INTRODUCTION: Several recent reports have recommended use of population-based cancer registries for evaluating the long-term health outcomes of cancer survivors. Drawing upon experiences from a study of survivors of non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL), we discuss conceptual and methodological challenges to and opportunities for conducting population-based survivorship research using cancer registries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Survivors of aggressive NHL diagnosed between June 1998 and August 2001, 2-5 years prior to the study, were sampled from the Los Angeles Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry. A conceptual framework was developed to systematically evaluate the association of sociodemographic, clinical, social, psychological, and behavioral factors with survivors' health-related quality of life. Data were collected primarily by a mailed questionnaire; medical records were also abstracted. RESULTS: Of 744 eligible survivors identified from the registry, 181 (24.3%) were lost to follow-up; 408 responded to the questionnaire (54.8%); 155 (20.8%) refused. Those lost to follow-up included a significantly higher proportion of younger, male, and Hispanic survivors compared to the other two groups (P <or= 0.01). There were no sociodemographic or clinical differences among the questionnaire respondents and survivors who refused study participation. Medical records were abstracted for 59.8% of the respondents. A high percentage of agreement was seen between survivors' self-report and medical record documentation of key treatments and disease status (>or=95% for survivors with complete records). CONCLUSIONS: The cancer registry served as a valuable resource for recruiting one of the largest population-based samples of NHL survivors. The methodology and example of a conceptual framework utilized in this study provide a model for future population-based cancer survivorship research.
INTRODUCTION: Several recent reports have recommended use of population-based cancer registries for evaluating the long-term health outcomes of cancer survivors. Drawing upon experiences from a study of survivors of non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL), we discuss conceptual and methodological challenges to and opportunities for conducting population-based survivorship research using cancer registries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Survivors of aggressive NHL diagnosed between June 1998 and August 2001, 2-5 years prior to the study, were sampled from the Los Angeles Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry. A conceptual framework was developed to systematically evaluate the association of sociodemographic, clinical, social, psychological, and behavioral factors with survivors' health-related quality of life. Data were collected primarily by a mailed questionnaire; medical records were also abstracted. RESULTS: Of 744 eligible survivors identified from the registry, 181 (24.3%) were lost to follow-up; 408 responded to the questionnaire (54.8%); 155 (20.8%) refused. Those lost to follow-up included a significantly higher proportion of younger, male, and Hispanic survivors compared to the other two groups (P <or= 0.01). There were no sociodemographic or clinical differences among the questionnaire respondents and survivors who refused study participation. Medical records were abstracted for 59.8% of the respondents. A high percentage of agreement was seen between survivors' self-report and medical record documentation of key treatments and disease status (>or=95% for survivors with complete records). CONCLUSIONS: The cancer registry served as a valuable resource for recruiting one of the largest population-based samples of NHL survivors. The methodology and example of a conceptual framework utilized in this study provide a model for future population-based cancer survivorship research.
Authors: David E Nelson; Gary L Kreps; Bradford W Hesse; Robert T Croyle; Gordon Willis; Neeraj K Arora; Barbara K Rimer; K V Viswanath; Neil Weinstein; Sara Alden Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2004 Sep-Oct
Authors: R K Portenoy; H T Thaler; A B Kornblith; J M Lepore; H Friedlander-Klar; E Kiyasu; K Sobel; N Coyle; N Kemeny; L Norton Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 1994 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Leslie L Robison; Ann C Mertens; John D Boice; Norman E Breslow; Sarah S Donaldson; Daniel M Green; Frederic P Li; Anna T Meadows; John J Mulvihill; Joseph P Neglia; Mark E Nesbit; Roger J Packer; John D Potter; Charles A Sklar; Malcolm A Smith; Marilyn Stovall; Louise C Strong; Yutaka Yasui; Lonnie K Zeltzer Journal: Med Pediatr Oncol Date: 2002-04
Authors: Julia H Rowland; Erin E Kent; Laura P Forsythe; Jon Håvard Loge; Lars Hjorth; Adam Glaser; Vittorio Mattioli; Sophie D Fosså Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-06-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Ellen Burke Beckjord; Neeraj K Arora; Wendy McLaughlin; Ingrid Oakley-Girvan; Ann S Hamilton; Bradford W Hesse Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2008-06-03 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Joseph M Letourneau; Erin E Ebbel; Patricia P Katz; Audra Katz; Wei Z Ai; A Jo Chien; Michelle E Melisko; Marcelle I Cedars; Mitchell P Rosen Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-09-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Laura P Forsythe; Neeraj K Arora; Catherine M Alfano; Kathryn E Weaver; Ann S Hamilton; Noreen Aziz; Julia H Rowland Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-01-12 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Corinne R Leach; Kathryn E Weaver; Noreen M Aziz; Catherine M Alfano; Keith M Bellizzi; Erin E Kent; Laura P Forsythe; Julia H Rowland Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Veenoo Agarwal; Nadia Corsini; Marion C Eckert; Greg Sharplin; Imogen Ramsey; Kate Gunn; Michael K Fitzgerald; Bogda Koczwara Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 3.603