Literature DB >> 30222486

Population-Based Survey Methods for Reaching Adolescent and Young Adult Survivors of Pediatric Cancer and Their Parents.

Ann S Hamilton1, Xueyan Zhuang1, Denise Modjeski1, Rhona Slaughter1, Anamara Ritt-Olson1, Joel Milam1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Contacting childhood cancer survivors (CCS) to assess reasons for declining receipt of follow-up care after treatment is difficult and participation in surveys may be low, resulting in biased results. We sought to demonstrate effective recruitment and population-based sampling methods to improve response and minimize bias.
METHODS: Four hundred and seventy CCS diagnosed between 2000 and 2007 at two hospitals in Los Angeles County were selected from the California Cancer Registry and were 15-25 years of age at the time of interview. Surveys of survivors and their parents were completed by multiple methods including mail, online, and telephone. Effectiveness of "plain" versus "designer" formatting of study materials was tested. Variables associated with response were analyzed using univariate and multivariable methods. Effort required for recruitment was quantified.
RESULTS: Fifty percent of survivors (n = 235) and 36.5% of parents (n = 171) responded, and there were 160 parent-child dyads among them. Among located survivors, 61% participated. Response was higher for women, parents of younger survivors, and those from higher socioeconomic status areas. Among Hispanics, no variables were related to response. More effort was required to reach men and older survivors, but efforts beyond 15 calls and 7 remailings were unproductive. Formatting (i.e., plain vs. designer) did not affect response.
CONCLUSION: Efforts to reach survivors must include multiple methods to be successful. Use of an intensive recruitment strategy and population-based sample resulted in a largely representative sample of CCS, especially for Hispanics. Expensive design efforts had little effect on recruitment, suggesting that plainer materials are sufficient. This example may inform similar studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer registry; parents; population-based sample; response bias; response rate; survey methods

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30222486      PMCID: PMC6386077          DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2018.0033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol        ISSN: 2156-5333            Impact factor:   1.757


  34 in total

Review 1.  Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review.

Authors:  Phil Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike Clarke; Carolyn DiGuiseppi; Sarah Pratap; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-18

2.  Long-term follow-up of pediatric cancer survivors: education, surveillance, and screening.

Authors:  Wendy Landier; W Hamish B Wallace; Melissa M Hudson
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.167

3.  The cost-effectiveness of cash versus lottery incentives for a web-based, stated-preference community survey.

Authors:  Aleksandra Gajic; David Cameron; Jeremiah Hurley
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-06-21

4.  Survey nonresponders to a medication-beliefs survey have worse adherence and persistence to chronic medications compared with survey responders.

Authors:  Abhijit S Gadkari; Alex Pedan; Neelam Gowda; Colleen A McHorney
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Nonresponse bias in a survey of patient perceptions of hospital care.

Authors:  Thomas V Perneger; Eric Chamot; Patrick A Bovier
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Survey nonresponse bias among young adults: the role of alcohol, tobacco, and drugs.

Authors:  Carol B Cunradi; Roland Moore; Moira Killoran; Genevieve Ames
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.164

7.  Response rates to a mailed survey targeting childhood cancer survivors: a comparison of conditional versus unconditional incentives.

Authors:  Philip M Rosoff; Cary Werner; Elizabeth C Clipp; Ann Bebe Guill; Melanie Bonner; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Recruitment and follow-up of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: the AYA HOPE Study.

Authors:  Linda C Harlan; Charles F Lynch; Theresa H M Keegan; Ann S Hamilton; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Ikuko Kato; Michele M West; Rosemary D Cress; Stephen M Schwartz; Ashley W Smith; Dennis Deapen; Sonja M Stringer; Arnold L Potosky
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 9.  Maximising response to postal questionnaires--a systematic review of randomised trials in health research.

Authors:  Rachel A Nakash; Jane L Hutton; Ellen C Jørstad-Stein; Simon Gates; Sarah E Lamb
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  High Hospitalization Rates in Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Longitudinal Follow-Up Study Using Medical Record Linkage.

Authors:  Elske Sieswerda; Anna Font-Gonzalez; Johannes B Reitsma; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Richard C Heinen; Monique W Jaspers; Helena J van der Pal; Flora E van Leeuwen; Huib N Caron; Ronald B Geskus; Leontien C Kremer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Comparison of Young Adult Female Cancer Survivors Recruited from a Population-Based Cancer Registry to Eligible Survivors.

Authors:  Penelope P Howards; Pamela J Mink; Konny H Kim; Jill J Woodard; Ann C Mertens
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 4.090

2.  Recruitment of young adult cancer survivors into a randomized controlled trial of an mHealth physical activity intervention.

Authors:  Carmina G Valle; Lindsey N Camp; Molly Diamond; Brooke T Nezami; Jessica Gokee LaRose; Bernardine M Pinto; Deborah F Tate
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 2.728

3.  Increasing clinical attendance among adolescents and young adults: a simple and novel method.

Authors:  Thivia Jegathesan; Niraj Mistry; Herbert Joseph Bonifacio; Melissa Florence; Megan Roth; Michael Sgro; Jillian Margaret Baker
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2022-07

4.  Parental Cancer-related Information Seeking, Health Communication and Satisfaction with Medical Providers of Childhood Cancer Survivors: Differences by Race/Ethnicity and Language Preference.

Authors:  Carol Y Ochoa; Kimberly A Miller; Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati; Rhona I Slaughter; Ann S Hamilton; Joel E Milam
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2021-03-10

5.  Relationships between parent and adolescent/young adult mental health among Hispanic and non-Hispanic childhood cancer survivors.

Authors:  Rhona I Slaughter; Ann S Hamilton; Julie A Cederbaum; Jennifer B Unger; Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati; Joel E Milam
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2020-09-08

6.  Project Forward: A Population-Based Cohort Among Young Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancers.

Authors:  Joel Milam; David R Freyer; Kimberly A Miller; Jessica Tobin; Katherine Y Wojcik; Cynthia N Ramirez; Anamara Ritt-Olson; Stefanie M Thomas; Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati; Michael Cousineau; Denise Modjeski; Sapna Gupta; Ann S Hamilton
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2021-07-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.