Literature DB >> 33531434

Comparison of Young Adult Female Cancer Survivors Recruited from a Population-Based Cancer Registry to Eligible Survivors.

Penelope P Howards1, Pamela J Mink2,3, Konny H Kim2, Jill J Woodard2, Ann C Mertens4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Population-based cancer registries provide a resource to recruit young adult cancer survivors who may not be easily identified otherwise.
METHODS: We compared demographic and cancer-related characteristics of participants in a cohort of female young adult cancer survivors to those of eligible survivors in the Georgia Cancer Registry, a population-based registry in the United States. We examined associations between survivor characteristics and nonparticipation using logistic regression and associations between survivor characteristics and different types of nonparticipation (refusal, unable to contact, or unresolved vs. interviewed) using polytomous regression.
RESULTS: The Georgia Cancer Registry was able to contact 60% of eligible women (3,061/5,137). Of those, 78% agreed to study contact (n = 2,378), and of those, 56% were interviewed (n = 1,342). Participation was similar across age at contact and at diagnosis but varied across cancer type from 17% for cervical cancer to 32% for breast cancer. White women were slightly more likely to be interviewed (28%) than African American women (23%), which was mostly attributable to greater difficulty in contacting African American women (odds ratio 1.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.5-2.1).
CONCLUSIONS: The greatest challenge to recruiting women was contacting them, which differed across some but not all demographic and cancer-related characteristics. When successfully contacted, most survivors agreed to participate. IMPACT: Population-based cancer registries can serve as an invaluable resource to recruit representative samples of young adult cancer survivors, who are otherwise difficult to identify. ©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33531434      PMCID: PMC8026690          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.090


  23 in total

Review 1.  Process of care failures in invasive cervical cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrea R Spence; Patricia Goggin; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  The rationale, design, and implementation of the American Cancer Society's studies of cancer survivors.

Authors:  Tenbroeck Smith; Kevin D Stein; C Christina Mehta; Chiewkwei Kaw; James L Kepner; Trent Buskirk; Jeremy Stafford; Frank Baker
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Research recruitment through US central cancer registries: balancing privacy and scientific issues.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Robert S Sandler; Morris Weinberger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Recruitment and retention results for a population-based cervical cancer biobehavioral clinical trial.

Authors:  Kathryn Osann; Lari Wenzel; Aysun Dogan; Susie Hsieh; Dana M Chase; Sandra Sappington; Bradley J Monk; Edward L Nelson
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Cervical cancer survivorship in a population based sample.

Authors:  Kimlin T Ashing-Giwa; Judith S Tejero; Jinsook Kim; Geraldine V Padilla; Marjorie Kagawa-Singer; M Belinda Tucker; Jung-Won Lim
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Unmet psychosocial needs of Pennsylvanians with cancer: 1986-2005.

Authors:  Frances K Barg; Peter F Cronholm; Joseph B Straton; Shimrit Keddem; Kathryn Knott; Joyce Grater; Peter Houts; Steven C Palmer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Population-based survivorship research using cancer registries: a study of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors.

Authors:  Neeraj K Arora; Ann S Hamilton; Arnold L Potosky; Julia H Rowland; Noreen M Aziz; Keith M Bellizzi; Carrie N Klabunde; Wendy McLaughlin; Jennifer Stevens
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.442

8.  Recruitment and follow-up of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: the AYA HOPE Study.

Authors:  Linda C Harlan; Charles F Lynch; Theresa H M Keegan; Ann S Hamilton; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Ikuko Kato; Michele M West; Rosemary D Cress; Stephen M Schwartz; Ashley W Smith; Dennis Deapen; Sonja M Stringer; Arnold L Potosky
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 4.442

9.  The medium and the message: fitting sound health promotion methodology into 160 characters.

Authors:  Megan S C Lim; Cassandra Wright; Margaret E Hellard
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 4.773

10.  Population-Based Survey Methods for Reaching Adolescent and Young Adult Survivors of Pediatric Cancer and Their Parents.

Authors:  Ann S Hamilton; Xueyan Zhuang; Denise Modjeski; Rhona Slaughter; Anamara Ritt-Olson; Joel Milam
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 1.757

View more
  1 in total

1.  Factors Associated with Unplanned Pregnancy Among Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Lisa M Shandley; Lauren M Kipling; Jessica B Spencer; Diane Morof; Ann C Mertens; Penelope P Howards
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.017

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.