Literature DB >> 32053142

Assessment of a Segmentation-Free Deep Learning Algorithm for Diagnosing Glaucoma From Optical Coherence Tomography Scans.

Atalie C Thompson1, Alessandro A Jammal1, Samuel I Berchuck1,2, Eduardo B Mariottoni1, Felipe A Medeiros1.   

Abstract

Importance: Conventional segmentation of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) is prone to errors that may affect the accuracy of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) scans in detecting glaucomatous damage. Objective: To develop a segmentation-free deep learning (DL) algorithm for assessment of glaucomatous damage using the entire circle B-scan image from SD-OCT. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study at a single institution used data from SD-OCT images of eyes with glaucoma (perimetric and preperimetric) and normal eyes. The data set was randomly split at the patient level into a training (50%), validation (20%), and test data set (30%). Data were collected from March 2008 to April 2019, and analysis began April 2018. Exposures: A convolutional neural network was trained to discriminate glaucomatous from normal eyes using the SD-OCT circle B-scan without segmentation lines. Main Outcomes and Measures: The ability to discriminate glaucoma from healthy eyes was evaluated by comparing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and sensitivity at 80% or 95% specificity for the DL algorithm's predicted probability of glaucoma vs conventional RNFL thickness parameters given by SD-OCT software. The performance was also assessed in preperimetric glaucoma, as well as by visual field severity using Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson criteria.
Results: A total of 20 806 SD-OCT images from 1154 eyes of 635 individuals (612 [53%] with glaucoma and 542 normal eyes [47%]) were included. The mean (SD) age at SD-OCT scan was 70.8 (10.4) years in individuals with glaucoma and 55.8 (14.1) years in controls. There were 187 women (53.3%) in the glaucoma group and 165 (59.8%) in the control group. Of 612 eyes with glaucoma, 432 (70.4%) had perimetric and 180 (29.6%) had preperimetric glaucoma. The DL algorithm had a significantly higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve than global RNFL thickness (0.96 vs 0.87; difference = 0.08 [95% CI, 0.04-0.12]) and each RNFL thickness sector for discriminating between glaucoma and controls (all P < .001). At 95% specificity, the DL algorithm (81%; 95% CI, 64%-97%) was more sensitive than global RNFL thickness (67%; 95% CI, 58%-76%). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were also significantly greater for the DL algorithm compared with RNFL thickness at each stage of disease, especially preperimetric and mild perimetric glaucoma. Conclusions and Relevance: A segmentation-free DL algorithm performed better than conventional RNFL thickness parameters for diagnosing glaucomatous damage on OCT scans, especially in early disease. Future studies should investigate how such an approach contributes to diagnostic decisions when combined with other relevant clinical information, such as risk factors and perimetry results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32053142      PMCID: PMC7042899          DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.5983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2168-6165            Impact factor:   7.389


  15 in total

1.  Distribution-free ROC analysis using binary regression techniques.

Authors:  Todd A Alonzo; Margaret Sullivan Pepe
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  A statistical approach to the evaluation of covariate effects on the receiver operating characteristic curves of diagnostic tests in glaucoma.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Pamela A Sample; Linda M Zangwill; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Christopher A Girkin; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Using Deep Learning and Transfer Learning to Accurately Diagnose Early-Onset Glaucoma From Macular Optical Coherence Tomography Images.

Authors:  Ryo Asaoka; Hiroshi Murata; Kazunori Hirasawa; Yuri Fujino; Masato Matsuura; Atsuya Miki; Takashi Kanamoto; Yoko Ikeda; Kazuhiko Mori; Aiko Iwase; Nobuyuki Shoji; Kenji Inoue; Junkichi Yamagami; Makoto Araie
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Automated Segmentation Errors When Using Optical Coherence Tomography to Measure Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Steven L Mansberger; Shivali A Menda; Brad A Fortune; Stuart K Gardiner; Shaban Demirel
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Hybrid Deep Learning on Single Wide-field Optical Coherence tomography Scans Accurately Classifies Glaucoma Suspects.

Authors:  Hassan Muhammad; Thomas J Fuchs; Nicole De Cuir; Carlos G De Moraes; Dana M Blumberg; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch; Donald C Hood
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Validating the Usefulness of the "Random Forests" Classifier to Diagnose Early Glaucoma With Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Ryo Asaoka; Kazunori Hirasawa; Aiko Iwase; Yuri Fujino; Hiroshi Murata; Nobuyuki Shoji; Makoto Araie
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Michael A Kass; Dale K Heuer; Eve J Higginbotham; Chris A Johnson; John L Keltner; J Philip Miller; Richard K Parrish; M Roy Wilson; Mae O Gordon
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-06

Review 8.  The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: a review.

Authors:  Robert N Weinreb; Tin Aung; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Spectral domain-optical coherence tomography to detect localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects in glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Gianmarco Vizzeri; Madhusudhanan Balasubramanian; Christopher Bowd; Robert N Weinreb; Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  21 in total

1.  Data-Driven, Feature-Agnostic Deep Learning vs Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness for the Diagnosis of Glaucoma.

Authors:  Christine A Petersen; Parmita Mehta; Aaron Y Lee
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 7.389

2.  Glaucoma classification in 3 x 3 mm en face macular scans using deep learning in a different plexus.

Authors:  Julia Schottenhamml; Tobias Würfl; Sophia Mardin; Stefan B Ploner; Lennart Husvogt; Bettina Hohberger; Robert Lämmer; Christian Mardin; Andreas Maier
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 3.  The use of deep learning technology for the detection of optic neuropathy.

Authors:  Mei Li; Chao Wan
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-03

4.  Decision Trees for Glaucoma Screening Based on the Asymmetry of the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer in Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Rafael Berenguer-Vidal; Rafael Verdú-Monedero; Juan Morales-Sánchez; Inmaculada Sellés-Navarro; Oleksandr Kovalyk; José-Luis Sancho-Gómez
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Automated Detection of Glaucoma With Interpretable Machine Learning Using Clinical Data and Multimodal Retinal Images.

Authors:  Parmita Mehta; Christine A Petersen; Joanne C Wen; Michael R Banitt; Philip P Chen; Karine D Bojikian; Catherine Egan; Su-In Lee; Magdalena Balazinska; Aaron Y Lee; Ariel Rokem
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Estimating the Severity of Visual Field Damage From Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measurements With Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  Xiaoqin Huang; Jian Sun; Juleke Majoor; Koenraad Arndt Vermeer; Hans Lemij; Tobias Elze; Mengyu Wang; Michael Vincent Boland; Louis Robert Pasquale; Vahid Mohammadzadeh; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Chris Johnson; Siamak Yousefi
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  Glaucoma and Machine Learning: A Call for Increased Diversity in Data.

Authors:  Sayuri Sekimitsu; Nazlee Zebardast
Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma       Date:  2021-04-17

8.  A Case for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Glaucoma Assessment.

Authors:  Joel S Schuman; Maria De Los Angeles Ramos Cadena; Rebecca McGee; Lama A Al-Aswad; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma       Date:  2021-12-22

Review 9.  Deep learning in glaucoma with optical coherence tomography: a review.

Authors:  An Ran Ran; Clement C Tham; Poemen P Chan; Ching-Yu Cheng; Yih-Chung Tham; Tyler Hyungtaek Rim; Carol Y Cheung
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 10.  Optical Coherence Tomography and Glaucoma.

Authors:  Alexi Geevarghese; Gadi Wollstein; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 7.745

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.