Zhichao Wu1, Luke J Saunders2, Linda M Zangwill2, Fábio B Daga2, Jonathan G Crowston3, Felipe A Medeiros4. 1. Hamilton Glaucoma Center and Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California; Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia; Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. 2. Hamilton Glaucoma Center and Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California. 3. Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia; Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. 4. Hamilton Glaucoma Center and Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California. Electronic address: fmedeiros@ucsd.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the specificity of current definitions used to identify progressive change of the average peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurements obtained on optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. METHODS: Setting: University of California, San Diego. STUDY POPULATION: Seventy-five eyes from 45 normal participants. OBSERVATION PROCEDURE: Patients were seen at an average of 5.7 visits over 3.2 years, to determine the age-related average RNFL thickness changes and longitudinal measurement variability. Slope and variability estimates were used to reconstruct "real-world" OCT imaging measurements with computer simulations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: False-positive rates for progression in normal eyes using different definitions. RESULTS: The estimated normal average RNFL thickness change over time was -0.54 ± 0.23 μm/year (P < .001). Even with a recent definition of progression that appeared to guarantee a high level of specificity by accounting for normal aging (requiring a significant negative slope that was more negative than the 5% lower limit of aging), 18% simulated normal eyes were still falsely identified as having progressed after 5 years of annual testing in a clinical practice scenario. However, this was reduced to 8% and 4% when trend-based analysis of progression was performed after adjustments using the mean and 5% lower limit of normal rates of aging, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights how current definitions for detecting RNFL thinning have an unacceptably poor level of specificity, and that more stringent definitions are required to avoid misleading interpretations of progression on OCT imaging in clinical practice.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the specificity of current definitions used to identify progressive change of the average peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurements obtained on optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. METHODS: Setting: University of California, San Diego. STUDY POPULATION: Seventy-five eyes from 45 normal participants. OBSERVATION PROCEDURE: Patients were seen at an average of 5.7 visits over 3.2 years, to determine the age-related average RNFL thickness changes and longitudinal measurement variability. Slope and variability estimates were used to reconstruct "real-world" OCT imaging measurements with computer simulations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: False-positive rates for progression in normal eyes using different definitions. RESULTS: The estimated normal average RNFL thickness change over time was -0.54 ± 0.23 μm/year (P < .001). Even with a recent definition of progression that appeared to guarantee a high level of specificity by accounting for normal aging (requiring a significant negative slope that was more negative than the 5% lower limit of aging), 18% simulated normal eyes were still falsely identified as having progressed after 5 years of annual testing in a clinical practice scenario. However, this was reduced to 8% and 4% when trend-based analysis of progression was performed after adjustments using the mean and 5% lower limit of normal rates of aging, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights how current definitions for detecting RNFL thinning have an unacceptably poor level of specificity, and that more stringent definitions are required to avoid misleading interpretations of progression on OCT imaging in clinical practice.
Authors: Atalie C Thompson; Alessandro A Jammal; Samuel I Berchuck; Eduardo B Mariottoni; Zhichao Wu; Fabio B Daga; Nara G Ogata; Carla N Urata; Tais Estrela; Felipe A Medeiros Journal: Ophthalmol Glaucoma Date: 2020-06-14
Authors: Eduardo M Normando; Tim E Yap; John Maddison; Serge Miodragovic; Paolo Bonetti; Melanie Almonte; Nada G Mohammad; Sally Ameen; Laura Crawley; Faisal Ahmed; Philip A Bloom; Maria Francesca Cordeiro Journal: Expert Rev Mol Diagn Date: 2020-05-03 Impact factor: 5.225
Authors: Zhichao Wu; Abinaya Thenappan; Denis S D Weng; Robert Ritch; Donald C Hood Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2018-02-28 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Swarup S Swaminathan; Anne L Kunkler; Ann V Quan; Charles M Medert; Elizabeth A Vanner; William Feuer; Ta Chen Chang Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2020-12-24 Impact factor: 5.488
Authors: Peter J Snyder; Jessica Alber; Clemens Alt; Lisa J Bain; Brett E Bouma; Femke H Bouwman; Delia Cabrera DeBuc; Melanie C W Campbell; Maria C Carrillo; Emily Y Chew; M Francesca Cordeiro; Michael R Dueñas; Brian M Fernández; Maya Koronyo-Hamaoui; Chiara La Morgia; Roxana O' Carare; Srinivas R Sadda; Peter van Wijngaarden; Heather M Snyder Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2020-10-08 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Christopher Bowd; Akram Belghith; Mark Christopher; Michael H Goldbaum; Massimo A Fazio; Christopher A Girkin; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Carlos Gustavo de Moraes; Robert N Weinreb; Linda M Zangwill Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 3.048
Authors: Mark Christopher; Akram Belghith; Robert N Weinreb; Christopher Bowd; Michael H Goldbaum; Luke J Saunders; Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 4.799