| Literature DB >> 33510951 |
Leonardo S Shigueoka1,2, Eduardo B Mariottoni1, Atalie C Thompson1, Alessandro A Jammal1,2, Vital P Costa2, Felipe A Medeiros1.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess whether age can be predicted from deep learning analysis of peripapillary spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) B-scans and to determine the importance of specific retinal areas on the predictions.Entities:
Keywords: aging; artificial intelligence; deep learning; optical tomography coherence; posterior eye segment
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33510951 PMCID: PMC7804495 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.10.1.12
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol ISSN: 2164-2591 Impact factor: 3.283
Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of the Eyes and Participants Included in the Study
| Total | |
|---|---|
| No. of images | 7271 |
| No. of eyes | 542 |
| No. of participants | 278 |
| Age (years) | |
| mean ± SD | 55.8 ± 14.1 |
| range | 20.8 to 85.8 |
| Female gender (%) | 66.4 |
| Race (%) | |
| Caucasian | 67.5 |
| Black or African American | 25.4 |
| Asian | 3.7 |
| Other | 3.4 |
| SAP MD (dB), mean ± SD | 0.07 ± 1.3 |
| SAP PSD (dB), mean ± SD | 1.6 ± 0.4 |
| SD-OCT global RNFL thickness (µm), mean ± SD | 96.9 ± 9.9 |
MD, mean deviation; PSD, pattern standard deviation; SAP, standard automated perimetry.
Figure 1.Scatterplot showing the relationship between predicted age from the deep learning model applied to the whole SD-OCT peripapillary B-scan versus the true chronological age on the study dataset.
Figure 2.AUC and confidence interval (CI) for the deep learning algorithm in discriminating between oldest and youngest tertiles.
Figure 3.Examples from the age prediction and the class activation maps (heatmaps) showing the regions of the peripapillary spectral-domain optical coherence tomography B-scan images that had the greatest weight in the DL algorithm's discrimination between oldest versus youngest tertiles. The chronological age and the predicted age are reported above each image. (A) Individual correctly classified within the youngest tertile. (B) Individual correctly classified within the oldest tertile. (C) Young individual with an age prediction error (overestimation of true age) of 15.4 years. (D) Older individual that had an underestimated prediction of age by 12.5 years.
Figure 4.Results of deep learning models using image ablation for the different retinal structures.
Comparison of Correlation Coefficients Between the Age Predictions from the Deep Learning Algorithms and the True Chronological Age Using the Entire B-Scan or the Different Isolated Areas
| Choroid | Vitreous | Retina | RNFL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entire B-scan | 0.860 vs. 0.736 (0.006 to 0.155) | 0.860 vs. 0.736 (0.071 to 0.267) | 0.860 vs. 0.672 (0.061 to 0.305) | 0.860 vs. 0.492 (0.307 to 0.418) |
| Choroid | 0.736 vs. 0.736 (−0.058 to 0.219) | 0.736 vs. 0.672 (−0.038 to 0.230) | 0.736 vs. 0.492 0.148 to 0.490) | |
| Vitreous | 0.736 vs. 0.672 (−0.135 to 0.137) | 0.736 vs. 0.492 (0.042 to 0.425) | ||
| Retina | 0.672 vs. 0.492 (0.006 to 0.425) |
The parentheses show 95% confidence interval of the difference.
Retinal layers without the RNFL.