Literature DB >> 33505238

Auditory Brainstem Response to Paired Click Stimulation as an Indicator of Peripheral Synaptic Health in Noise-Induced Cochlear Synaptopathy.

Jae-Hun Lee1, Min Young Lee1,2, Ji Eun Choi1,2, Jae Yun Jung1,2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A defect in the cochlear afferent synapse between the inner hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons, after noise exposure, without changes in the hearing threshold has been reported. Animal studies on auditory evoked potentials demonstrated changes in the auditory brainstem response (ABR) measurements of peak I amplitude and the loss of synapses, which affect the temporal resolution of complex sounds. Human studies of auditory evoked potential have reported ambiguous results regarding the relationship between peak I amplitude and noise exposure. Paired click stimuli have been used to investigate the temporal processing abilities of humans and animals. In this study, we investigated the utility of measuring auditory evoked potentials in response to paired click stimuli to assess the temporal processing function of ribbon synapses in noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two Sprague Dawley rats were used in this study, and synaptopathy was induced by narrow-band noise exposure (16 kHz with 1 kHz bandwidth, 105 dB sound pressure level for 2 h). ABRs to tone and paired click stimuli were measured before and 1, 3, 7, and 14 days after noise exposure. For histological analyses, hair cells and ribbon synapses were immunostained and the synapses quantified. The relationships among ABR peak I amplitude, number of synapses, and ABR to paired click stimuli were examined.
RESULTS: Our results showed that ABR thresholds increase 1 day after noise exposure but fully recover to baseline levels after 14 days. Further, we demonstrated test frequency-dependent decreases in peak I amplitude and the number of synapses after noise exposure. These decreases were statistically significant at frequencies of 16 and 32 kHz. However, the ABR recovery threshold to paired click stimuli increased, which represent deterioration in the ability of temporal auditory processing. Our results indicate that the ABR recovery threshold is highly correlated with ABR peak I amplitude after noise exposure. We also established a direct correlation between the ABR recovery threshold and histological findings.
CONCLUSION: The result from this study suggests that in animal studies, the ABR to paired click stimuli along with peak I amplitude has potential as an assessment tool for hidden hearing loss.
Copyright © 2021 Lee, Lee, Choi and Jung.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory brainstem evoked potentials; auditory peripheral function; excitotoxicity; noise induced cochlear synaptopathy; paired click paradigm

Year:  2021        PMID: 33505238      PMCID: PMC7830024          DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.596670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Neurosci        ISSN: 1662-453X            Impact factor:   4.677


  29 in total

1.  Age-related loss of activity of auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  R A Schmiedt; J H Mills; F A Boettcher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Spectrotemporal resolution tradeoff in auditory processing as revealed by human auditory brainstem responses and psychophysical indices.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ameenuddin Syed Khaja
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Contribution of auditory nerve fibers to compound action potential of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Jérôme Bourien; Yong Tang; Charlène Batrel; Antoine Huet; Marc Lenoir; Sabine Ladrech; Gilles Desmadryl; Régis Nouvian; Jean-Luc Puel; Jing Wang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Individual differences in auditory electric responses: comparisons of between-subject and within-subject variability. II. Amplitude of brainstem Vertex-positive peaks.

Authors:  J L Lauter; R L Loomis
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1988

5.  Songbirds tradeoff auditory frequency resolution and temporal resolution.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Megan D Gall; Gavin M Bidelman; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Noise exposure and hearing loss among sand and gravel miners.

Authors:  Deborah Landen; Steve Wilkins; Mark Stephenson; Linda McWilliams
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  Noise History and Auditory Function in Young Adults With and Without Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Christopher Spankovich; Colleen G Le Prell; Edward Lobarinas; Linda J Hood
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Round-window delivery of neurotrophin 3 regenerates cochlear synapses after acoustic overexposure.

Authors:  Jun Suzuki; Gabriel Corfas; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Coding deficits in hidden hearing loss induced by noise: the nature and impacts.

Authors:  Qiang Song; Pei Shen; Xiaowei Li; Lijuan Shi; Lijie Liu; Jiping Wang; Zhiping Yu; Kegan Stephen; Steve Aiken; Shankai Yin; Jian Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Coding Deficits in Noise-Induced Hidden Hearing Loss May Stem from Incomplete Repair of Ribbon Synapses in the Cochlea.

Authors:  Lijuan Shi; Yin Chang; Xiaowei Li; Steven J Aiken; Lijie Liu; Jian Wang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  3 in total

1.  Audiologic characterization using clinical physiological measures: Normative data from macaque monkeys.

Authors:  Amy N Stahl; Jane A Mondul; Katy A Alek; Troy A Hackett; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.672

2.  Time and Brain Region-Dependent Excitatory Neurochemical Alterations in Bilateral Common Carotid Artery Occlusion Global Ischemia Model.

Authors:  Olubukola Benedicta Ojo; Zainab Abiola Amoo; Mary Tolulope Olaleye; Sushil Kumar Jha; Afolabi Clement Akinmoladun
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 4.414

3.  Optimizing non-invasive functional markers for cochlear deafferentation based on electrocochleography and auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  Kelly C Harris; Jianxin Bao
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.482

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.