Literature DB >> 31561879

Deep Learning and Glaucoma Specialists: The Relative Importance of Optic Disc Features to Predict Glaucoma Referral in Fundus Photographs.

Sonia Phene1, R Carter Dunn1, Naama Hammel2, Yun Liu1, Jonathan Krause1, Naho Kitade1, Mike Schaekermann1, Rory Sayres1, Derek J Wu1, Ashish Bora1, Christopher Semturs1, Anita Misra1, Abigail E Huang1, Arielle Spitze3, Felipe A Medeiros4, April Y Maa5, Monica Gandhi6, Greg S Corrado1, Lily Peng1, Dale R Webster1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop and validate a deep learning (DL) algorithm that predicts referable glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) and optic nerve head (ONH) features from color fundus images, to determine the relative importance of these features in referral decisions by glaucoma specialists (GSs) and the algorithm, and to compare the performance of the algorithm with eye care providers.
DESIGN: Development and validation of an algorithm. PARTICIPANTS: Fundus images from screening programs, studies, and a glaucoma clinic.
METHODS: A DL algorithm was trained using a retrospective dataset of 86 618 images, assessed for glaucomatous ONH features and referable GON (defined as ONH appearance worrisome enough to justify referral for comprehensive examination) by 43 graders. The algorithm was validated using 3 datasets: dataset A (1205 images, 1 image/patient; 18.1% referable), images adjudicated by panels of GSs; dataset B (9642 images, 1 image/patient; 9.2% referable), images from a diabetic teleretinal screening program; and dataset C (346 images, 1 image/patient; 81.7% referable), images from a glaucoma clinic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The algorithm was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity for referable GON and glaucomatous ONH features.
RESULTS: The algorithm's AUC for referable GON was 0.945 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.929-0.960) in dataset A, 0.855 (95% CI, 0.841-0.870) in dataset B, and 0.881 (95% CI, 0.838-0.918) in dataset C. Algorithm AUCs ranged between 0.661 and 0.973 for glaucomatous ONH features. The algorithm showed significantly higher sensitivity than 7 of 10 graders not involved in determining the reference standard, including 2 of 3 GSs, and showed higher specificity than 3 graders (including 1 GS), while remaining comparable to others. For both GSs and the algorithm, the most crucial features related to referable GON were: presence of vertical cup-to-disc ratio of 0.7 or more, neuroretinal rim notching, retinal nerve fiber layer defect, and bared circumlinear vessels.
CONCLUSIONS: A DL algorithm trained on fundus images alone can detect referable GON with higher sensitivity than and comparable specificity to eye care providers. The algorithm maintained good performance on an independent dataset with diagnoses based on a full glaucoma workup.
Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Ophthalmology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31561879     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.07.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  30 in total

1.  Retinal Glaucoma Public Datasets: What Do We Have and What Is Missing?

Authors:  José Camara; Roberto Rezende; Ivan Miguel Pires; António Cunha
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Artificial Intelligence for Glaucoma: Creating and Implementing Artificial Intelligence for Disease Detection and Progression.

Authors:  Lama A Al-Aswad; Rithambara Ramachandran; Joel S Schuman; Felipe Medeiros; Malvina B Eydelman
Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma       Date:  2022-02-24

3.  A deep learning system for identifying lattice degeneration and retinal breaks using ultra-widefield fundus images.

Authors:  Zhongwen Li; Chong Guo; Danyao Nie; Duoru Lin; Yi Zhu; Chuan Chen; Li Zhang; Fabao Xu; Chenjin Jin; Xiayin Zhang; Hui Xiao; Kai Zhang; Lanqin Zhao; Shanshan Yu; Guoming Zhang; Jiantao Wang; Haotian Lin
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-11

4.  Automated Detection of Glaucoma With Interpretable Machine Learning Using Clinical Data and Multimodal Retinal Images.

Authors:  Parmita Mehta; Christine A Petersen; Joanne C Wen; Michael R Banitt; Philip P Chen; Karine D Bojikian; Catherine Egan; Su-In Lee; Magdalena Balazinska; Aaron Y Lee; Ariel Rokem
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Deep Learning for Glaucoma Detection and Identification of Novel Diagnostic Areas in Diverse Real-World Datasets.

Authors:  Erfan Noury; Suria S Mannil; Robert T Chang; An Ran Ran; Carol Y Cheung; Suman S Thapa; Harsha L Rao; Srilakshmi Dasari; Mohammed Riyazuddin; Dolly Chang; Sriharsha Nagaraj; Clement C Tham; Reza Zadeh
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 3.048

6.  Robust and Interpretable Convolutional Neural Networks to Detect Glaucoma in Optical Coherence Tomography Images.

Authors:  Kaveri A Thakoor; Sharath C Koorathota; Donald C Hood; Paul Sajda
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 4.756

7.  A Case for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Glaucoma Assessment.

Authors:  Joel S Schuman; Maria De Los Angeles Ramos Cadena; Rebecca McGee; Lama A Al-Aswad; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma       Date:  2021-12-22

Review 8.  Discovery and clinical translation of novel glaucoma biomarkers.

Authors:  Gala Beykin; Anthony M Norcia; Vivek J Srinivasan; Alfredo Dubra; Jeffrey L Goldberg
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 21.198

Review 9.  Optical Coherence Tomography and Glaucoma.

Authors:  Alexi Geevarghese; Gadi Wollstein; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 7.745

10.  The AI Revolution and How to Prepare for It.

Authors:  Joelle A Hallak; Dimitri T Azar
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.