Literature DB >> 20179653

Airway scope versus macintosh laryngoscope in patients with simulated limitation of neck movements.

Yoshihiro Aoi1, Gaku Inagawa, Kyota Nakamura, Hitoshi Sato, Takayuki Kariya, Takahisa Goto.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tracheal intubation in patients with suspected neck injuries should achieve two contradicting goals-sufficient laryngeal exposure and the least cervical spine movement. Because the former involves displacements of the cervical vertebrae, intubation under immobilization is widely performed today to prevent exacerbation of spinal code injuries. The unique curving blade of the Airway Scope (AWS) is designed to fit the oropharyngeal anatomy. A camera at the tip of the blade displays the view of the larynx, but unlike the direct laryngoscope, it needs no line-of-sight of the oral, pharyngeal, and tracheal axis. Our purpose is to determine whether AWS could be a suitable airway device for the intubation of patients with potential neck injury.
METHODS: Thirty-six patients scheduled for surgery were randomly assigned to undergo intubation using either AWS or Macintosh laryngoscope (MLS). After general anesthetic induction, the patient's head was set in a neutral position, and an appropriately sized semi-rigid neck collar was placed. Measurements include intubation time, number of attempts, success rate, Cormack-Lehane classification, airway optimization maneuver, Intubation Difficulty Scale scores, and complications.
RESULTS: Intubation time proved no statistical significance (mean ± SD, AWS, 62.9 seconds ± 26.0 seconds, MLS, 55.6 seconds ± 26.0 seconds; p = 0.42). AWS scored less in Cormack-Lehane classification (median [range], AWS I [I-I], MLS IIIa [I-IIIb]; p < 0.0001), required fewer additional airway optimization maneuvers (p = 0.0003), and scored less in Intubation Difficulty Scale scores (AWS 0 [0-1], MLS 2 [0-5]; p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: In neck-immobilized patients using semi-rigid cervical collars, AWS improves laryngeal exposure and facilitates tracheal intubation. AWS may be a suitable intubation device for trauma patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20179653     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c4529e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  13 in total

Review 1.  Prehospital use of cervical collars in trauma patients: a critical review.

Authors:  Terje Sundstrøm; Helge Asbjørnsen; Samer Habiba; Geir Arne Sunde; Knut Wester
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  A comparison of video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for the emergency intubation of trauma patients.

Authors:  Maria Michailidou; Terence O'Keeffe; Jarrod M Mosier; Randall S Friese; Bellal Joseph; Peter Rhee; John C Sakles
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  The pressure exerted on the tongue during intubation with simultaneous cervical spine immobilisation: a comparison between four videolaryngoscopes and the Macintosh laryngoscope-a manikin study.

Authors:  Dawid Aleksandrowicz; Tomasz Gaszyński
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 4.  Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation.

Authors:  Jan Hansel; Andrew M Rogers; Sharon R Lewis; Tim M Cook; Andrew F Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-04-04

Review 5.  Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Andrew R Butler; Joshua Parker; Tim M Cook; Andrew F Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-15

Review 6.  Alternative intubation techniques vs Macintosh laryngoscopy in patients with cervical spine immobilization: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  L Suppan; M R Tramèr; M Niquille; O Grosgurin; C Marti
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Efficacy of various types of laryngoscope (direct, Pentax Airway Scope and GlideScope) for endotracheal intubation in various cervical immobilisation scenarios: a randomised cross-over simulation study.

Authors:  Jong Won Kim; Kyeong Ryong Lee; Dae Young Hong; Kwang Je Baek; Young Hwan Lee; Sang O Park
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  A single-centre, randomised controlled feasibility pilot trial comparing performance of direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in surgical patients.

Authors:  Alice Loughnan; Carolyn Deng; Felicity Dominick; Lora Pencheva; Doug Campbell
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2019-03-28

9.  Effect of rigid cervical collar on tracheal intubation using Airtraq(®).

Authors:  Padmaja Durga; Chiranjeevi Yendrapati; Geeta Kaniti; Narmada Padhy; Kiran Kumar Anne; Gopinath Ramachandran
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2014-07

10.  Airway Management with Cervical Spine Immobilisation: A Comparison between the Macintosh Laryngoscope, Truview Evo2, and Totaltrack VLM Used by Novices--A Manikin Study.

Authors:  Dawid Aleksandrowicz; Tomasz Gaszyński
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.