatzis; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 31.777

8.  Evaluating methodological quality of Prognostic models Including Patient-reported HeAlth outcomes iN oncologY (EPIPHANY): a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Nina Deliu; Francesco Cottone; Gary S Collins; Amélie Anota; Fabio Efficace
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Introducing novel and comprehensive models for predicting recurrence in breast cancer using the group LASSO approach: are estimates of early and late recurrence different?

Authors:  Majid Akrami; Peyman Arasteh; Tannaz Eghbali; Hadi Raeisi Shahraki; Sedigheh Tahmasebi; Vahid Zangouri; Abbas Rezaianzadeh; Abdolrasoul Talei
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 10.  Incorporation of clinical and biological factors improves prognostication and reflects contemporary clinical practice.

Authors:  Rashmi K Murthy; Juhee Song; Akshara S Raghavendra; Yisheng Li; Limin Hsu; Kenneth R Hess; Carlos H Barcenas; Vicente Valero; Robert W Carlson; Debu Tripathy; Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.