Literature DB >> 15238306

Noise exposure and hearing loss among sand and gravel miners.

Deborah Landen1, Steve Wilkins, Mark Stephenson, Linda McWilliams.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to describe workplace noise exposures, risk factors for hearing loss, and hearing levels among sand and gravel miners, and to determine whether full shift noise exposures resulted in changes in hearing thresholds from baseline values. Sand and gravel miners (n = 317) were interviewed regarding medical history, leisure-time and occupational noise exposure, other occupational exposures, and use of hearing protection. Audiometric tests were performed both before the work shift (following a 12-hour noise-free interval) and immediately following the work shift. Full shift noise dosimetry was conducted. Miners' noise exposures exceeded the Recommended Exposure Limit (REL) of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) for 69% of workers, and exceeded the Mine Safety and Health Administration's action level for enrollment in a hearing conservation program for 41% of workers. Significantly higher noise exposures occurred among employees of small companies, among workers with a job classification of truck driver, among males, and among black workers. Hearing protection usage was low, with 48% of subjects reporting that they never used hearing protection. Hearing impairment, as defined by NIOSH, was present among 37% of 275 subjects with valid audiograms. Black male workers and white male workers had higher hearing thresholds than males from a comparison North Carolina population unexposed to industrial noise. Small but statistically significant changes in hearing thresholds occurred following full shift noise exposure among subjects who had good hearing sensitivity at baseline. In a logistic regression model, age and history of a past noisy job were significant predictors of hearing impairment. Overall, sand and gravel workers have excessive noise exposures and significant hearing loss, and demonstrate inadequate use of hearing protection. Well-designed hearing conservation programs, with reduction of noise exposure, are clearly needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15238306      PMCID: PMC5540186          DOI: 10.1080/15459620490476503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  9 in total

1.  Cigarette smoking and risk for hearing impairment: a longitudinal study in Japanese male office workers.

Authors:  N Nakanishi; M Okamoto; K Nakamura; K Suzuki; K Tatara
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.162

2.  Distribution of risk factors for hearing loss: implications for evaluating risk of occupational noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Mary M Prince
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Combined effect of smoking and occupational exposure to noise on hearing loss in steel factory workers.

Authors:  T Mizoue; T Miyamoto; T Shimizu
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Age effect hearing levels for a black nonindustrial noise exposed population (NINEP).

Authors:  L H Royster; D P Driscoll; W G Thomas; J D Royster
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1980-02

5.  Occupational noise exposure of operators of heavy trucks.

Authors:  B Seshagiri
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1998-03

6.  Using audiometric data base analysis.

Authors:  J D Royster; L H Royster
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1986-10

7.  Age effect hearing levels for a white nonindustrial noise exposed population (ninep) and their use in evaluating industrial hearing conservation programs.

Authors:  L H Royster; W G Thomas
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1979-06

8.  Gender differences in a longitudinal study of age-associated hearing loss.

Authors:  J D Pearson; C H Morrell; S Gordon-Salant; L J Brant; E J Metter; L L Klein; J L Fozard
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Cigarette smoking and hearing loss: the epidemiology of hearing loss study.

Authors:  K J Cruickshanks; R Klein; B E Klein; T L Wiley; D M Nondahl; T S Tweed
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-06-03       Impact factor: 56.272

  9 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  The nicotinic receptor of cochlear hair cells: a possible pharmacotherapeutic target?

Authors:  Ana Belén Elgoyhen; Eleonora Katz; Paul A Fuchs
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 5.858

2.  Prevalence of hearing loss among noise-exposed workers within the Mining and Oil and Gas Extraction sectors, 2006-2015.

Authors:  Sean M Lawson; Elizabeth A Masterson; Amanda S Azman
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 3.079

3.  Hearing loss as a predictor for hearing protection attenuation among miners.

Authors:  Elon D Ullman; Lauren M Smith; Marjorie C McCullagh; Richard L Neitzel
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.948

Review 4.  Sensory Disruption in Modern Living and the Emergence of Sensory Inequities.

Authors:  Kara C Hoover
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2018-03-28

5.  Auditory Brainstem Response to Paired Click Stimulation as an Indicator of Peripheral Synaptic Health in Noise-Induced Cochlear Synaptopathy.

Authors:  Jae-Hun Lee; Min Young Lee; Ji Eun Choi; Jae Yun Jung
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  A Tester to Evaluate the Correct Placement of Earplugs.

Authors:  Emil Kozlowski; Rafal Mlynski; Leszek Morzynski; Adam Swidzinski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Middle ear pathologies in adults within the mining industry: A systematic review.

Authors:  Ben Sebothoma
Journal:  S Afr J Commun Disord       Date:  2020-03-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.