Literature DB >> 33530183

Three-day tracheal intubation manikin training for novice doctors using Macintosh laryngoscope, McGRATH MAC videolaryngoscope and Pentax AirwayScope.

Yuryo Murakami1,2, Ryusuke Ueki1, Miyuki Niki3, Munetaka Hirose1, Noriko Shimode1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We compared the intubation skills obtained by novice doctors following training using 3 instruments, the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope (Mac) and 2 types of indirect video-laryngoscopes (McGrathTM-MAC: McGrath (McG) and AirwayScope (AWS)), to determine the most appropriate instrument for novice doctors to acquire intubation skills, especially focusing on visual confirmation of vocal cords, during a 3-day intensive manikin training program.
METHODS: Fifteen novice doctors who did not have sufficient experience in endotracheal intubation (ETI) and consented to participate in this study were included. We used AirSim and AMT (Airway management Trainer) manikins. First, an experienced anesthesiologist instructed the trainees on using the 3 instruments for a few minutes. Then, after familiarizing themselves with each device for 10 minutes, the participants attempted ETI on the 2 manikins with the 3 devices used in random order. Intubations with each device were practiced and performed for 3 successive days. We assessed the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score, successful intubation rate and tracheal intubation time for each participant, with each device, and on each day.
RESULTS: In the first manikin, AirSim, POGO scores in the McG and AWS groups were significantly higher than those in the Mac group on all 3 days (P < .0001). The number of intubation failures in the Mac group decreased from 2 cases on day 1, to 1 case on day 2 and zero cases on day 3. There were no failures in the McG and AWS groups on any of the days. With the second manikin, AMT, POGO scores in the Mac group were significantly lower than those in the McG and AWS groups on all 3 days. There were no intubation failures in the AWS group on all 3 days. In the Mac group, the number of intubation failures decreased from 3 on day 1, to 2 on day 2 and zero failures on day 3. In the McG group, there were only 3 failures on day 1.
CONCLUSION: The 2 types of indirect video-laryngoscopes (McGRATH and AirwayScope) were demonstrated to be suitable instruments for novice doctors to achieve higher POGO scores in a 3-day intensive ETI training.
Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33530183      PMCID: PMC7850776          DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.817


  18 in total

1.  Airway scope versus macintosh laryngoscope in patients with simulated limitation of neck movements.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Aoi; Gaku Inagawa; Kyota Nakamura; Hitoshi Sato; Takayuki Kariya; Takahisa Goto
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2010-10

2.  Airway Scope: initial clinical experience with novice personnel.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Hirabayashi
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Description and first clinical application of AirWay Scope for tracheal intubation.

Authors:  Jun-ichi Koyama; Tatsuro Aoyama; Yoshikazu Kusano; Tatsuya Seguchi; Kyutaro Kawagishi; Tomomi Iwashita; Kazufumi Okamoto; Hiroshi Okudera; Hiroshi Takasuna; Kazuhiro Hongo
Journal:  J Neurosurg Anesthesiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.956

4.  Airway scope and gum elastic bougie with Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with simulated restricted neck mobility.

Authors:  R Komatsu; K Kamata; I Hoshi; D I Sessler; M Ozaki
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Comparison of the performance of four laryngoscopes in a high-fidelity simulator using normal and difficult airway.

Authors:  L Powell; J Andrzejowski; R Taylor; D Turnbull
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Assessment of airway visualization: validation of the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scale.

Authors:  R M Levitan; E A Ochroch; S Kush; F S Shofer; J E Hollander
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.451

7.  Learning manual skills in anesthesiology: Is there a recommended number of cases for anesthetic procedures?

Authors:  C Konrad; G Schüpfer; M Wietlisbach; H Gerber
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Evaluation of six videolaryngoscopes in 720 patients with a simulated difficult airway: a multicentre randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M Kleine-Brueggeney; R Greif; P Schoettker; G L Savoldelli; S Nabecker; L G Theiler
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  A comparison of McGrath and Macintosh laryngoscopes in novice users: a manikin study.

Authors:  D C Ray; C Billington; P K Kearns; R Kirkbride; K Mackintosh; C S Reeve; N Robinson; C J Stewart; T Trudeau
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.955

10.  A comparison of McGrath MAC® and standard direct laryngoscopy in simulated immobilized cervical spine pediatric intubation: a manikin study.

Authors:  Marcin Madziala; Jacek Smereka; Marek Dabrowski; Steve Leung; Kurt Ruetzler; Lukasz Szarpak
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.