Literature DB >> 33512518

Development of Electronic Health Record-Based Prediction Models for 30-Day Readmission Risk Among Patients Hospitalized for Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Michael E Matheny1,2,3,4, Iben Ricket5, Christine A Goodrich5, Rashmee U Shah6, Meagan E Stabler5, Amy M Perkins2,4, Chad Dorn1, Jason Denton1, Bruce E Bray6,7, Ram Gouripeddi7, John Higgins5, Wendy W Chapman7,8, Todd A MacKenzie5, Jeremiah R Brown5.   

Abstract

Importance: In the US, more than 600 000 adults will experience an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) each year, and up to 20% of the patients will be rehospitalized within 30 days. This study highlights the need for consideration of calibration in these risk models. Objective: To compare multiple machine learning risk prediction models using an electronic health record (EHR)-derived data set standardized to a common data model. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective cohort study that developed risk prediction models for 30-day readmission among all inpatients discharged from Vanderbilt University Medical Center between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2016, with a primary diagnosis of AMI who were not transferred from another facility. The model was externally validated at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center from April 2, 2011, to December 31, 2016. Data analysis occurred between January 4, 2019, and November 15, 2020. Exposures: Acute myocardial infarction that required hospital admission. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was thirty-day hospital readmission. A total of 141 candidate variables were considered from administrative codes, medication orders, and laboratory tests. Multiple risk prediction models were developed using parametric models (elastic net, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and ridge regression) and nonparametric models (random forest and gradient boosting). The models were assessed using holdout data with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), percentage of calibration, and calibration curve belts.
Results: The final Vanderbilt University Medical Center cohort included 6163 unique patients, among whom the mean (SD) age was 67 (13) years, 4137 were male (67.1%), 1019 (16.5%) were Black or other race, and 933 (15.1%) were rehospitalized within 30 days. The final Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center cohort included 4024 unique patients, with mean (SD) age of 68 (12) years; 2584 (64.2%) were male, 412 (10.2%) were rehospitalized within 30 days, and most of the cohort were non-Hispanic and White. The final test set AUROC performance was between 0.686 to 0.695 for the parametric models and 0.686 to 0.704 for the nonparametric models. In the validation cohort, AUROC performance was between 0.558 to 0.655 for parametric models and 0.606 to 0.608 for nonparametric models. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, 5 machine learning models were developed and externally validated to predict 30-day readmission AMI hospitalization. These models can be deployed within an EHR using routinely collected data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33512518      PMCID: PMC7846941          DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.35782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


  41 in total

1.  Integrating best evidence into patient care: a process facilitated by a seamless integration with informatics tools.

Authors:  Nunzia B Giuse; Annette M Williams; Dario A Giuse
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2010-07

2.  An administrative claims measure suitable for profiling hospital performance on the basis of 30-day all-cause readmission rates among patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Patricia S Keenan; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Zhenqiu Lin; Elizabeth E Drye; Kanchana R Bhat; Joseph S Ross; Jeremiah D Schuur; Brett D Stauffer; Susannah M Bernheim; Andrew J Epstein; Yongfei Wang; Jeph Herrin; Jersey Chen; Jessica J Federer; Jennifer A Mattera; Yun Wang; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2008-09

3.  Evaluating common data models for use with a longitudinal community registry.

Authors:  Maryam Garza; Guilherme Del Fiol; Jessica Tenenbaum; Anita Walden; Meredith Nahm Zozus
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 4.  Representing Knowledge Consistently Across Health Systems.

Authors:  S T Rosenbloom; R J Carroll; J L Warner; M E Matheny; J C Denny
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2017-09-11

5.  The Impact of Disability and Social Determinants of Health on Condition-Specific Readmissions beyond Medicare Risk Adjustments: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jennifer Meddings; Heidi Reichert; Shawna N Smith; Theodore J Iwashyna; Kenneth M Langa; Timothy P Hofer; Laurence F McMahon
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Acute Myocardial Infarction Readmission Risk Prediction Models: A Systematic Review of Model Performance.

Authors:  Lauren N Smith; Anil N Makam; Douglas Darden; Helen Mayo; Sandeep R Das; Ethan A Halm; Oanh Kieu Nguyen
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2018-01

7.  Factors associated with 30-day readmission rates after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Farhan J Khawaja; Nilay D Shah; Ryan J Lennon; Joshua P Slusser; Aziz A Alkatib; Charanjit S Rihal; Bernard J Gersh; Victor M Montori; David R Holmes; Malcolm R Bell; Jeptha P Curtis; Harlan M Krumholz; Henry H Ting
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-11-28

8.  An administrative claims measure suitable for profiling hospital performance based on 30-day all-cause readmission rates among patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Harlan M Krumholz; Zhenqiu Lin; Elizabeth E Drye; Mayur M Desai; Lein F Han; Michael T Rapp; Jennifer A Mattera; Sharon-Lise T Normand
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2011-03

9.  Supporting communication in an integrated patient record system.

Authors:  Dario A Giuse
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

Review 10.  Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement.

Authors:  Gary S Collins; Johannes B Reitsma; Douglas G Altman; Karel G M Moons
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-01-07
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Readmission After ACS: Burden, Epidemiology, and Mitigation.

Authors:  Peter K Boulos; John C Messenger; Stephen W Waldo
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 3.955

2.  Omission in Funding.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-03-01

3.  Adaptation of an NLP system to a new healthcare environment to identify social determinants of health.

Authors:  Ruth M Reeves; Lee Christensen; Jeremiah R Brown; Michael Conway; Maxwell Levis; Glenn T Gobbel; Rashmee U Shah; Christine Goodrich; Iben Ricket; Freneka Minter; Andrew Bohm; Bruce E Bray; Michael E Matheny; Wendy Chapman
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 8.000

4.  Information Extraction From Electronic Health Records to Predict Readmission Following Acute Myocardial Infarction: Does Natural Language Processing Using Clinical Notes Improve Prediction of Readmission?

Authors:  Jeremiah R Brown; Iben M Ricket; Ruth M Reeves; Rashmee U Shah; Christine A Goodrich; Glen Gobbel; Meagan E Stabler; Amy M Perkins; Freneka Minter; Kevin C Cox; Chad Dorn; Jason Denton; Bruce E Bray; Ramkiran Gouripeddi; John Higgins; Wendy W Chapman; Todd MacKenzie; Michael E Matheny
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 6.106

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.