Literature DB >> 33502638

Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review.

Rea Ščepanović1, Krishma Labib2, Ivan Buljan3, Joeri Tijdink2,4, Ana Marušić3.   

Abstract

Research integrity (RI) is a continuously developing concept, and increasing emphasis is put on creating RI promotion practices. This study aimed to map the existing RI guidance documents at research performing organisations (RPOs) and research funding organisations (RFOs). A search of bibliographic databases and grey literature sources was performed, and retrieved documents were screened for eligibility. The search of bibliographical databases and reference lists of selected articles identified a total of 92 documents while the search of grey literature sources identified 118 documents for analysis. The retrieved documents were analysed based on their geographical origin, research field and organisational origin (RPO or RFO) of RI practices, types of guidance presented in them, and target groups to which RI practices are directed. Most of the identified practices were developed for research in general, and are applicable to all research fields (n = 117) and medical sciences (n = 78). They were mostly written in the form of guidelines (n = 136) and targeted researchers (n = 167). A comprehensive search of the existing RI promotion practices showed that initiatives mostly come from RPOs while only a few RI practices originate from RFOs. This study showed that more RI guidance documents are needed for natural sciences, social sciences, and humanities since only a small number of documents was developed specifically for these research fields. The explored documents and the gaps in knowledge identified in this study can be used for further development of RI promotion practices in RPOs and RFOs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Research ethics; Research funding organisations; Research integrity; Research integrity practices; Research integrity promotion; Research performing organisations

Year:  2021        PMID: 33502638      PMCID: PMC7840650          DOI: 10.1007/s11948-021-00281-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  17 in total

1.  A brief history of RCR education.

Authors:  Michael Kalichman
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Fostering integrity in research: definitions, current knowledge, and future directions.

Authors:  Nicholas H Steneck
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 3.  Reproducibility in science: improving the standard for basic and preclinical research.

Authors:  C Glenn Begley; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 17.367

4.  Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews.

Authors:  Micah D J Peters; Christina M Godfrey; Hanan Khalil; Patricia McInerney; Deborah Parker; Cassia Baldini Soares
Journal:  Int J Evid Based Healthc       Date:  2015-09

5.  Heterogeneity in European research integrity guidance: relying on values or norms?

Authors:  Simon Godecharle; Benoit Nemery; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  European Universities' Guidance on Research Integrity and Misconduct.

Authors:  Noémie Aubert Bonn; Simon Godecharle; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.742

7.  Fostering responsible research practices is a shared responsibility of multiple stakeholders.

Authors:  Lex M Bouter
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews.

Authors:  Andrea C Tricco; Erin Lillie; Wasifa Zarin; Kelly O'Brien; Heather Colquhoun; Monika Kastner; Danielle Levac; Carmen Ng; Jane Pearson Sharpe; Katherine Wilson; Meghan Kenny; Rachel Warren; Charlotte Wilson; Henry T Stelfox; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Working with Research Integrity-Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement.

Authors:  Ellen-Marie Forsberg; Frank O Anthun; Sharon Bailey; Giles Birchley; Henriette Bout; Carlo Casonato; Gloria González Fuster; Bert Heinrichs; Serge Horbach; Ingrid Skjæggestad Jacobsen; Jacques Janssen; Matthias Kaiser; Inge Lerouge; Barend van der Meulen; Sarah de Rijcke; Thomas Saretzki; Margit Sutrop; Marta Tazewell; Krista Varantola; Knut Jørgen Vie; Hub Zwart; Mira Zöller
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.525

10.  Addressing research integrity challenges: from penalising individual perpetrators to fostering research ecosystem quality care.

Authors:  Hub Zwart; Ruud Ter Meulen
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2019-06-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  Designing and implementing a research integrity promotion plan: Recommendations for research funders.

Authors:  Serge P J M Horbach; Lex M Bouter; George Gaskell; Maura Hiney; Panagiotis Kavouras; Niels Mejlgaard; Nick Allum; Noémie Aubert Bonn; Anna-Kathrine Bendtsen; Costas A Charitidis; Nik Claesen; Kris Dierickx; Anna Domaradzka; Andrea Reyes Elizondo; Nicole Föger; Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner; Teodora Konach; Krishma Labib; Ana Marušić; Daniel Pizzolato; Tine Ravn; Rea Roje; Mads P Sørensen; Borana Taraj; Giuseppe A Veltri; Joeri K Tijdink
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 9.593

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.